Cargando…

Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains

PURPOSE: To further the understanding of growing pains (GP), in particular, the nature of this pain disorder. METHODS: This study included 33 children aged 5–12 years who met criteria for GP (cases) and 29 children without GP of similar age and sex (controls). Nineteen controls were siblings of case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathirana, Shanthi, Champion, David, Jaaniste, Tiina, Yee, Anthony, Chapman, Cindy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22247622
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S24875
_version_ 1782221027318693888
author Pathirana, Shanthi
Champion, David
Jaaniste, Tiina
Yee, Anthony
Chapman, Cindy
author_facet Pathirana, Shanthi
Champion, David
Jaaniste, Tiina
Yee, Anthony
Chapman, Cindy
author_sort Pathirana, Shanthi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To further the understanding of growing pains (GP), in particular, the nature of this pain disorder. METHODS: This study included 33 children aged 5–12 years who met criteria for GP (cases) and 29 children without GP of similar age and sex (controls). Nineteen controls were siblings of cases. GP was diagnosed by standard consensus questionnaires. A questionnaire addressed characteristics of the pain and family history of GP. Evidence for peripheral neuropathic disorder was tested by somatosensory testing and provocation tests of peripheral nerves. Somatosensory testing by a blinded researcher involved threshold determination and/or response magnitude to nonpainful stimuli including touch, dynamic brush, cold, vibration, and deep pressure applied to limb and abdominal sites. RESULTS: Distributional, temporal, and quality characteristics of the pain were in accordance with published descriptions. There was no indication of primary musculoskeletal disorder. No evidence was found that GP is a peripheral neuropathic pain syndrome. There were minor but statistically significantly increased responses to cutaneous cold, vibration, and to deep pressure stimuli in cases compared to controls, evident in a wider distribution than the symptomatic lower limbs. CONCLUSION: GP is a regional pain syndrome with evidence in this study of mild widespread disorder of somatosensory processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3255993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32559932012-01-13 Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains Pathirana, Shanthi Champion, David Jaaniste, Tiina Yee, Anthony Chapman, Cindy J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: To further the understanding of growing pains (GP), in particular, the nature of this pain disorder. METHODS: This study included 33 children aged 5–12 years who met criteria for GP (cases) and 29 children without GP of similar age and sex (controls). Nineteen controls were siblings of cases. GP was diagnosed by standard consensus questionnaires. A questionnaire addressed characteristics of the pain and family history of GP. Evidence for peripheral neuropathic disorder was tested by somatosensory testing and provocation tests of peripheral nerves. Somatosensory testing by a blinded researcher involved threshold determination and/or response magnitude to nonpainful stimuli including touch, dynamic brush, cold, vibration, and deep pressure applied to limb and abdominal sites. RESULTS: Distributional, temporal, and quality characteristics of the pain were in accordance with published descriptions. There was no indication of primary musculoskeletal disorder. No evidence was found that GP is a peripheral neuropathic pain syndrome. There were minor but statistically significantly increased responses to cutaneous cold, vibration, and to deep pressure stimuli in cases compared to controls, evident in a wider distribution than the symptomatic lower limbs. CONCLUSION: GP is a regional pain syndrome with evidence in this study of mild widespread disorder of somatosensory processing. Dove Medical Press 2011-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3255993/ /pubmed/22247622 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S24875 Text en © 2011 Pathirana et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pathirana, Shanthi
Champion, David
Jaaniste, Tiina
Yee, Anthony
Chapman, Cindy
Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
title Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
title_full Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
title_fullStr Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
title_full_unstemmed Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
title_short Somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
title_sort somatosensory test responses in children with growing pains
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22247622
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S24875
work_keys_str_mv AT pathiranashanthi somatosensorytestresponsesinchildrenwithgrowingpains
AT championdavid somatosensorytestresponsesinchildrenwithgrowingpains
AT jaanistetiina somatosensorytestresponsesinchildrenwithgrowingpains
AT yeeanthony somatosensorytestresponsesinchildrenwithgrowingpains
AT chapmancindy somatosensorytestresponsesinchildrenwithgrowingpains