Cargando…

PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain

BACKGROUND: We compared six kinetic models with and without the requirement of arterial cannulation for estimating the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in the living human brain. METHODS: Distribution volumes of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in brain regions were estimated using single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munk, Ole L, Smith, Donald F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-36
_version_ 1782221549070188544
author Munk, Ole L
Smith, Donald F
author_facet Munk, Ole L
Smith, Donald F
author_sort Munk, Ole L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We compared six kinetic models with and without the requirement of arterial cannulation for estimating the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in the living human brain. METHODS: Distribution volumes of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in brain regions were estimated using single- and two-tissue compartment models as well as a graphical plasma input model. The two-tissue compartment model provided a direct estimate of the binding potentials of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in brain regions, while binding potentials of the single-tissue compartment model and the graphical plasma input model were estimated indirectly from ratios of distribution volumes in brain regions. We obtained also direct estimates of binding potentials using a graphical reference tissue model and two nonlinear reference tissue models. RESULTS: The two-tissue compartment model required several fits with different initial guesses for avoiding negative values of parameters. Despite the extra fits, estimates of distribution volumes and binding potentials of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine obtained by the two-tissue compartment model were far more variable than those produced by the other methods. The graphical plasma input method and the graphical reference tissue method provided estimates of the binding potential that correlated closely, but differed in magnitude. The single-tissue compartment model provided relatively low estimates of binding potentials with curves that failed to fit the data as well as the three other methods that used the entire series of positron emission tomography data. The reference tissue method and the simplified reference tissue method provided similar, consistent estimates of binding potentials. However, certain assumptions of the simplified reference tissue method may not be fulfilled by the radioligand. CONCLUSION: The reference tissue method is appropriate for estimating the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in regions of the human brain so that the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine can be estimated without arterial cannulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3261093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32610932012-02-03 PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain Munk, Ole L Smith, Donald F EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: We compared six kinetic models with and without the requirement of arterial cannulation for estimating the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in the living human brain. METHODS: Distribution volumes of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in brain regions were estimated using single- and two-tissue compartment models as well as a graphical plasma input model. The two-tissue compartment model provided a direct estimate of the binding potentials of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in brain regions, while binding potentials of the single-tissue compartment model and the graphical plasma input model were estimated indirectly from ratios of distribution volumes in brain regions. We obtained also direct estimates of binding potentials using a graphical reference tissue model and two nonlinear reference tissue models. RESULTS: The two-tissue compartment model required several fits with different initial guesses for avoiding negative values of parameters. Despite the extra fits, estimates of distribution volumes and binding potentials of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine obtained by the two-tissue compartment model were far more variable than those produced by the other methods. The graphical plasma input method and the graphical reference tissue method provided estimates of the binding potential that correlated closely, but differed in magnitude. The single-tissue compartment model provided relatively low estimates of binding potentials with curves that failed to fit the data as well as the three other methods that used the entire series of positron emission tomography data. The reference tissue method and the simplified reference tissue method provided similar, consistent estimates of binding potentials. However, certain assumptions of the simplified reference tissue method may not be fulfilled by the radioligand. CONCLUSION: The reference tissue method is appropriate for estimating the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine in regions of the human brain so that the binding potential of [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine can be estimated without arterial cannulation. Springer 2011-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3261093/ /pubmed/22214419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-36 Text en Copyright © 2011 Munk and Smith; licensee Springer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Munk, Ole L
Smith, Donald F
PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain
title PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain
title_full PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain
title_fullStr PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain
title_full_unstemmed PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain
title_short PET kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [N-methyl-(11)C]mirtazapine, in the human brain
title_sort pet kinetics of radiolabeled antidepressant, [n-methyl-(11)c]mirtazapine, in the human brain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-36
work_keys_str_mv AT munkolel petkineticsofradiolabeledantidepressantnmethyl11cmirtazapineinthehumanbrain
AT smithdonaldf petkineticsofradiolabeledantidepressantnmethyl11cmirtazapineinthehumanbrain