Cargando…
Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs
In the late stages of the global dispersal of dogs, dingoes appear in the Australian archaeological record 3500 years BP, and dogs were one of three domesticates brought with the colonization of Polynesia, but the introduction routes to this region remain unknown. This also relates to questions abou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21900326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1395 |
_version_ | 1782221421869531136 |
---|---|
author | Oskarsson, Mattias C. R. Klütsch, Cornelya F. C. Boonyaprakob, Ukadej Wilton, Alan Tanabe, Yuichi Savolainen, Peter |
author_facet | Oskarsson, Mattias C. R. Klütsch, Cornelya F. C. Boonyaprakob, Ukadej Wilton, Alan Tanabe, Yuichi Savolainen, Peter |
author_sort | Oskarsson, Mattias C. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the late stages of the global dispersal of dogs, dingoes appear in the Australian archaeological record 3500 years BP, and dogs were one of three domesticates brought with the colonization of Polynesia, but the introduction routes to this region remain unknown. This also relates to questions about human history, such as to what extent the Polynesian culture was introduced with the Austronesian expansion from Taiwan or adopted en route, and whether pre-Neolithic Australia was culturally influenced by the surrounding Neolithic world. We investigate these questions by mapping the distribution of the mtDNA founder haplotypes for dingoes (A29) and ancient Polynesian dogs (Arc1 and Arc2) in samples across Southern East Asia (n = 424) and Island Southeast Asia (n = 219). All three haplotypes were found in South China, Mainland Southeast Asia and Indonesia but absent in Taiwan and the Philippines, and the mtDNA diversity among dingoes indicates an introduction to Australia 4600–18 300 years BP. These results suggest that Australian dingoes and Polynesian dogs originate from dogs introduced to Indonesia via Mainland Southeast Asia before the Neolithic, and not from Taiwan together with the Austronesian expansion. This underscores the complex origins of Polynesian culture and the isolation from Neolithic influence of the pre-Neolithic Australian culture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3259930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32599302012-01-18 Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs Oskarsson, Mattias C. R. Klütsch, Cornelya F. C. Boonyaprakob, Ukadej Wilton, Alan Tanabe, Yuichi Savolainen, Peter Proc Biol Sci Research Articles In the late stages of the global dispersal of dogs, dingoes appear in the Australian archaeological record 3500 years BP, and dogs were one of three domesticates brought with the colonization of Polynesia, but the introduction routes to this region remain unknown. This also relates to questions about human history, such as to what extent the Polynesian culture was introduced with the Austronesian expansion from Taiwan or adopted en route, and whether pre-Neolithic Australia was culturally influenced by the surrounding Neolithic world. We investigate these questions by mapping the distribution of the mtDNA founder haplotypes for dingoes (A29) and ancient Polynesian dogs (Arc1 and Arc2) in samples across Southern East Asia (n = 424) and Island Southeast Asia (n = 219). All three haplotypes were found in South China, Mainland Southeast Asia and Indonesia but absent in Taiwan and the Philippines, and the mtDNA diversity among dingoes indicates an introduction to Australia 4600–18 300 years BP. These results suggest that Australian dingoes and Polynesian dogs originate from dogs introduced to Indonesia via Mainland Southeast Asia before the Neolithic, and not from Taiwan together with the Austronesian expansion. This underscores the complex origins of Polynesian culture and the isolation from Neolithic influence of the pre-Neolithic Australian culture. The Royal Society 2012-03-07 2011-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3259930/ /pubmed/21900326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1395 Text en This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Oskarsson, Mattias C. R. Klütsch, Cornelya F. C. Boonyaprakob, Ukadej Wilton, Alan Tanabe, Yuichi Savolainen, Peter Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs |
title | Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs |
title_full | Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs |
title_fullStr | Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs |
title_short | Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through Mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs |
title_sort | mitochondrial dna data indicate an introduction through mainland southeast asia for australian dingoes and polynesian domestic dogs |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21900326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oskarssonmattiascr mitochondrialdnadataindicateanintroductionthroughmainlandsoutheastasiaforaustraliandingoesandpolynesiandomesticdogs AT klutschcornelyafc mitochondrialdnadataindicateanintroductionthroughmainlandsoutheastasiaforaustraliandingoesandpolynesiandomesticdogs AT boonyaprakobukadej mitochondrialdnadataindicateanintroductionthroughmainlandsoutheastasiaforaustraliandingoesandpolynesiandomesticdogs AT wiltonalan mitochondrialdnadataindicateanintroductionthroughmainlandsoutheastasiaforaustraliandingoesandpolynesiandomesticdogs AT tanabeyuichi mitochondrialdnadataindicateanintroductionthroughmainlandsoutheastasiaforaustraliandingoesandpolynesiandomesticdogs AT savolainenpeter mitochondrialdnadataindicateanintroductionthroughmainlandsoutheastasiaforaustraliandingoesandpolynesiandomesticdogs |