Cargando…

Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder carcinoma (GC) is a relatively rare malignancy worldwide but is the second commonest gastrointestinal cancer in Pakistani women. Gallstones have a positive association with GC but other factors also influence in causation. METHODS: This is a retrospective case control study o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvi, A Rehman, Siddiqui, Nadeem Ahmed, Zafar, Hasnain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3256117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-164
_version_ 1782221035475566592
author Alvi, A Rehman
Siddiqui, Nadeem Ahmed
Zafar, Hasnain
author_facet Alvi, A Rehman
Siddiqui, Nadeem Ahmed
Zafar, Hasnain
author_sort Alvi, A Rehman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gallbladder carcinoma (GC) is a relatively rare malignancy worldwide but is the second commonest gastrointestinal cancer in Pakistani women. Gallstones have a positive association with GC but other factors also influence in causation. METHODS: This is a retrospective case control study over a period of 19 years. The cases (Group A) were patients with histopathological proven carcinoma gallbladder (N = 60) and controls were patients with cholelithiasis but no carcinoma gallbladder on histopathology (N = 120). Multivariate regression analysis was done to calculate the odds ratio, 95% confidence interval and P-Value. A positive relationship was found between size of stone > 1 cm, solitary stone, age > 55 years and multi-parity in women. RESULTS: There were 60 patients in Group A and 120 patients in Group B. mean age of diagnosis in Group A patients was 57 ± 2.4 years while mean age of diagnosis in Group B patients was 48 ± 1.35 years. Sixty seven percent of cancer group patients were female as compared to 78% females in non-cancer group. In Group A, 69% of female patients were multiparous (parity of more than 5) while 43% of group B patients were multiparous. For body mass index (BMI), both groups were not very different in our study population i.e. around 78% patients in each group has BMI of more than 23 Kg/m2. In Group A, 37% (n = 22) have solitary stones as compared to 15% (n = 18) in group B. similarly Group A patients has larger stone size as compared to Group B i.e.59% (n = 36) patients in Group A have stones of more than 1 cm when compared to 35% (n = 41) patients in Group B. After using multivariate regression analysis, age more than 55 years (OR - 7.27, p value- < 0.001), solitary stone (OR - 3.33, p value - 0.002) and stone of more than 1 cm (OR - 2.73, p value - 0.004) were found to be independent risk factors for development of gallbladder cancer. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients (78%) with GC were female, and the statistically significant risk factors were older age, solitary stones and stones size more than one centimeter. A case can be made for prophylactic cholecystectomy in such a high risk group. However a population based study is required to calculate the true incidence of GC in Karachi and a prospective multi center study is needed to produce strong evidence for screening and prophylactic cholecystectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: As this was a retrospective review of medical records, as per institution policy, its gives waiver from any registration (ethical/trial).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3256117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32561172012-01-12 Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study Alvi, A Rehman Siddiqui, Nadeem Ahmed Zafar, Hasnain World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Gallbladder carcinoma (GC) is a relatively rare malignancy worldwide but is the second commonest gastrointestinal cancer in Pakistani women. Gallstones have a positive association with GC but other factors also influence in causation. METHODS: This is a retrospective case control study over a period of 19 years. The cases (Group A) were patients with histopathological proven carcinoma gallbladder (N = 60) and controls were patients with cholelithiasis but no carcinoma gallbladder on histopathology (N = 120). Multivariate regression analysis was done to calculate the odds ratio, 95% confidence interval and P-Value. A positive relationship was found between size of stone > 1 cm, solitary stone, age > 55 years and multi-parity in women. RESULTS: There were 60 patients in Group A and 120 patients in Group B. mean age of diagnosis in Group A patients was 57 ± 2.4 years while mean age of diagnosis in Group B patients was 48 ± 1.35 years. Sixty seven percent of cancer group patients were female as compared to 78% females in non-cancer group. In Group A, 69% of female patients were multiparous (parity of more than 5) while 43% of group B patients were multiparous. For body mass index (BMI), both groups were not very different in our study population i.e. around 78% patients in each group has BMI of more than 23 Kg/m2. In Group A, 37% (n = 22) have solitary stones as compared to 15% (n = 18) in group B. similarly Group A patients has larger stone size as compared to Group B i.e.59% (n = 36) patients in Group A have stones of more than 1 cm when compared to 35% (n = 41) patients in Group B. After using multivariate regression analysis, age more than 55 years (OR - 7.27, p value- < 0.001), solitary stone (OR - 3.33, p value - 0.002) and stone of more than 1 cm (OR - 2.73, p value - 0.004) were found to be independent risk factors for development of gallbladder cancer. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients (78%) with GC were female, and the statistically significant risk factors were older age, solitary stones and stones size more than one centimeter. A case can be made for prophylactic cholecystectomy in such a high risk group. However a population based study is required to calculate the true incidence of GC in Karachi and a prospective multi center study is needed to produce strong evidence for screening and prophylactic cholecystectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: As this was a retrospective review of medical records, as per institution policy, its gives waiver from any registration (ethical/trial). BioMed Central 2011-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3256117/ /pubmed/22151791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-164 Text en Copyright ©2011 Alvi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Alvi, A Rehman
Siddiqui, Nadeem Ahmed
Zafar, Hasnain
Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study
title Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study
title_full Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study
title_fullStr Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study
title_short Risk factors of gallbladder cancer in Karachi-a case-control study
title_sort risk factors of gallbladder cancer in karachi-a case-control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3256117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-164
work_keys_str_mv AT alviarehman riskfactorsofgallbladdercancerinkarachiacasecontrolstudy
AT siddiquinadeemahmed riskfactorsofgallbladdercancerinkarachiacasecontrolstudy
AT zafarhasnain riskfactorsofgallbladdercancerinkarachiacasecontrolstudy