Cargando…

The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?

BACKGROUND: A substantial prevalence of mild neurocognitive disorders has been reported in HIV, also in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This includes a new disorder that has been termed asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). DISCUSSION: ANI is identified by pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gisslén, Magnus, Price, Richard W, Nilsson, Staffan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-356
_version_ 1782221436699541504
author Gisslén, Magnus
Price, Richard W
Nilsson, Staffan
author_facet Gisslén, Magnus
Price, Richard W
Nilsson, Staffan
author_sort Gisslén, Magnus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A substantial prevalence of mild neurocognitive disorders has been reported in HIV, also in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This includes a new disorder that has been termed asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). DISCUSSION: ANI is identified by performance on formal neuropsychological testing that is at least 1 SD below the mean of normative scores in at least two cognitive domains out of at least five examined in patients without associated symptoms or evident functional impairment in daily living. While two tests are recommended to assess each domain, only one is required to fulfill this diagnostic criterion. Unfortunately, this definition necessitates that about 20% of the cognitively normal HIV-infected population is classified as suffering ANI. This liberal definition raises important ethical concerns and has as well diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Since neither its biological substrate, prognostic significance nor therapeutic implications are clearly established, we recommend that this diagnosis be modified or applied cautiously. SUMMARY: The diagnoses of less severe forms of neurocognitive disorders in HIV relies on the outcomes of neuropsychological testing, and a high proportion of HIV-infected patients with effective cART may be classified as neurocognitively abnormal using the current criteria. The definition of ANI is not stringent, and results in approximately 20% of the population being classified as abnormal. To us this seems an unacceptable false-positive rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3260107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32601072012-01-18 The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence? Gisslén, Magnus Price, Richard W Nilsson, Staffan BMC Infect Dis Debate BACKGROUND: A substantial prevalence of mild neurocognitive disorders has been reported in HIV, also in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This includes a new disorder that has been termed asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI). DISCUSSION: ANI is identified by performance on formal neuropsychological testing that is at least 1 SD below the mean of normative scores in at least two cognitive domains out of at least five examined in patients without associated symptoms or evident functional impairment in daily living. While two tests are recommended to assess each domain, only one is required to fulfill this diagnostic criterion. Unfortunately, this definition necessitates that about 20% of the cognitively normal HIV-infected population is classified as suffering ANI. This liberal definition raises important ethical concerns and has as well diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Since neither its biological substrate, prognostic significance nor therapeutic implications are clearly established, we recommend that this diagnosis be modified or applied cautiously. SUMMARY: The diagnoses of less severe forms of neurocognitive disorders in HIV relies on the outcomes of neuropsychological testing, and a high proportion of HIV-infected patients with effective cART may be classified as neurocognitively abnormal using the current criteria. The definition of ANI is not stringent, and results in approximately 20% of the population being classified as abnormal. To us this seems an unacceptable false-positive rate. BioMed Central 2011-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3260107/ /pubmed/22204557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-356 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gisslén et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Gisslén, Magnus
Price, Richard W
Nilsson, Staffan
The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
title The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
title_full The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
title_fullStr The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
title_full_unstemmed The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
title_short The definition of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
title_sort definition of hiv-associated neurocognitive disorders: are we overestimating the real prevalence?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-356
work_keys_str_mv AT gisslenmagnus thedefinitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence
AT pricerichardw thedefinitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence
AT nilssonstaffan thedefinitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence
AT gisslenmagnus definitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence
AT pricerichardw definitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence
AT nilssonstaffan definitionofhivassociatedneurocognitivedisordersareweoverestimatingtherealprevalence