Cargando…

Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey

OBJECTIVES: The role of the Consultant Radiologist has changed substantially in recent decades, yet manpower planning is often based on older inappropriate methods of measuring Radiologist workload. We report a nationwide survey of Consultant Radiologist workload in Ireland in 2009. METHODS: Relativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brady, Adrian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0094-3
_version_ 1782221374311366656
author Brady, Adrian P.
author_facet Brady, Adrian P.
author_sort Brady, Adrian P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The role of the Consultant Radiologist has changed substantially in recent decades, yet manpower planning is often based on older inappropriate methods of measuring Radiologist workload. We report a nationwide survey of Consultant Radiologist workload in Ireland in 2009. METHODS: Relative value units (RVUs) were assigned to easily countable studies. Hospitals’ activity was collated for the full calendar year of 2009. Radiologist time engaged in activities not easily counted (interventional and procedural work, multi-disciplinary meetings, teaching, administration, etc.) was separately measured. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 28 of 38 public hospital radiology departments. Mean Consultant Radiologist workload across all hospitals was 57,659.1 crude RVUs/WTE and 103,987 net RVUs/WTE. A mean of 32.47% of WTEs are engaged in non-countable activity. Means of 85.35% and 65.73% of the required numbers of WTEs were available in 2009 to achieve respectively annual crude and net RVU/WTE figures of 45,000. Excluding Specialist Centres, plain films accounted for 28–41% of recorded activity, mammography for 0.8–5.8%, US for 16–20%, CT for 27–32% and MR for 5.9–15.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Irish Consultant Radiologist staffing levels are well below appropriate international benchmarks for the current workload. Approximately one-third of radiologist time is engaged in activity not easily counted in study numbers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3259371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32593712012-02-17 Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey Brady, Adrian P. Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The role of the Consultant Radiologist has changed substantially in recent decades, yet manpower planning is often based on older inappropriate methods of measuring Radiologist workload. We report a nationwide survey of Consultant Radiologist workload in Ireland in 2009. METHODS: Relative value units (RVUs) were assigned to easily countable studies. Hospitals’ activity was collated for the full calendar year of 2009. Radiologist time engaged in activities not easily counted (interventional and procedural work, multi-disciplinary meetings, teaching, administration, etc.) was separately measured. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 28 of 38 public hospital radiology departments. Mean Consultant Radiologist workload across all hospitals was 57,659.1 crude RVUs/WTE and 103,987 net RVUs/WTE. A mean of 32.47% of WTEs are engaged in non-countable activity. Means of 85.35% and 65.73% of the required numbers of WTEs were available in 2009 to achieve respectively annual crude and net RVU/WTE figures of 45,000. Excluding Specialist Centres, plain films accounted for 28–41% of recorded activity, mammography for 0.8–5.8%, US for 16–20%, CT for 27–32% and MR for 5.9–15.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Irish Consultant Radiologist staffing levels are well below appropriate international benchmarks for the current workload. Approximately one-third of radiologist time is engaged in activity not easily counted in study numbers. Springer-Verlag 2011-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3259371/ /pubmed/22347951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0094-3 Text en © European Society of Radiology 2011
spellingShingle Original Article
Brady, Adrian P.
Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
title Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
title_full Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
title_fullStr Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
title_short Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
title_sort measuring consultant radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0094-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bradyadrianp measuringconsultantradiologistworkloadmethodandresultsfromanationalsurvey