Cargando…

The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine

Please cite this paper as: Lee et al. (2011) The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(3), 167–175. Background  Limitations of the current annual influenza vaccine have led to ongoing efforts to develop a ‘universal’ influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Bruce Y., Tai, Julie H. Y., McGlone, Sarah M., Bailey, Rachel R., Wateska, Angela R., Zimmer, Shanta M., Zimmerman, Richard K., Wagner, Michael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00288.x
_version_ 1782220784675061760
author Lee, Bruce Y.
Tai, Julie H. Y.
McGlone, Sarah M.
Bailey, Rachel R.
Wateska, Angela R.
Zimmer, Shanta M.
Zimmerman, Richard K.
Wagner, Michael M.
author_facet Lee, Bruce Y.
Tai, Julie H. Y.
McGlone, Sarah M.
Bailey, Rachel R.
Wateska, Angela R.
Zimmer, Shanta M.
Zimmerman, Richard K.
Wagner, Michael M.
author_sort Lee, Bruce Y.
collection PubMed
description Please cite this paper as: Lee et al. (2011) The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(3), 167–175. Background  Limitations of the current annual influenza vaccine have led to ongoing efforts to develop a ‘universal’ influenza vaccine, i.e., one that targets a ubiquitous portion of the influenza virus so that the coverage of a single vaccination can persist for multiple years. Objectives  To estimate the economic value of a ‘universal’ influenza vaccine compared to the standard annual influenza vaccine, starting vaccination in the pediatric population (2–18 year olds), over the course of their lifetime. Patient/Methods  Monte Carlo decision analytic computer simulation model. Results  Universal vaccine dominates (i.e., less costly and more effective) the annual vaccine when the universal vaccine cost ≤$100/dose and efficacy ≥75% for both the 5‐ and 10‐year duration. The universal vaccine is also dominant when efficacy is ≥50% and protects for 10 years. A $200 universal vaccine was only cost‐effective when ≥75% efficacious for a 5‐year duration when annual compliance was 25% and for a 10‐year duration for all annual compliance rates. A universal vaccine is not cost‐effective when it cost $200 and when its efficacy is ≤50%. The cost‐effectiveness of the universal vaccine increases with the duration of protection. Conclusions  Although development of a universal vaccine requires surmounting scientific hurdles, our results delineate the circumstances under which such a vaccine would be a cost‐effective alternative to the annual influenza vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3253949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32539492013-05-01 The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine Lee, Bruce Y. Tai, Julie H. Y. McGlone, Sarah M. Bailey, Rachel R. Wateska, Angela R. Zimmer, Shanta M. Zimmerman, Richard K. Wagner, Michael M. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Part 1 Please cite this paper as: Lee et al. (2011) The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(3), 167–175. Background  Limitations of the current annual influenza vaccine have led to ongoing efforts to develop a ‘universal’ influenza vaccine, i.e., one that targets a ubiquitous portion of the influenza virus so that the coverage of a single vaccination can persist for multiple years. Objectives  To estimate the economic value of a ‘universal’ influenza vaccine compared to the standard annual influenza vaccine, starting vaccination in the pediatric population (2–18 year olds), over the course of their lifetime. Patient/Methods  Monte Carlo decision analytic computer simulation model. Results  Universal vaccine dominates (i.e., less costly and more effective) the annual vaccine when the universal vaccine cost ≤$100/dose and efficacy ≥75% for both the 5‐ and 10‐year duration. The universal vaccine is also dominant when efficacy is ≥50% and protects for 10 years. A $200 universal vaccine was only cost‐effective when ≥75% efficacious for a 5‐year duration when annual compliance was 25% and for a 10‐year duration for all annual compliance rates. A universal vaccine is not cost‐effective when it cost $200 and when its efficacy is ≤50%. The cost‐effectiveness of the universal vaccine increases with the duration of protection. Conclusions  Although development of a universal vaccine requires surmounting scientific hurdles, our results delineate the circumstances under which such a vaccine would be a cost‐effective alternative to the annual influenza vaccine. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011-09-21 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3253949/ /pubmed/21933357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00288.x Text en © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Part 1
Lee, Bruce Y.
Tai, Julie H. Y.
McGlone, Sarah M.
Bailey, Rachel R.
Wateska, Angela R.
Zimmer, Shanta M.
Zimmerman, Richard K.
Wagner, Michael M.
The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
title The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
title_full The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
title_fullStr The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
title_full_unstemmed The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
title_short The potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
title_sort potential economic value of a ‘universal’ (multi‐year) influenza vaccine
topic Part 1
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00288.x
work_keys_str_mv AT leebrucey thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT taijuliehy thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT mcglonesarahm thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT baileyrachelr thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT wateskaangelar thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT zimmershantam thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT zimmermanrichardk thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT wagnermichaelm thepotentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT leebrucey potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT taijuliehy potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT mcglonesarahm potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT baileyrachelr potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT wateskaangelar potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT zimmershantam potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT zimmermanrichardk potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine
AT wagnermichaelm potentialeconomicvalueofauniversalmultiyearinfluenzavaccine