Cargando…

Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations

Several studies have related breeding success and survival of sea eagles to toxic or non-toxic stress separately. In the present investigation, we analysed single and combined impacts of both toxic and disturbance stress on populations of white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla), using an analytica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korsman, John C., Schipper, Aafke M., Lenders, H. J. Rob, Foppen, Ruud P. B., Hendriks, A. Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21861166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0760-8
_version_ 1782220637197041664
author Korsman, John C.
Schipper, Aafke M.
Lenders, H. J. Rob
Foppen, Ruud P. B.
Hendriks, A. Jan
author_facet Korsman, John C.
Schipper, Aafke M.
Lenders, H. J. Rob
Foppen, Ruud P. B.
Hendriks, A. Jan
author_sort Korsman, John C.
collection PubMed
description Several studies have related breeding success and survival of sea eagles to toxic or non-toxic stress separately. In the present investigation, we analysed single and combined impacts of both toxic and disturbance stress on populations of white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla), using an analytical single-species model. Chemical and eco(toxico)logical data reported from laboratory and field studies were used to parameterise and validate the model. The model was applied to assess the impact of ∑PCB, DDE and disturbance stress on the white-tailed eagle population in The Netherlands. Disturbance stress was incorporated through a 1.6% reduction in survival and a 10–50% reduction in reproduction. ∑PCB contamination from 1950 up to 1987 was found to be too high to allow the return of white-tailed eagle as a breeding species in that period. ∑PCB and population trends simulated for 2006–2050 suggest that future population growth is still reduced. Disturbance stress resulted in a reduced population development. The combination of both toxic and disturbance stress varied from a slower population development to a catastrophical reduction in population size, where the main cause was attributed to the reduction in reproduction of 50%. Application of the model was restricted by the current lack of quantitative dose–response relationships between non-toxic stress and survival and reproduction. Nevertheless, the model provides a first step towards integrating and quantifying the impacts of multiple stressors on white-tailed eagle populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3252495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32524952012-01-20 Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations Korsman, John C. Schipper, Aafke M. Lenders, H. J. Rob Foppen, Ruud P. B. Hendriks, A. Jan Ecotoxicology Article Several studies have related breeding success and survival of sea eagles to toxic or non-toxic stress separately. In the present investigation, we analysed single and combined impacts of both toxic and disturbance stress on populations of white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla), using an analytical single-species model. Chemical and eco(toxico)logical data reported from laboratory and field studies were used to parameterise and validate the model. The model was applied to assess the impact of ∑PCB, DDE and disturbance stress on the white-tailed eagle population in The Netherlands. Disturbance stress was incorporated through a 1.6% reduction in survival and a 10–50% reduction in reproduction. ∑PCB contamination from 1950 up to 1987 was found to be too high to allow the return of white-tailed eagle as a breeding species in that period. ∑PCB and population trends simulated for 2006–2050 suggest that future population growth is still reduced. Disturbance stress resulted in a reduced population development. The combination of both toxic and disturbance stress varied from a slower population development to a catastrophical reduction in population size, where the main cause was attributed to the reduction in reproduction of 50%. Application of the model was restricted by the current lack of quantitative dose–response relationships between non-toxic stress and survival and reproduction. Nevertheless, the model provides a first step towards integrating and quantifying the impacts of multiple stressors on white-tailed eagle populations. Springer US 2011-08-23 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3252495/ /pubmed/21861166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0760-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Korsman, John C.
Schipper, Aafke M.
Lenders, H. J. Rob
Foppen, Ruud P. B.
Hendriks, A. Jan
Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations
title Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations
title_full Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations
title_fullStr Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations
title_short Modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) populations
title_sort modelling the impact of toxic and disturbance stress on white-tailed eagle (haliaeetus albicilla) populations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21861166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0760-8
work_keys_str_mv AT korsmanjohnc modellingtheimpactoftoxicanddisturbancestressonwhitetailedeaglehaliaeetusalbicillapopulations
AT schipperaafkem modellingtheimpactoftoxicanddisturbancestressonwhitetailedeaglehaliaeetusalbicillapopulations
AT lendershjrob modellingtheimpactoftoxicanddisturbancestressonwhitetailedeaglehaliaeetusalbicillapopulations
AT foppenruudpb modellingtheimpactoftoxicanddisturbancestressonwhitetailedeaglehaliaeetusalbicillapopulations
AT hendriksajan modellingtheimpactoftoxicanddisturbancestressonwhitetailedeaglehaliaeetusalbicillapopulations