Cargando…

What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners

Background. Despite the availability of multiple effective tests for colorectal cancer (CRC), screening rates are low. Greater understanding of barriers between screeners and nonscreeners may improve public health initiatives to increase CRC screening (CRCS). Methods. We conducted a content analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina, Gilda G., McQueen, Amy, Greisinger, Anthony J., Bartholomew, L. Kay, Vernon, Sally W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22272194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/895807
_version_ 1782221596706996224
author Medina, Gilda G.
McQueen, Amy
Greisinger, Anthony J.
Bartholomew, L. Kay
Vernon, Sally W.
author_facet Medina, Gilda G.
McQueen, Amy
Greisinger, Anthony J.
Bartholomew, L. Kay
Vernon, Sally W.
author_sort Medina, Gilda G.
collection PubMed
description Background. Despite the availability of multiple effective tests for colorectal cancer (CRC), screening rates are low. Greater understanding of barriers between screeners and nonscreeners may improve public health initiatives to increase CRC screening (CRCS). Methods. We conducted a content analysis of 625 responses to the question: “Was there anything that would have made getting tested easier?” Respondents were patients at a multispecialty practice who participated in a behavioral intervention trial to increase CRCS. Using clinic records, we classified patients as early-screeners (<6 months), late-screeners(6–12 months), and nonscreeners (>12 months). Results. Both screeners and nonscreeners reported the same categories of barriers. However, early-screeners predominantly cited dislike of test attributes such as bowel preparation, whereas nonscreeners cited concerns regarding finances and work and family responsibilities. Conclusion. Multilevel strategies that address scheduling barriers and external screening barriers may improve CRCS. Future studies may test hypotheses about mediators explaining how screeners overcome barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3261462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32614622012-01-23 What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners Medina, Gilda G. McQueen, Amy Greisinger, Anthony J. Bartholomew, L. Kay Vernon, Sally W. Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Background. Despite the availability of multiple effective tests for colorectal cancer (CRC), screening rates are low. Greater understanding of barriers between screeners and nonscreeners may improve public health initiatives to increase CRC screening (CRCS). Methods. We conducted a content analysis of 625 responses to the question: “Was there anything that would have made getting tested easier?” Respondents were patients at a multispecialty practice who participated in a behavioral intervention trial to increase CRCS. Using clinic records, we classified patients as early-screeners (<6 months), late-screeners(6–12 months), and nonscreeners (>12 months). Results. Both screeners and nonscreeners reported the same categories of barriers. However, early-screeners predominantly cited dislike of test attributes such as bowel preparation, whereas nonscreeners cited concerns regarding finances and work and family responsibilities. Conclusion. Multilevel strategies that address scheduling barriers and external screening barriers may improve CRCS. Future studies may test hypotheses about mediators explaining how screeners overcome barriers. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3261462/ /pubmed/22272194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/895807 Text en Copyright © 2012 Gilda G. Medina et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Medina, Gilda G.
McQueen, Amy
Greisinger, Anthony J.
Bartholomew, L. Kay
Vernon, Sally W.
What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners
title What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners
title_full What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners
title_fullStr What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners
title_full_unstemmed What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners
title_short What Would Make Getting Colorectal Cancer Screening Easier? Perspectives from Screeners and Nonscreeners
title_sort what would make getting colorectal cancer screening easier? perspectives from screeners and nonscreeners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22272194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/895807
work_keys_str_mv AT medinagildag whatwouldmakegettingcolorectalcancerscreeningeasierperspectivesfromscreenersandnonscreeners
AT mcqueenamy whatwouldmakegettingcolorectalcancerscreeningeasierperspectivesfromscreenersandnonscreeners
AT greisingeranthonyj whatwouldmakegettingcolorectalcancerscreeningeasierperspectivesfromscreenersandnonscreeners
AT bartholomewlkay whatwouldmakegettingcolorectalcancerscreeningeasierperspectivesfromscreenersandnonscreeners
AT vernonsallyw whatwouldmakegettingcolorectalcancerscreeningeasierperspectivesfromscreenersandnonscreeners