Cargando…

Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in decreasing the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely dependent on the detection of polyps and the quality of the procedure. Several key quality measures have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of screening colonoscopies. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonçalves, Ana Rita, Ferreira, Carlos, Marques, António, Ribeiro, Luís Carrilho, Velosa, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3254205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235171
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S25596
_version_ 1782220814140047360
author Gonçalves, Ana Rita
Ferreira, Carlos
Marques, António
Ribeiro, Luís Carrilho
Velosa, José
author_facet Gonçalves, Ana Rita
Ferreira, Carlos
Marques, António
Ribeiro, Luís Carrilho
Velosa, José
author_sort Gonçalves, Ana Rita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in decreasing the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely dependent on the detection of polyps and the quality of the procedure. Several key quality measures have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of screening colonoscopies. AIM: To evaluate quality indicators of screening colonoscopy in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: All CRC screening colonoscopies performed between 2005 and 2009 in a single tertiary center were reviewed for internationally accepted quality measures. RESULTS: Of the 1545 individuals who underwent first-time screening colonoscopy 38% were male and 62% were female. The mean age of the patients was 60.4 years and the mean difference in ages was ± 10.3 years. Cecal intubation rate was 91% (1336), however ileocecal valve photo documentation was performed in only 81% (1248) colonoscopies. The quality of bowel preparation was classified as: good 76% (1171), reasonable 11% (174), and poor 13% (200). Polyp detection rate (PDR) was 33% (503). The prevalence of polyps ≥1 cm in size was 5% (82). PDR was significantly higher in men than in women (44% [260] vs 25% [243], P = 0.0001). Other factors significantly influencing PDR were quality of bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9–1.6) and age over 50 (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9). Left colonic polyps were associated with a risk ratio of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) of lesions in the other colonic segments compared to no polyps in the left colon. None of the colonoscopists reported withdrawal time. CONCLUSION: Cecal intubation rate and quality of bowel preparation were suboptimal. The polyp detection rate compares favorably to accepted standards and its main determinants are male sex, age >50 years, quality of bowel preparation, and the presence of left colonic polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3254205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32542052012-01-10 Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer Gonçalves, Ana Rita Ferreira, Carlos Marques, António Ribeiro, Luís Carrilho Velosa, José Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in decreasing the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely dependent on the detection of polyps and the quality of the procedure. Several key quality measures have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of screening colonoscopies. AIM: To evaluate quality indicators of screening colonoscopy in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: All CRC screening colonoscopies performed between 2005 and 2009 in a single tertiary center were reviewed for internationally accepted quality measures. RESULTS: Of the 1545 individuals who underwent first-time screening colonoscopy 38% were male and 62% were female. The mean age of the patients was 60.4 years and the mean difference in ages was ± 10.3 years. Cecal intubation rate was 91% (1336), however ileocecal valve photo documentation was performed in only 81% (1248) colonoscopies. The quality of bowel preparation was classified as: good 76% (1171), reasonable 11% (174), and poor 13% (200). Polyp detection rate (PDR) was 33% (503). The prevalence of polyps ≥1 cm in size was 5% (82). PDR was significantly higher in men than in women (44% [260] vs 25% [243], P = 0.0001). Other factors significantly influencing PDR were quality of bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9–1.6) and age over 50 (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9). Left colonic polyps were associated with a risk ratio of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) of lesions in the other colonic segments compared to no polyps in the left colon. None of the colonoscopists reported withdrawal time. CONCLUSION: Cecal intubation rate and quality of bowel preparation were suboptimal. The polyp detection rate compares favorably to accepted standards and its main determinants are male sex, age >50 years, quality of bowel preparation, and the presence of left colonic polyps. Dove Medical Press 2011-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3254205/ /pubmed/22235171 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S25596 Text en © 2011 Gonçalves et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gonçalves, Ana Rita
Ferreira, Carlos
Marques, António
Ribeiro, Luís Carrilho
Velosa, José
Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
title Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
title_full Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
title_short Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
title_sort assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3254205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235171
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S25596
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalvesanarita assessmentofqualityinscreeningcolonoscopyforcolorectalcancer
AT ferreiracarlos assessmentofqualityinscreeningcolonoscopyforcolorectalcancer
AT marquesantonio assessmentofqualityinscreeningcolonoscopyforcolorectalcancer
AT ribeiroluiscarrilho assessmentofqualityinscreeningcolonoscopyforcolorectalcancer
AT velosajose assessmentofqualityinscreeningcolonoscopyforcolorectalcancer