Cargando…

Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales

The validity of a systematic review depends on completeness of identifying randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and the quality of the included RCTs. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of hand search on the number of identified RCTs and of four quality lists on the outcome of quality asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craane, Bart, Dijkstra, Pieter Ubele, Stappaerts, Karel, De Laat, Antoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21128088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0490-y
_version_ 1782221364450557952
author Craane, Bart
Dijkstra, Pieter Ubele
Stappaerts, Karel
De Laat, Antoon
author_facet Craane, Bart
Dijkstra, Pieter Ubele
Stappaerts, Karel
De Laat, Antoon
author_sort Craane, Bart
collection PubMed
description The validity of a systematic review depends on completeness of identifying randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and the quality of the included RCTs. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of hand search on the number of identified RCTs and of four quality lists on the outcome of quality assessment of RCTs evaluating the effect of physical therapy on temporomandibular disorders. In addition, we investigated the association between publication year and the methodological quality of these RCTs. Cochrane, Medline and Embase databases were searched electronically. The references of the included studies were checked for additional trials. Studies not electronically identified were labelled as “obtained by means of hand search”. The included RCTs (69) concerning physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders were assessed using four different quality lists: the Delphi list, the Jadad list, the Megens & Harris list and the Risk of Bias list. The association between the quality scores and the year of publication were calculated. After electronic database search, hand search resulted in an additional 17 RCTs (25%). The mean quality score of the RCTs, expressed as a percentage of the maximum score, was low to moderate and varied from 35.1% for the Delphi list to 54.3% for the Risk of Bias list. The agreement among the four quality assessment lists, calculated by the Interclass Correlation Coefficient, was 0.603 (95% CI, 0.389; 0.749). The Delphi list scored significantly lower than the other lists. The Risk of Bias list scored significantly higher than the Jadad list. A moderate association was found between year of publication and scores on the Delphi list (r = 0.50), the Jadad list (r = 0.33) and the Megens & Harris list (r = 0.43). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0490-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3259329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32593292012-01-31 Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales Craane, Bart Dijkstra, Pieter Ubele Stappaerts, Karel De Laat, Antoon Clin Oral Investig Original Article The validity of a systematic review depends on completeness of identifying randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and the quality of the included RCTs. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of hand search on the number of identified RCTs and of four quality lists on the outcome of quality assessment of RCTs evaluating the effect of physical therapy on temporomandibular disorders. In addition, we investigated the association between publication year and the methodological quality of these RCTs. Cochrane, Medline and Embase databases were searched electronically. The references of the included studies were checked for additional trials. Studies not electronically identified were labelled as “obtained by means of hand search”. The included RCTs (69) concerning physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders were assessed using four different quality lists: the Delphi list, the Jadad list, the Megens & Harris list and the Risk of Bias list. The association between the quality scores and the year of publication were calculated. After electronic database search, hand search resulted in an additional 17 RCTs (25%). The mean quality score of the RCTs, expressed as a percentage of the maximum score, was low to moderate and varied from 35.1% for the Delphi list to 54.3% for the Risk of Bias list. The agreement among the four quality assessment lists, calculated by the Interclass Correlation Coefficient, was 0.603 (95% CI, 0.389; 0.749). The Delphi list scored significantly lower than the other lists. The Risk of Bias list scored significantly higher than the Jadad list. A moderate association was found between year of publication and scores on the Delphi list (r = 0.50), the Jadad list (r = 0.33) and the Megens & Harris list (r = 0.43). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0490-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2010-12-03 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3259329/ /pubmed/21128088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0490-y Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Craane, Bart
Dijkstra, Pieter Ubele
Stappaerts, Karel
De Laat, Antoon
Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
title Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
title_full Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
title_fullStr Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
title_full_unstemmed Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
title_short Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
title_sort methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21128088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0490-y
work_keys_str_mv AT craanebart methodologicalqualityofasystematicreviewonphysicaltherapyfortemporomandibulardisordersinfluenceofhandsearchandqualityscales
AT dijkstrapieterubele methodologicalqualityofasystematicreviewonphysicaltherapyfortemporomandibulardisordersinfluenceofhandsearchandqualityscales
AT stappaertskarel methodologicalqualityofasystematicreviewonphysicaltherapyfortemporomandibulardisordersinfluenceofhandsearchandqualityscales
AT delaatantoon methodologicalqualityofasystematicreviewonphysicaltherapyfortemporomandibulardisordersinfluenceofhandsearchandqualityscales