Cargando…
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural ropivacaine 0.15%, levobupivacaine 0.15% and ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml, used with a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device after Caesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.24140 |
_version_ | 1782221310729912320 |
---|---|
author | Matsota, Paraskevi Batistaki, Chrysanthi Apostolaki, Stylliani Kostopanagiotou, Georgia |
author_facet | Matsota, Paraskevi Batistaki, Chrysanthi Apostolaki, Stylliani Kostopanagiotou, Georgia |
author_sort | Matsota, Paraskevi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural ropivacaine 0.15%, levobupivacaine 0.15% and ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml, used with a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device after Caesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty women undergoing elective Caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were enrolled. Postoperatively, patients received PCEA with either ropivacaine or levobupivacaine 0.15% (basal rate 6 ml/h, bolus 5 ml/20 min), or ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml (basal rate 6 ml/h, bolus 4 ml/20 min). Sympathetic and sensory level of analgesia, motor ability (Bromage 0-3), and pain scores at rest, movement and cough (VAS 0-10), haemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, side effects and total doses of local anaesthetic were documented every 6 h for 24 h. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a descriptive scale. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in pain scores at all time intervals. A significantly higher sympathetic and sensory blockade occurred with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.15% compared to ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl, with no significant difference in total local analgesic consumption at 24 h (p = 0.08). Rescue analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups (p = 0.8) while patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher in the ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl group (p = 0.02). Haemodynamics, oxygenation, nausea, pruritus and numbness did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dilute local anaesthetic solutions provided satisfactory postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section when used with a PCEA device. The combination of ropivacaine 0.15% with fentanyl 2 µg/ml appeared superior, since it provided higher patient satisfaction with statistically equal pain scores and local anaesthetic consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3258763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32587632012-01-30 Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study Matsota, Paraskevi Batistaki, Chrysanthi Apostolaki, Stylliani Kostopanagiotou, Georgia Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural ropivacaine 0.15%, levobupivacaine 0.15% and ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml, used with a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device after Caesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty women undergoing elective Caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were enrolled. Postoperatively, patients received PCEA with either ropivacaine or levobupivacaine 0.15% (basal rate 6 ml/h, bolus 5 ml/20 min), or ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml (basal rate 6 ml/h, bolus 4 ml/20 min). Sympathetic and sensory level of analgesia, motor ability (Bromage 0-3), and pain scores at rest, movement and cough (VAS 0-10), haemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, side effects and total doses of local anaesthetic were documented every 6 h for 24 h. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a descriptive scale. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in pain scores at all time intervals. A significantly higher sympathetic and sensory blockade occurred with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.15% compared to ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl, with no significant difference in total local analgesic consumption at 24 h (p = 0.08). Rescue analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups (p = 0.8) while patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher in the ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl group (p = 0.02). Haemodynamics, oxygenation, nausea, pruritus and numbness did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dilute local anaesthetic solutions provided satisfactory postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section when used with a PCEA device. The combination of ropivacaine 0.15% with fentanyl 2 µg/ml appeared superior, since it provided higher patient satisfaction with statistically equal pain scores and local anaesthetic consumption. Termedia Publishing House 2011-08 2011-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3258763/ /pubmed/22291806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.24140 Text en Copyright © 2011 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Matsota, Paraskevi Batistaki, Chrysanthi Apostolaki, Stylliani Kostopanagiotou, Georgia Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
title | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
title_full | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
title_short | Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
title_sort | patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.24140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsotaparaskevi patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaaftercaesareansectionlevobupivacaine015versusropivacaine015aloneorcombinedwithfentanyl2μgmlacomparativestudy AT batistakichrysanthi patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaaftercaesareansectionlevobupivacaine015versusropivacaine015aloneorcombinedwithfentanyl2μgmlacomparativestudy AT apostolakistylliani patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaaftercaesareansectionlevobupivacaine015versusropivacaine015aloneorcombinedwithfentanyl2μgmlacomparativestudy AT kostopanagiotougeorgia patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaaftercaesareansectionlevobupivacaine015versusropivacaine015aloneorcombinedwithfentanyl2μgmlacomparativestudy |