Cargando…
Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention?
Feedback of fracture risk based on bone mineral density (BMD) is an under-explored potential osteoporosis education intervention. We performed a randomised controlled trial of either an osteoporosis information leaflet or small group education (the Osteoporosis Prevention and Self-Management Course...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22254067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu2090985 |
_version_ | 1782221198825881600 |
---|---|
author | Winzenberg, Tania Oldenburg, Brian Jones, Graeme |
author_facet | Winzenberg, Tania Oldenburg, Brian Jones, Graeme |
author_sort | Winzenberg, Tania |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feedback of fracture risk based on bone mineral density (BMD) is an under-explored potential osteoporosis education intervention. We performed a randomised controlled trial of either an osteoporosis information leaflet or small group education (the Osteoporosis Prevention and Self-Management Course (OPSMC)), combined with individualised fracture risk feedback in premenopausal women over two years. Women with a mean T-score at spine and hip of <0 were informed they were at higher risk of fracture in later life and those with T-score ≥ 0 were informed they were not. Women receiving feedback of high fracture risk had a greater increase in femoral neck, but not lumbar spine, BMD compared to the low risk group (1.6% p.a. vs. 0.7% p.a., p = 0.0001). Participation in the OPSMC had no greater effect on BMD than receiving the leaflet. Femoral neck BMD change was associated with starting calcium supplements (1.3% p.a., 95% CI +0.49, +2.17) and self-reported physical activity change (0.7% p.a., 95% CI +0.22, +1.22). Mother’s report of increasing their children’s calcium intake was associated with receiving the OPSMC (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4, 3.8) and feedback of high fracture risk (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2, 3.3). Fracture risk feedback based on BMD could potentially make an important contribution to osteoporosis prevention but confirmation of long-term benefits and cost effectiveness is needed before implementation can be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3257714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32577142012-01-17 Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? Winzenberg, Tania Oldenburg, Brian Jones, Graeme Nutrients Article Feedback of fracture risk based on bone mineral density (BMD) is an under-explored potential osteoporosis education intervention. We performed a randomised controlled trial of either an osteoporosis information leaflet or small group education (the Osteoporosis Prevention and Self-Management Course (OPSMC)), combined with individualised fracture risk feedback in premenopausal women over two years. Women with a mean T-score at spine and hip of <0 were informed they were at higher risk of fracture in later life and those with T-score ≥ 0 were informed they were not. Women receiving feedback of high fracture risk had a greater increase in femoral neck, but not lumbar spine, BMD compared to the low risk group (1.6% p.a. vs. 0.7% p.a., p = 0.0001). Participation in the OPSMC had no greater effect on BMD than receiving the leaflet. Femoral neck BMD change was associated with starting calcium supplements (1.3% p.a., 95% CI +0.49, +2.17) and self-reported physical activity change (0.7% p.a., 95% CI +0.22, +1.22). Mother’s report of increasing their children’s calcium intake was associated with receiving the OPSMC (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4, 3.8) and feedback of high fracture risk (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2, 3.3). Fracture risk feedback based on BMD could potentially make an important contribution to osteoporosis prevention but confirmation of long-term benefits and cost effectiveness is needed before implementation can be recommended. MDPI 2010-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3257714/ /pubmed/22254067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu2090985 Text en © 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Winzenberg, Tania Oldenburg, Brian Jones, Graeme Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? |
title | Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? |
title_full | Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? |
title_fullStr | Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? |
title_short | Bone Density Testing: An Under-Utilised and Under-Researched Health Education Tool for Osteoporosis Prevention? |
title_sort | bone density testing: an under-utilised and under-researched health education tool for osteoporosis prevention? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22254067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu2090985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winzenbergtania bonedensitytestinganunderutilisedandunderresearchedhealtheducationtoolforosteoporosisprevention AT oldenburgbrian bonedensitytestinganunderutilisedandunderresearchedhealtheducationtoolforosteoporosisprevention AT jonesgraeme bonedensitytestinganunderutilisedandunderresearchedhealtheducationtoolforosteoporosisprevention |