Cargando…
How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey
OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z |
_version_ | 1782221373857333248 |
---|---|
author | Bosmans, Jan M. L. Peremans, Lieve De Schepper, Arthur M. Duyck, Philippe O. Parizel, Paul M. |
author_facet | Bosmans, Jan M. L. Peremans, Lieve De Schepper, Arthur M. Duyck, Philippe O. Parizel, Paul M. |
author_sort | Bosmans, Jan M. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed. RESULTS: Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9%), 233 (31.7%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting. CONCLUSION: Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3259369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32593692012-02-17 How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey Bosmans, Jan M. L. Peremans, Lieve De Schepper, Arthur M. Duyck, Philippe O. Parizel, Paul M. Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of radiology reports can be improved. METHODS: At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER survey, a bi-national quantitative survey on the radiology report among referring physicians, clinical specialists and general practitioners were able to freely enter suggestions with regard to improving the quality of the report. These suggestions were isolated from the quantitative results. Subjects and themes were identified, examined, ordered, counted, compared and analysed. RESULTS: Of a total of 3,884 invitations to participate, we received 735 response forms from clinicians (18.9%), 233 (31.7%) of which contained suggestions. Issues mentioned most frequently were the need for clinical information and a clinical question, for a conclusion, structuring, communicating directly with the clinician, completeness, integrating images or referring to images, mentioning relevant findings outside of the clinical question, mentioning a diagnosis or suitable differential diagnosis, and concise reporting. CONCLUSION: Although these spontaneous suggestions are erratic and sometimes contradictory, they summarise the ideas as well as the emotions of these clients of the radiology department. Therefore it is advisable to take them into account when developing new ways of reporting. Springer-Verlag 2011-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3259369/ /pubmed/22347977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z Text en © European Society of Radiology 2011 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bosmans, Jan M. L. Peremans, Lieve De Schepper, Arthur M. Duyck, Philippe O. Parizel, Paul M. How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey |
title | How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey |
title_full | How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey |
title_fullStr | How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey |
title_full_unstemmed | How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey |
title_short | How do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey |
title_sort | how do referring clinicians want radiologists to report? suggestions from the cover survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosmansjanml howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey AT peremanslieve howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey AT deschepperarthurm howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey AT duyckphilippeo howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey AT parizelpaulm howdoreferringclinicianswantradiologiststoreportsuggestionsfromthecoversurvey |