Cargando…

The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality

For the most part solutions to farm animal welfare issues, such as piglet mortality, are likely to lie within the scientific disciplines of environmental design and genetic selection, however understanding the ecological basis of some of the complex dynamics observed between parent and offspring cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baxter, Emma M., Jarvis, Susan, Palarea-Albaladejo, Javier, Edwards, Sandra A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22272334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030318
_version_ 1782221471752388608
author Baxter, Emma M.
Jarvis, Susan
Palarea-Albaladejo, Javier
Edwards, Sandra A.
author_facet Baxter, Emma M.
Jarvis, Susan
Palarea-Albaladejo, Javier
Edwards, Sandra A.
author_sort Baxter, Emma M.
collection PubMed
description For the most part solutions to farm animal welfare issues, such as piglet mortality, are likely to lie within the scientific disciplines of environmental design and genetic selection, however understanding the ecological basis of some of the complex dynamics observed between parent and offspring could make a valuable contribution. One interesting, and often discussed, aspect of mortality is the propensity for it to be sex-biased. This study investigated whether known physiological and behavioural indicators of piglet survival differed between the sexes and whether life history strategies (often reported in wild or feral populations) relating to parental investment were being displayed in a domestic population of pigs. Sex ratio (proportion of males (males/males+females)) at birth was 0.54 and sex allocation (maternal investment measured as piglet birth weight/litter weight) was statistically significantly male-biased at 0.55 (t(35) = 2.51 P = 0.017), suggesting that sows invested more in sons than daughters during gestation. Despite this investment in birth weight, a known survival indicator, total pre-weaning male mortality was statistically significantly higher than female mortality (12% vs. 7% respectively z = 2.06 P = 0.040). Males tended to suffer from crushing by the sow more than females and statistically significantly more males died from disease-related causes. Although males were born on average heavier, with higher body mass index and ponderal index, these differences were not sustained. In addition male piglets showed impaired thermoregulation compared to females. These results suggest male-biased mortality exists despite greater initial maternal investment, and therefore reflects the greater susceptibility of this sex to causal mortality factors. Life history strategies are being displayed by a domestic population of pigs with sows in this study displaying a form of parental optimism by allocating greater resources at birth to males and providing an over-supply of this more vulnerable sex in expectation of sex-biased mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3260262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32602622012-01-23 The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality Baxter, Emma M. Jarvis, Susan Palarea-Albaladejo, Javier Edwards, Sandra A. PLoS One Research Article For the most part solutions to farm animal welfare issues, such as piglet mortality, are likely to lie within the scientific disciplines of environmental design and genetic selection, however understanding the ecological basis of some of the complex dynamics observed between parent and offspring could make a valuable contribution. One interesting, and often discussed, aspect of mortality is the propensity for it to be sex-biased. This study investigated whether known physiological and behavioural indicators of piglet survival differed between the sexes and whether life history strategies (often reported in wild or feral populations) relating to parental investment were being displayed in a domestic population of pigs. Sex ratio (proportion of males (males/males+females)) at birth was 0.54 and sex allocation (maternal investment measured as piglet birth weight/litter weight) was statistically significantly male-biased at 0.55 (t(35) = 2.51 P = 0.017), suggesting that sows invested more in sons than daughters during gestation. Despite this investment in birth weight, a known survival indicator, total pre-weaning male mortality was statistically significantly higher than female mortality (12% vs. 7% respectively z = 2.06 P = 0.040). Males tended to suffer from crushing by the sow more than females and statistically significantly more males died from disease-related causes. Although males were born on average heavier, with higher body mass index and ponderal index, these differences were not sustained. In addition male piglets showed impaired thermoregulation compared to females. These results suggest male-biased mortality exists despite greater initial maternal investment, and therefore reflects the greater susceptibility of this sex to causal mortality factors. Life history strategies are being displayed by a domestic population of pigs with sows in this study displaying a form of parental optimism by allocating greater resources at birth to males and providing an over-supply of this more vulnerable sex in expectation of sex-biased mortality. Public Library of Science 2012-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3260262/ /pubmed/22272334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030318 Text en Baxter et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baxter, Emma M.
Jarvis, Susan
Palarea-Albaladejo, Javier
Edwards, Sandra A.
The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality
title The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality
title_full The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality
title_fullStr The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality
title_full_unstemmed The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality
title_short The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-Biased Piglet Mortality
title_sort weaker sex? the propensity for male-biased piglet mortality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3260262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22272334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030318
work_keys_str_mv AT baxteremmam theweakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT jarvissusan theweakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT palareaalbaladejojavier theweakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT edwardssandraa theweakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT baxteremmam weakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT jarvissusan weakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT palareaalbaladejojavier weakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality
AT edwardssandraa weakersexthepropensityformalebiasedpigletmortality