Cargando…
A rejoinder on energy versus impact indicators
Citation distributions are so skewed that using the mean or any other central tendency measure is ill-advised. Unlike G. Prathap’s scalar measures (Energy, Exergy, and Entropy or EEE), the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) is based on non-parametric statistics using the (100) percentiles of the distr...
Autores principales: | Leydesdorff, Loet, Opthof, Tobias |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22267881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0502-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467–481, 2011
por: Opthof, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Can technology life-cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications? The crucial role of variety
por: Leydesdorff, Loet
Publicado: (2015) -
Rejoinder
por: Bartrip, Peter
Publicado: (1999) -
An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis
por: Leydesdorff, Loet
Publicado: (2012)