Cargando…

Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status

INTRODUCTION: In women showing impaired fertility, a decreased response to ovarian stimulation is a major problem, limiting the number of oocytes to be used for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Despite the several definitions of poor response, it is still a matter of debate whether young poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nichi, Marcílio, de Cassia Sávio Figueira, Rita, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela, Souza Setti, Amanda, Iaconelli, Assumpto, Borges, Edson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291773
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.22084
_version_ 1782221301468889088
author Nichi, Marcílio
de Cassia Sávio Figueira, Rita
Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela
Souza Setti, Amanda
Iaconelli, Assumpto
Borges, Edson
author_facet Nichi, Marcílio
de Cassia Sávio Figueira, Rita
Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela
Souza Setti, Amanda
Iaconelli, Assumpto
Borges, Edson
author_sort Nichi, Marcílio
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In women showing impaired fertility, a decreased response to ovarian stimulation is a major problem, limiting the number of oocytes to be used for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Despite the several definitions of poor response, it is still a matter of debate whether young poor responder patients also show a decrease in oocyte quality. The objective in this study was to investigate whether poor ovarian response to the superstimulation protocol is accompanied by impaired oocyte quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 313 patients younger than 35 years old, undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Patients with four or fewer MII oocytes (poor-responder group, PR, n = 57) were age-matched with normoresponder patients (NR, n = 256). RESULTS: A higher rate of oocyte retrieval and a trend towards an increase in MII oocyte rate were observed in the NR group when compared to the PR group (71.6 ±1.1% and 74.1 ±1.0% vs. 56.3 ±2.9% and 66.5 ±3.7%; p< 0.0001 and p = 0.056, respectively). A trend toward increased implantation rates was observed in the NR group when compared to the PR group (44 and 24.5 ±2.0% vs. 28.8 and 16.4 ±3.9%; p= 0.0305 and p= 0.0651, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low response to ovarian stimulation is apparently not related to impaired oocyte quality. However, embryos produced from poor responder oocytes show impaired capacity to implant and to carry a pregnancy to term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3258723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32587232012-01-30 Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status Nichi, Marcílio de Cassia Sávio Figueira, Rita Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Souza Setti, Amanda Iaconelli, Assumpto Borges, Edson Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: In women showing impaired fertility, a decreased response to ovarian stimulation is a major problem, limiting the number of oocytes to be used for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Despite the several definitions of poor response, it is still a matter of debate whether young poor responder patients also show a decrease in oocyte quality. The objective in this study was to investigate whether poor ovarian response to the superstimulation protocol is accompanied by impaired oocyte quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 313 patients younger than 35 years old, undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Patients with four or fewer MII oocytes (poor-responder group, PR, n = 57) were age-matched with normoresponder patients (NR, n = 256). RESULTS: A higher rate of oocyte retrieval and a trend towards an increase in MII oocyte rate were observed in the NR group when compared to the PR group (71.6 ±1.1% and 74.1 ±1.0% vs. 56.3 ±2.9% and 66.5 ±3.7%; p< 0.0001 and p = 0.056, respectively). A trend toward increased implantation rates was observed in the NR group when compared to the PR group (44 and 24.5 ±2.0% vs. 28.8 and 16.4 ±3.9%; p= 0.0305 and p= 0.0651, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low response to ovarian stimulation is apparently not related to impaired oocyte quality. However, embryos produced from poor responder oocytes show impaired capacity to implant and to carry a pregnancy to term. Termedia Publishing House 2011-04 2011-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3258723/ /pubmed/22291773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.22084 Text en Copyright © 2011 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Nichi, Marcílio
de Cassia Sávio Figueira, Rita
Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela
Souza Setti, Amanda
Iaconelli, Assumpto
Borges, Edson
Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
title Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
title_full Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
title_fullStr Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
title_full_unstemmed Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
title_short Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
title_sort decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291773
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.22084
work_keys_str_mv AT nichimarcilio decreasedfertilityinpoorresponderwomenisnotrelatedtooocytemorphologicalstatus
AT decassiasaviofigueirarita decreasedfertilityinpoorresponderwomenisnotrelatedtooocytemorphologicalstatus
AT paesdealmeidaferreirabragadaniela decreasedfertilityinpoorresponderwomenisnotrelatedtooocytemorphologicalstatus
AT souzasettiamanda decreasedfertilityinpoorresponderwomenisnotrelatedtooocytemorphologicalstatus
AT iaconelliassumpto decreasedfertilityinpoorresponderwomenisnotrelatedtooocytemorphologicalstatus
AT borgesedson decreasedfertilityinpoorresponderwomenisnotrelatedtooocytemorphologicalstatus