Cargando…

Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?

We used high‐resolution fMRI to investigate claims that learning to read results in greater left occipito‐temporal (OT) activation for written words relative to pictures of objects. In the first experiment, 9/16 subjects performing a one‐back task showed activation in ≥1 left OT voxel for words rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Nicholas D., Mechelli, Andrea, Noppeney, Uta, Veltman, Dick J., Rombouts, Serge A.R.B., Glensman, Janice, Haynes, John‐Dylan, Price, Cathy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20443
_version_ 1782221584310730752
author Wright, Nicholas D.
Mechelli, Andrea
Noppeney, Uta
Veltman, Dick J.
Rombouts, Serge A.R.B.
Glensman, Janice
Haynes, John‐Dylan
Price, Cathy J.
author_facet Wright, Nicholas D.
Mechelli, Andrea
Noppeney, Uta
Veltman, Dick J.
Rombouts, Serge A.R.B.
Glensman, Janice
Haynes, John‐Dylan
Price, Cathy J.
author_sort Wright, Nicholas D.
collection PubMed
description We used high‐resolution fMRI to investigate claims that learning to read results in greater left occipito‐temporal (OT) activation for written words relative to pictures of objects. In the first experiment, 9/16 subjects performing a one‐back task showed activation in ≥1 left OT voxel for words relative to pictures (P < 0.05 uncorrected). In a second experiment, another 9/15 subjects performing a semantic decision task activated ≥1 left OT voxel for words relative to pictures. However, at this low statistical threshold false positives need to be excluded. The semantic decision paradigm was therefore repeated, within subject, in two different scanners (1.5 and 3 T). Both scanners consistently localised left OT activation for words relative to fixation and pictures relative to words, but there were no consistent effects for words relative to pictures. Finally, in a third experiment, we minimised the voxel size (1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm(3)) and demonstrated a striking concordance between the voxels activated for words and pictures, irrespective of task (naming vs. one‐back) or script (English vs. Hebrew). In summary, although we detected differential activation for words relative to pictures, these effects: (i) do not withstand statistical rigour; (ii) do not replicate within or between subjects; and (iii) are observed in voxels that also respond to pictures of objects. Our findings have implications for the role of left OT activation during reading. More generally, they show that studies using low statistical thresholds in single subject analyses should correct the statistical threshold for the number of comparisons made or replicate effects within subject. Hum Brain Mapp 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3261380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32613802012-01-20 Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives? Wright, Nicholas D. Mechelli, Andrea Noppeney, Uta Veltman, Dick J. Rombouts, Serge A.R.B. Glensman, Janice Haynes, John‐Dylan Price, Cathy J. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles We used high‐resolution fMRI to investigate claims that learning to read results in greater left occipito‐temporal (OT) activation for written words relative to pictures of objects. In the first experiment, 9/16 subjects performing a one‐back task showed activation in ≥1 left OT voxel for words relative to pictures (P < 0.05 uncorrected). In a second experiment, another 9/15 subjects performing a semantic decision task activated ≥1 left OT voxel for words relative to pictures. However, at this low statistical threshold false positives need to be excluded. The semantic decision paradigm was therefore repeated, within subject, in two different scanners (1.5 and 3 T). Both scanners consistently localised left OT activation for words relative to fixation and pictures relative to words, but there were no consistent effects for words relative to pictures. Finally, in a third experiment, we minimised the voxel size (1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm(3)) and demonstrated a striking concordance between the voxels activated for words and pictures, irrespective of task (naming vs. one‐back) or script (English vs. Hebrew). In summary, although we detected differential activation for words relative to pictures, these effects: (i) do not withstand statistical rigour; (ii) do not replicate within or between subjects; and (iii) are observed in voxels that also respond to pictures of objects. Our findings have implications for the role of left OT activation during reading. More generally, they show that studies using low statistical thresholds in single subject analyses should correct the statistical threshold for the number of comparisons made or replicate effects within subject. Hum Brain Mapp 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2007-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3261380/ /pubmed/17712786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20443 Text en Copyright © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Open access.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wright, Nicholas D.
Mechelli, Andrea
Noppeney, Uta
Veltman, Dick J.
Rombouts, Serge A.R.B.
Glensman, Janice
Haynes, John‐Dylan
Price, Cathy J.
Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?
title Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?
title_full Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?
title_fullStr Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?
title_full_unstemmed Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?
title_short Selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: Individual variability or false positives?
title_sort selective activation around the left occipito‐temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: individual variability or false positives?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20443
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightnicholasd selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT mechelliandrea selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT noppeneyuta selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT veltmandickj selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT romboutssergearb selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT glensmanjanice selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT haynesjohndylan selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives
AT pricecathyj selectiveactivationaroundtheleftoccipitotemporalsulcusforwordsrelativetopicturesindividualvariabilityorfalsepositives