Cargando…
Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiology teaching offered to junior doctors on general medical/surgical rotations, their preferences regarding teaching methods and self-directed learning tools, and their suggestions for improvement. METHODS: An online questionnaire involving all foundation programme doctor...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0052-5 |
_version_ | 1782221371338653696 |
---|---|
author | Nyhsen, Christiane M. Lawson, Cathy Higginson, Jim |
author_facet | Nyhsen, Christiane M. Lawson, Cathy Higginson, Jim |
author_sort | Nyhsen, Christiane M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiology teaching offered to junior doctors on general medical/surgical rotations, their preferences regarding teaching methods and self-directed learning tools, and their suggestions for improvement. METHODS: An online questionnaire involving all foundation programme doctors at Sunderland Royal Hospital was carried out. Quantitative analysis of preferences and free text feedback were used. RESULTS: There was a response rate of 88/90 doctors (98%). The radiology teaching received was mostly informal. Most junior doctors felt that their medical school radiology teaching had been inadequate. The preferred teaching techniques were interactive case-based and system-based discussions. Textbooks and journal articles were not as popular as self-directed learning tools. Online learning material was used quite frequently, with general web content being more popular. Eighty-seven percent cited their motivation for studying radiology as “to become a better doctor”. More guidance from radiologists was desired, particularly regarding the choice of examinations and discussion of cases. Twenty-two percent of doctors were considering radiology as a career. CONCLUSIONS: Interactive elements in radiology teaching are important. Online electronic teaching modules can be integrated into the teaching curriculum, but they must be of high quality to be acceptable and face-to-face interaction is still important. Junior doctors would like more guidance from radiologists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3259358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32593582012-02-17 Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement Nyhsen, Christiane M. Lawson, Cathy Higginson, Jim Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiology teaching offered to junior doctors on general medical/surgical rotations, their preferences regarding teaching methods and self-directed learning tools, and their suggestions for improvement. METHODS: An online questionnaire involving all foundation programme doctors at Sunderland Royal Hospital was carried out. Quantitative analysis of preferences and free text feedback were used. RESULTS: There was a response rate of 88/90 doctors (98%). The radiology teaching received was mostly informal. Most junior doctors felt that their medical school radiology teaching had been inadequate. The preferred teaching techniques were interactive case-based and system-based discussions. Textbooks and journal articles were not as popular as self-directed learning tools. Online learning material was used quite frequently, with general web content being more popular. Eighty-seven percent cited their motivation for studying radiology as “to become a better doctor”. More guidance from radiologists was desired, particularly regarding the choice of examinations and discussion of cases. Twenty-two percent of doctors were considering radiology as a career. CONCLUSIONS: Interactive elements in radiology teaching are important. Online electronic teaching modules can be integrated into the teaching curriculum, but they must be of high quality to be acceptable and face-to-face interaction is still important. Junior doctors would like more guidance from radiologists. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3259358/ /pubmed/22347952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0052-5 Text en © European Society of Radiology 2011 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nyhsen, Christiane M. Lawson, Cathy Higginson, Jim Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
title | Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
title_full | Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
title_fullStr | Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
title_short | Radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
title_sort | radiology teaching for junior doctors: their expectations, preferences and suggestions for improvement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0052-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nyhsenchristianem radiologyteachingforjuniordoctorstheirexpectationspreferencesandsuggestionsforimprovement AT lawsoncathy radiologyteachingforjuniordoctorstheirexpectationspreferencesandsuggestionsforimprovement AT higginsonjim radiologyteachingforjuniordoctorstheirexpectationspreferencesandsuggestionsforimprovement |