Cargando…

Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme

BACKGROUND: The ability to perform de novo biosynthesis of purines is present in organisms in all three domains of life, reflecting the essentiality of these molecules to life. Although the pathway is quite similar in eukaryotes and bacteria, the archaeal pathway is more variable. A careful manual c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Anne M, Hoopes, Samantha L, White, Robert H, Sarisky, Catherine A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22168471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-63
_version_ 1782221634544861184
author Brown, Anne M
Hoopes, Samantha L
White, Robert H
Sarisky, Catherine A
author_facet Brown, Anne M
Hoopes, Samantha L
White, Robert H
Sarisky, Catherine A
author_sort Brown, Anne M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to perform de novo biosynthesis of purines is present in organisms in all three domains of life, reflecting the essentiality of these molecules to life. Although the pathway is quite similar in eukaryotes and bacteria, the archaeal pathway is more variable. A careful manual curation of genes in this pathway demonstrates the value of manual curation in archaea, even in pathways that have been well-studied in other domains. RESULTS: We searched the Integrated Microbial Genome system (IMG) for the 17 distinct genes involved in the 11 steps of de novo purine biosynthesis in 65 sequenced archaea, finding 738 predicted proteins with sequence similarity to known purine biosynthesis enzymes. Each sequence was manually inspected for the presence of active site residues and other residues known or suspected to be required for function. Many apparently purine-biosynthesizing archaea lack evidence for a single enzyme, either glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase or inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase, suggesting that there are at least two more gene variants in the purine biosynthetic pathway to discover. Variations in domain arrangement of formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthetase and substantial problems in aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase and inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase assignments were also identified. Manual curation revealed some overly specific annotations in the IMG gene product name, with predicted proteins without essential active site residues assigned product names implying enzymatic activity (21 proteins, 2.8% of proteins inspected) or Enzyme Commission (E. C.) numbers (57 proteins, 7.7%). There were also 57 proteins (7.7%) assigned overly generic names and 78 proteins (10.6%) without E.C. numbers as part of the assigned name when a specific enzyme name and E. C. number were well-justified. CONCLUSIONS: The patchy distribution of purine biosynthetic genes in archaea is consistent with a pathway that has been shaped by horizontal gene transfer, duplication, and gene loss. Our results indicate that manual curation can improve upon automated annotation for a small number of automatically-annotated proteins and can reveal a need to identify further pathway components even in well-studied pathways. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Céline Brochier-Armanet, Dr Kira S Makarova (nominated by Dr. Eugene Koonin), and Dr. Michael Galperin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3261824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32618242012-01-20 Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme Brown, Anne M Hoopes, Samantha L White, Robert H Sarisky, Catherine A Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: The ability to perform de novo biosynthesis of purines is present in organisms in all three domains of life, reflecting the essentiality of these molecules to life. Although the pathway is quite similar in eukaryotes and bacteria, the archaeal pathway is more variable. A careful manual curation of genes in this pathway demonstrates the value of manual curation in archaea, even in pathways that have been well-studied in other domains. RESULTS: We searched the Integrated Microbial Genome system (IMG) for the 17 distinct genes involved in the 11 steps of de novo purine biosynthesis in 65 sequenced archaea, finding 738 predicted proteins with sequence similarity to known purine biosynthesis enzymes. Each sequence was manually inspected for the presence of active site residues and other residues known or suspected to be required for function. Many apparently purine-biosynthesizing archaea lack evidence for a single enzyme, either glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase or inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase, suggesting that there are at least two more gene variants in the purine biosynthetic pathway to discover. Variations in domain arrangement of formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthetase and substantial problems in aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase and inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase assignments were also identified. Manual curation revealed some overly specific annotations in the IMG gene product name, with predicted proteins without essential active site residues assigned product names implying enzymatic activity (21 proteins, 2.8% of proteins inspected) or Enzyme Commission (E. C.) numbers (57 proteins, 7.7%). There were also 57 proteins (7.7%) assigned overly generic names and 78 proteins (10.6%) without E.C. numbers as part of the assigned name when a specific enzyme name and E. C. number were well-justified. CONCLUSIONS: The patchy distribution of purine biosynthetic genes in archaea is consistent with a pathway that has been shaped by horizontal gene transfer, duplication, and gene loss. Our results indicate that manual curation can improve upon automated annotation for a small number of automatically-annotated proteins and can reveal a need to identify further pathway components even in well-studied pathways. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Céline Brochier-Armanet, Dr Kira S Makarova (nominated by Dr. Eugene Koonin), and Dr. Michael Galperin. BioMed Central 2011-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3261824/ /pubmed/22168471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-63 Text en Copyright ©2011 Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Brown, Anne M
Hoopes, Samantha L
White, Robert H
Sarisky, Catherine A
Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
title Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
title_full Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
title_fullStr Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
title_full_unstemmed Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
title_short Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
title_sort purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3261824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22168471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-63
work_keys_str_mv AT brownannem purinebiosynthesisinarchaeavariationsonatheme
AT hoopessamanthal purinebiosynthesisinarchaeavariationsonatheme
AT whiteroberth purinebiosynthesisinarchaeavariationsonatheme
AT sariskycatherinea purinebiosynthesisinarchaeavariationsonatheme