Cargando…

A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data

The variance components models for gene–environment interaction proposed by Purcell in 2002 are widely used. In both the bivariate and the univariate parameterization of these models, the variance decomposition of trait T is a function of moderator M. We show that if M and T are correlated, and mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Sluis, Sophie, Posthuma, Danielle, Dolan, Conor V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21748401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9480-3
_version_ 1782220719211413504
author van der Sluis, Sophie
Posthuma, Danielle
Dolan, Conor V.
author_facet van der Sluis, Sophie
Posthuma, Danielle
Dolan, Conor V.
author_sort van der Sluis, Sophie
collection PubMed
description The variance components models for gene–environment interaction proposed by Purcell in 2002 are widely used. In both the bivariate and the univariate parameterization of these models, the variance decomposition of trait T is a function of moderator M. We show that if M and T are correlated, and moderator M is correlated between twins as well, the univariate parameterization produces a considerable increase in false positive moderation effects. A simple extension of this univariate moderation model prevents this elevation of the false positive rate provided the covariance between M and T is itself not also subject to moderation. If the covariance between M and T varies as a function of M, then moderation effects observed in the univariate setting should be interpreted with care as these can have their origin in either moderation of the covariance between M and T or in moderation of the unique paths of T. We conclude that researchers should use the full bivariate moderation model to study the presence of moderation on the covariance between M and T. If such moderation can be ruled out, subsequent use of the extended univariate moderation model, as proposed in this paper, is recommended as this model is more powerful than the full bivariate moderation model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3253285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32532852012-01-20 A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data van der Sluis, Sophie Posthuma, Danielle Dolan, Conor V. Behav Genet Original Research The variance components models for gene–environment interaction proposed by Purcell in 2002 are widely used. In both the bivariate and the univariate parameterization of these models, the variance decomposition of trait T is a function of moderator M. We show that if M and T are correlated, and moderator M is correlated between twins as well, the univariate parameterization produces a considerable increase in false positive moderation effects. A simple extension of this univariate moderation model prevents this elevation of the false positive rate provided the covariance between M and T is itself not also subject to moderation. If the covariance between M and T varies as a function of M, then moderation effects observed in the univariate setting should be interpreted with care as these can have their origin in either moderation of the covariance between M and T or in moderation of the unique paths of T. We conclude that researchers should use the full bivariate moderation model to study the presence of moderation on the covariance between M and T. If such moderation can be ruled out, subsequent use of the extended univariate moderation model, as proposed in this paper, is recommended as this model is more powerful than the full bivariate moderation model. Springer US 2011-07-07 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3253285/ /pubmed/21748401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9480-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
van der Sluis, Sophie
Posthuma, Danielle
Dolan, Conor V.
A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data
title A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data
title_full A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data
title_fullStr A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data
title_full_unstemmed A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data
title_short A Note on False Positives and Power in G × E Modelling of Twin Data
title_sort note on false positives and power in g × e modelling of twin data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21748401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9480-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vandersluissophie anoteonfalsepositivesandpoweringemodellingoftwindata
AT posthumadanielle anoteonfalsepositivesandpoweringemodellingoftwindata
AT dolanconorv anoteonfalsepositivesandpoweringemodellingoftwindata
AT vandersluissophie noteonfalsepositivesandpoweringemodellingoftwindata
AT posthumadanielle noteonfalsepositivesandpoweringemodellingoftwindata
AT dolanconorv noteonfalsepositivesandpoweringemodellingoftwindata