Cargando…
The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
BACKGROUND: A substantial prevalence of mild neurocognitive disorders has been reported in HIV, also in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This includes a new disorder that has been termed asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). DISCUSSION: ANI is identified by pe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-356 |
_version_ | 1782221436699541504 |
---|---|
author | Gisslén, Magnus Price, Richard W Nilsson, Staffan |
author_facet | Gisslén, Magnus Price, Richard W Nilsson, Staffan |
author_sort | Gisslén, Magnus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A substantial prevalence of mild neurocognitive disorders has been reported in HIV, also in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This includes a new disorder that has been termed asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). DISCUSSION: ANI is identified by performance on formal neuropsychological testing that is at least 1 SD below the mean of normative scores in at least two cognitive domains out of at least five examined in patients without associated symptoms or evident functional impairment in daily living. While two tests are recommended to assess each domain, only one is required to fulfill this diagnostic criterion. Unfortunately, this definition necessitates that about 20% of the cognitively normal HIV-infected population is classified as suffering ANI. This liberal definition raises important ethical concerns and has as well diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Since neither its biological substrate, prognostic significance nor therapeutic implications are clearly established, we recommend that this diagnosis be modified or applied cautiously. SUMMARY: The diagnoses of less severe forms of neurocognitive disorders in HIV relies on the outcomes of neuropsychological testing, and a high proportion of HIV-infected patients with effective cART may be classified as neurocognitively abnormal using the current criteria. The definition of ANI is not stringent, and results in approximately 20% of the population being classified as abnormal. To us this seems an unacceptable false-positive rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3260107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32601072012-01-18 The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? Gisslén, Magnus Price, Richard W Nilsson, Staffan BMC Infect Dis Debate BACKGROUND: A substantial prevalence of mild neurocognitive disorders has been reported in HIV, also in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This includes a new disorder that has been termed asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). DISCUSSION: ANI is identified by performance on formal neuropsychological testing that is at least 1 SD below the mean of normative scores in at least two cognitive domains out of at least five examined in patients without associated symptoms or evident functional impairment in daily living. While two tests are recommended to assess each domain, only one is required to fulfill this diagnostic criterion. Unfortunately, this definition necessitates that about 20% of the cognitively normal HIV-infected population is classified as suffering ANI. This liberal definition raises important ethical concerns and has as well diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Since neither its biological substrate, prognostic significance nor therapeutic implications are clearly established, we recommend that this diagnosis be modified or applied cautiously. SUMMARY: The diagnoses of less severe forms of neurocognitive disorders in HIV relies on the outcomes of neuropsychological testing, and a high proportion of HIV-infected patients with effective cART may be classified as neurocognitively abnormal using the current criteria. The definition of ANI is not stringent, and results in approximately 20% of the population being classified as abnormal. To us this seems an unacceptable false-positive rate. BioMed Central 2011-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3260107/ /pubmed/22204557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-356 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gisslén et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Gisslén, Magnus Price, Richard W Nilsson, Staffan The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
title | The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
title_full | The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
title_fullStr | The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
title_full_unstemmed | The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
title_short | The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
title_sort | definition of hiv-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gisslenmagnus thedefinitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence AT pricerichardw thedefinitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence AT nilssonstaffan thedefinitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence AT gisslenmagnus definitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence AT pricerichardw definitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence AT nilssonstaffan definitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence |