Cargando…

Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction

INTRODUCTION: Induced sputum is widely used in clinical practice and scientific studies. This technique has become enormously useful in assessment of airway inflammation. However, some asthmatics are unable to expectorate sputum of sufficient quality and quantity necessary for further processing, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majewski, Sebastian, Cichocki, Piotr, Stępnicka-Bindemann, Małgorzata, Górski, Paweł
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291829
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.25559
_version_ 1782221320024489984
author Majewski, Sebastian
Cichocki, Piotr
Stępnicka-Bindemann, Małgorzata
Górski, Paweł
author_facet Majewski, Sebastian
Cichocki, Piotr
Stępnicka-Bindemann, Małgorzata
Górski, Paweł
author_sort Majewski, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Induced sputum is widely used in clinical practice and scientific studies. This technique has become enormously useful in assessment of airway inflammation. However, some asthmatics are unable to expectorate sputum of sufficient quality and quantity necessary for further processing, therefore not providing reliable results. This research study aimed to examine whether asthma control and asthma quality of life influence the results of sputum induction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourty-seven adult subjects, current non-smokers with symptomatic asthma, were studied. All participants underwent clinical assessment, skin prick testing, spirometry and sputum induction. Before sputum induction, subjects were asked to fill in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). RESULTS: Twenty-nine (62%) subjects produced sputum eligible for processing. This group had a significantly lower ACQ score (0.83 ±0.65 vs. 1.37 ±0.77; p = 0.02), higher MiniAQLQ total score (5.67 ±0.99 vs. 4.86 ±1.07; p = 0.011), higher MiniAQLQ symptoms domain score (5.54 ±1.13 vs. 4.63 ±1.24; p = 0.013) and higher MiniAQLQ activity limitations domain score (6.08 ±0.92 vs. 5.07 ±1.37; p= 0.014). The noted differences between groups of patients were not only statistically but were clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that successful sputum induction may be expected in patients with better asthma control and better quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3258803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32588032012-01-30 Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction Majewski, Sebastian Cichocki, Piotr Stępnicka-Bindemann, Małgorzata Górski, Paweł Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Induced sputum is widely used in clinical practice and scientific studies. This technique has become enormously useful in assessment of airway inflammation. However, some asthmatics are unable to expectorate sputum of sufficient quality and quantity necessary for further processing, therefore not providing reliable results. This research study aimed to examine whether asthma control and asthma quality of life influence the results of sputum induction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourty-seven adult subjects, current non-smokers with symptomatic asthma, were studied. All participants underwent clinical assessment, skin prick testing, spirometry and sputum induction. Before sputum induction, subjects were asked to fill in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). RESULTS: Twenty-nine (62%) subjects produced sputum eligible for processing. This group had a significantly lower ACQ score (0.83 ±0.65 vs. 1.37 ±0.77; p = 0.02), higher MiniAQLQ total score (5.67 ±0.99 vs. 4.86 ±1.07; p = 0.011), higher MiniAQLQ symptoms domain score (5.54 ±1.13 vs. 4.63 ±1.24; p = 0.013) and higher MiniAQLQ activity limitations domain score (6.08 ±0.92 vs. 5.07 ±1.37; p= 0.014). The noted differences between groups of patients were not only statistically but were clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that successful sputum induction may be expected in patients with better asthma control and better quality of life. Termedia Publishing House 2011-11-08 2011-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3258803/ /pubmed/22291829 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.25559 Text en Copyright © 2011 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Majewski, Sebastian
Cichocki, Piotr
Stępnicka-Bindemann, Małgorzata
Górski, Paweł
Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
title Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
title_full Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
title_fullStr Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
title_full_unstemmed Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
title_short Asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
title_sort asthma control, quality of life and successful sputum induction
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291829
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.25559
work_keys_str_mv AT majewskisebastian asthmacontrolqualityoflifeandsuccessfulsputuminduction
AT cichockipiotr asthmacontrolqualityoflifeandsuccessfulsputuminduction
AT stepnickabindemannmałgorzata asthmacontrolqualityoflifeandsuccessfulsputuminduction
AT gorskipaweł asthmacontrolqualityoflifeandsuccessfulsputuminduction