Cargando…

Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the imaging findings of multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCTA) in cases of vasospastic angina (VA) and to determine the accuracy of MDCTA in the identification of VA as compared with invasive coronary angiography with an ergonovine provocation test (CAG with an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Koung Mi, Choi, Sang Il, Chun, Eun Ju, Kim, Jeong A, Youn, Tae-Jin, Choi, Dong Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22247633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.27
_version_ 1782220725093924864
author Kang, Koung Mi
Choi, Sang Il
Chun, Eun Ju
Kim, Jeong A
Youn, Tae-Jin
Choi, Dong Ju
author_facet Kang, Koung Mi
Choi, Sang Il
Chun, Eun Ju
Kim, Jeong A
Youn, Tae-Jin
Choi, Dong Ju
author_sort Kang, Koung Mi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the imaging findings of multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCTA) in cases of vasospastic angina (VA) and to determine the accuracy of MDCTA in the identification of VA as compared with invasive coronary angiography with an ergonovine provocation test (CAG with an EG test). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with clinically suspected VA were enrolled in this study. Two radiologists analyzed the stenosis degree, presence or absence of plaque, plaque composition, and a remodeling index of the related-segment in CAG with an EG test, which were used as a gold standard. We evaluated the diagnostic performances of MDCTA by comparing the MDCTA findings with those of CAG with an EG test. RESULTS: Among the 25 patients with positive CAG with an EG test, all 12 patients with significant stenosis showed no definite plaque with the negative arterial remodeling. Of the six patients with insignificant stenosis, three (50%) had non-calcified plaque (NCP), two (33%) had mixed plaque, and one (17%) had calcified plaque. When the criteria for significant stenosis with negative remodeling but no definite evidence of plaque as a characteristic finding of MDCTA were used, results showed sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of 48%, 100%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant stenosis with negative remodeling, but no definite evidence of plaque, is the characteristic finding on MDCTA of VA. Cardiac MDCTA shows good diagnostic performance with high specificity and PPV as compared with CAG with an EG test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3253400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32534002012-01-13 Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography Kang, Koung Mi Choi, Sang Il Chun, Eun Ju Kim, Jeong A Youn, Tae-Jin Choi, Dong Ju Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the imaging findings of multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCTA) in cases of vasospastic angina (VA) and to determine the accuracy of MDCTA in the identification of VA as compared with invasive coronary angiography with an ergonovine provocation test (CAG with an EG test). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with clinically suspected VA were enrolled in this study. Two radiologists analyzed the stenosis degree, presence or absence of plaque, plaque composition, and a remodeling index of the related-segment in CAG with an EG test, which were used as a gold standard. We evaluated the diagnostic performances of MDCTA by comparing the MDCTA findings with those of CAG with an EG test. RESULTS: Among the 25 patients with positive CAG with an EG test, all 12 patients with significant stenosis showed no definite plaque with the negative arterial remodeling. Of the six patients with insignificant stenosis, three (50%) had non-calcified plaque (NCP), two (33%) had mixed plaque, and one (17%) had calcified plaque. When the criteria for significant stenosis with negative remodeling but no definite evidence of plaque as a characteristic finding of MDCTA were used, results showed sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of 48%, 100%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant stenosis with negative remodeling, but no definite evidence of plaque, is the characteristic finding on MDCTA of VA. Cardiac MDCTA shows good diagnostic performance with high specificity and PPV as compared with CAG with an EG test. The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2011-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3253400/ /pubmed/22247633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.27 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Koung Mi
Choi, Sang Il
Chun, Eun Ju
Kim, Jeong A
Youn, Tae-Jin
Choi, Dong Ju
Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
title Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
title_full Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
title_fullStr Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
title_short Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
title_sort coronary vasospastic angina: assessment by multidetector ct coronary angiography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22247633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.27
work_keys_str_mv AT kangkoungmi coronaryvasospasticanginaassessmentbymultidetectorctcoronaryangiography
AT choisangil coronaryvasospasticanginaassessmentbymultidetectorctcoronaryangiography
AT chuneunju coronaryvasospasticanginaassessmentbymultidetectorctcoronaryangiography
AT kimjeonga coronaryvasospasticanginaassessmentbymultidetectorctcoronaryangiography
AT yountaejin coronaryvasospasticanginaassessmentbymultidetectorctcoronaryangiography
AT choidongju coronaryvasospasticanginaassessmentbymultidetectorctcoronaryangiography