Cargando…

How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey

OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosmans, Jan M. L., Peremans, Lieve, De Schepper, Arthur M., Duyck, Philippe O., Parizel, Paul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z
_version_ 1782221373857333248
author Bosmans, Jan M. L.
Peremans, Lieve
De Schepper, Arthur M.
Duyck, Philippe O.
Parizel, Paul M.
author_facet Bosmans, Jan M. L.
Peremans, Lieve
De Schepper, Arthur M.
Duyck, Philippe O.
Parizel, Paul M.
author_sort Bosmans, Jan M. L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed. RESULTS: Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9%), 233 (31.7%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting. CONCLUSION: Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3259369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32593692012-02-17 How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey Bosmans, Jan M. L. Peremans, Lieve De Schepper, Arthur M. Duyck, Philippe O. Parizel, Paul M. Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed. RESULTS: Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9%), 233 (31.7%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting. CONCLUSION: Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting. Springer-Verlag 2011-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3259369/ /pubmed/22347977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z Text en © European Society of Radiology 2011
spellingShingle Original Article
Bosmans, Jan M. L.
Peremans, Lieve
De Schepper, Arthur M.
Duyck, Philippe O.
Parizel, Paul M.
How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
title How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
title_full How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
title_fullStr How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
title_full_unstemmed How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
title_short How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
title_sort how do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? suggestions from the cover survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bosmansjanml howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey
AT peremanslieve howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey
AT deschepperarthurm howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey
AT duyckphilippeo howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey
AT parizelpaulm howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey