Cargando…

Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging

BACKGROUND: 18F-FDG is a glucose analogue that is taken up by a wide range of malignancies. 18F-FDG PET-CT is now firmly established as an accurate method for the staging and restaging of various cancers. However, 18F-FDG also accumulates in normal tissue and other non-malignant conditions, and some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Niamh M., Smith, Clare S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0062-3
_version_ 1782221378734260224
author Long, Niamh M.
Smith, Clare S.
author_facet Long, Niamh M.
Smith, Clare S.
author_sort Long, Niamh M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 18F-FDG is a glucose analogue that is taken up by a wide range of malignancies. 18F-FDG PET-CT is now firmly established as an accurate method for the staging and restaging of various cancers. However, 18F-FDG also accumulates in normal tissue and other non-malignant conditions, and some malignancies do not take up F18-FDG or have a low affinity for the tracer, leading to false-positive and false-negative interpretations. METHODS: PET-CT allows for the correlation of two separate imaging modalities, combining both morphological and metabolic information. We should use the CT to help interpret the PET findings. In this article we will highlight specific false-negative and false-positive findings that one should be aware of when interpreting oncology scans. RESULTS: We aim to highlight post-treatment conditions that are encountered routinely on restaging scans that can lead to false-positive interpretations. We will emphasise the importance of using the CT component to help recognise these entities to allow improved diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: In light of the increased use of PET-CT, it is important that nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists be aware of these conditions and correlate the PET and CT components to avoid misdiagnosis, over staging of disease and unnecessary biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3259390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32593902012-02-17 Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging Long, Niamh M. Smith, Clare S. Insights Imaging Pictorial Review BACKGROUND: 18F-FDG is a glucose analogue that is taken up by a wide range of malignancies. 18F-FDG PET-CT is now firmly established as an accurate method for the staging and restaging of various cancers. However, 18F-FDG also accumulates in normal tissue and other non-malignant conditions, and some malignancies do not take up F18-FDG or have a low affinity for the tracer, leading to false-positive and false-negative interpretations. METHODS: PET-CT allows for the correlation of two separate imaging modalities, combining both morphological and metabolic information. We should use the CT to help interpret the PET findings. In this article we will highlight specific false-negative and false-positive findings that one should be aware of when interpreting oncology scans. RESULTS: We aim to highlight post-treatment conditions that are encountered routinely on restaging scans that can lead to false-positive interpretations. We will emphasise the importance of using the CT component to help recognise these entities to allow improved diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: In light of the increased use of PET-CT, it is important that nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists be aware of these conditions and correlate the PET and CT components to avoid misdiagnosis, over staging of disease and unnecessary biopsies. Springer-Verlag 2011-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3259390/ /pubmed/22347986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0062-3 Text en © European Society of Radiology 2010
spellingShingle Pictorial Review
Long, Niamh M.
Smith, Clare S.
Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging
title Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging
title_full Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging
title_fullStr Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging
title_full_unstemmed Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging
title_short Causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)F-PET/CT in oncologic imaging
title_sort causes and imaging features of false positives and false negatives on (18)f-pet/ct in oncologic imaging
topic Pictorial Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0062-3
work_keys_str_mv AT longniamhm causesandimagingfeaturesoffalsepositivesandfalsenegativeson18fpetctinoncologicimaging
AT smithclares causesandimagingfeaturesoffalsepositivesandfalsenegativeson18fpetctinoncologicimaging