Cargando…

Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data

BACKGROUND: Anthropometric measures such as the body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference are widely used as convenient indices of adiposity, yet there are limitations in their estimates of body fat. We aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity using criteria based on the BMI and waist circum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasco, Julie A., Nicholson, Geoffrey C., Brennan, Sharon L., Kotowicz, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22253741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029580
_version_ 1782221255338885120
author Pasco, Julie A.
Nicholson, Geoffrey C.
Brennan, Sharon L.
Kotowicz, Mark A.
author_facet Pasco, Julie A.
Nicholson, Geoffrey C.
Brennan, Sharon L.
Kotowicz, Mark A.
author_sort Pasco, Julie A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anthropometric measures such as the body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference are widely used as convenient indices of adiposity, yet there are limitations in their estimates of body fat. We aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity using criteria based on the BMI and waist circumference, and to examine the relationship between the BMI and body fat. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. A random sample of 1,467 men and 1,076 women aged 20–96 years was assessed 2001–2008. Overweight and obesity were identified according to BMI (overweight 25.0–29.9 kg/m(2); obesity ≥30.0 kg/m(2)) and waist circumference (overweight men 94.0–101.9 cm; women 80.0–87.9 cm; obesity men ≥102.0 cm, women ≥88.0 cm); body fat mass was assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; height and weight were measured and lifestyle factors documented by self-report. According to the BMI, 45.1% (95%CI 42.4–47.9) of men and 30.2% (95%CI 27.4–33.0) of women were overweight and a further 20.2% (95%CI 18.0–22.4) of men and 28.6% (95%CI 25.8–31.3) of women were obese. Using waist circumference, 27.5% (95%CI 25.1–30.0) of men and 23.3% (95%CI 20.8–25.9) of women were overweight, and 29.3% (95%CI 26.9–31.7) of men and 44.1% (95%CI 41.2–47.1) of women, obese. Both criteria indicate that approximately 60% of the population exceeded recommended thresholds for healthy body habitus. There was no consistent pattern apparent between BMI and energy intake. Compared with women, BMI overestimated adiposity in men, whose excess weight was largely attributable to muscular body builds and greater bone mass. BMI also underestimated adiposity in the elderly. Regression models including gender, age and BMI explained 0.825 of the variance in percent body fat. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: As the BMI does not account for differences in body composition, we suggest that gender- and age-specific thresholds should be considered when the BMI is used to indicate adiposity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3258232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32582322012-01-17 Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data Pasco, Julie A. Nicholson, Geoffrey C. Brennan, Sharon L. Kotowicz, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Anthropometric measures such as the body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference are widely used as convenient indices of adiposity, yet there are limitations in their estimates of body fat. We aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity using criteria based on the BMI and waist circumference, and to examine the relationship between the BMI and body fat. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. A random sample of 1,467 men and 1,076 women aged 20–96 years was assessed 2001–2008. Overweight and obesity were identified according to BMI (overweight 25.0–29.9 kg/m(2); obesity ≥30.0 kg/m(2)) and waist circumference (overweight men 94.0–101.9 cm; women 80.0–87.9 cm; obesity men ≥102.0 cm, women ≥88.0 cm); body fat mass was assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; height and weight were measured and lifestyle factors documented by self-report. According to the BMI, 45.1% (95%CI 42.4–47.9) of men and 30.2% (95%CI 27.4–33.0) of women were overweight and a further 20.2% (95%CI 18.0–22.4) of men and 28.6% (95%CI 25.8–31.3) of women were obese. Using waist circumference, 27.5% (95%CI 25.1–30.0) of men and 23.3% (95%CI 20.8–25.9) of women were overweight, and 29.3% (95%CI 26.9–31.7) of men and 44.1% (95%CI 41.2–47.1) of women, obese. Both criteria indicate that approximately 60% of the population exceeded recommended thresholds for healthy body habitus. There was no consistent pattern apparent between BMI and energy intake. Compared with women, BMI overestimated adiposity in men, whose excess weight was largely attributable to muscular body builds and greater bone mass. BMI also underestimated adiposity in the elderly. Regression models including gender, age and BMI explained 0.825 of the variance in percent body fat. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: As the BMI does not account for differences in body composition, we suggest that gender- and age-specific thresholds should be considered when the BMI is used to indicate adiposity. Public Library of Science 2012-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3258232/ /pubmed/22253741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029580 Text en Pasco et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pasco, Julie A.
Nicholson, Geoffrey C.
Brennan, Sharon L.
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
title Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
title_full Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
title_fullStr Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
title_short Prevalence of Obesity and the Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Body Fat: Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Data
title_sort prevalence of obesity and the relationship between the body mass index and body fat: cross-sectional, population-based data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22253741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029580
work_keys_str_mv AT pascojuliea prevalenceofobesityandtherelationshipbetweenthebodymassindexandbodyfatcrosssectionalpopulationbaseddata
AT nicholsongeoffreyc prevalenceofobesityandtherelationshipbetweenthebodymassindexandbodyfatcrosssectionalpopulationbaseddata
AT brennansharonl prevalenceofobesityandtherelationshipbetweenthebodymassindexandbodyfatcrosssectionalpopulationbaseddata
AT kotowiczmarka prevalenceofobesityandtherelationshipbetweenthebodymassindexandbodyfatcrosssectionalpopulationbaseddata