Cargando…

A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas

OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are the two most commonly used cytokines for mobilization of stem cells in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Both cytokines increase the peripheral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosing, Chitra, Munsell, Mark F, Reuben, James M, Popat, Uday, Lee, Bang-Ning, Gao, Hui, Körbling, Martin, Shpall, Elizabeth J, Kebriaei, Partow, Alousi, Amin, De Lima, Marcos, McMannis, John, Qazilbash, Muzaffar, Anderlini, Paolo, Giralt, Sergio, Champlin, Richard E, Khouri, Issa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282683
_version_ 1782221706569449472
author Hosing, Chitra
Munsell, Mark F
Reuben, James M
Popat, Uday
Lee, Bang-Ning
Gao, Hui
Körbling, Martin
Shpall, Elizabeth J
Kebriaei, Partow
Alousi, Amin
De Lima, Marcos
McMannis, John
Qazilbash, Muzaffar
Anderlini, Paolo
Giralt, Sergio
Champlin, Richard E
Khouri, Issa
author_facet Hosing, Chitra
Munsell, Mark F
Reuben, James M
Popat, Uday
Lee, Bang-Ning
Gao, Hui
Körbling, Martin
Shpall, Elizabeth J
Kebriaei, Partow
Alousi, Amin
De Lima, Marcos
McMannis, John
Qazilbash, Muzaffar
Anderlini, Paolo
Giralt, Sergio
Champlin, Richard E
Khouri, Issa
author_sort Hosing, Chitra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are the two most commonly used cytokines for mobilization of stem cells in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Both cytokines increase the peripheral blood white blood cell count and the stem cell count but there are other differences in the stem cell products mobilized by G-CSF versus those mobilized with GM-CSF. Generally higher numbers of dendritic cells are mobilized with GM-CSF than by G-CSF. The primary objective of this randomized study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who were undergoing chemo-mobilization. Secondary objectives were to determine the expression of various dendritic cell subsets in the two groups and to determine the incidence of disease progression or relapse at 12 months. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 84 patients with relapsed NHL who were candidates for high dose therapy (HDT). All patients underwent chemo-mobilization using ifosfamide, etoposide, and rituximab. All patients were randomized in an adaptive manner to receive either G-CSF or G-CSF plus GM-CSF (G+GM) starting 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy and continuing until completion of apheresis. The stem cell yield/kg, the number of apheresis procedures needed in the two groups, and the toxicity were recorded. We also enumerated dendritic cell subsets, myeloid DCs (mDC) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDC), in apheresis products and in peripheral blood (PB) samples collected pre-chemotherapy. The data were expressed as a percentage of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were treated. Forty-three patients received G-CSF and 41 received G+GM. Both regimens were well tolerated. The median CD34+ cell dose collected was similar in the two groups. A total of 54 (G-CSF N = 25 and G+GM N = 29) paired samples from baseline and post-apheresis were available for analysis of dendritic cell subsets. There was no significant difference in the percentages of mDC subsets between baseline and post-apheresis collected with G-CSF or G+GM mobilization. However, there was a significant increase in the percentage of pDC subsets in the G-CSF alone when compared to the G+GM arm (P = 0.002). Furthermore, the ratio of mDC and pDC was significantly lower after mobilization with G-CSF versus G+GM (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF to the mobilization regimen resulted in lower percentages of pDC in the apheresis products when compared to those with G-CSF alone. This shifts the mDC/pDC ratio in the apheresis grafts in favor of mDC in the combination arm. However, these differences did not seem to impact the clinical outcomes in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00499343).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3262333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32623332012-01-26 A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas Hosing, Chitra Munsell, Mark F Reuben, James M Popat, Uday Lee, Bang-Ning Gao, Hui Körbling, Martin Shpall, Elizabeth J Kebriaei, Partow Alousi, Amin De Lima, Marcos McMannis, John Qazilbash, Muzaffar Anderlini, Paolo Giralt, Sergio Champlin, Richard E Khouri, Issa J Blood Med Original Research OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are the two most commonly used cytokines for mobilization of stem cells in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Both cytokines increase the peripheral blood white blood cell count and the stem cell count but there are other differences in the stem cell products mobilized by G-CSF versus those mobilized with GM-CSF. Generally higher numbers of dendritic cells are mobilized with GM-CSF than by G-CSF. The primary objective of this randomized study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who were undergoing chemo-mobilization. Secondary objectives were to determine the expression of various dendritic cell subsets in the two groups and to determine the incidence of disease progression or relapse at 12 months. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 84 patients with relapsed NHL who were candidates for high dose therapy (HDT). All patients underwent chemo-mobilization using ifosfamide, etoposide, and rituximab. All patients were randomized in an adaptive manner to receive either G-CSF or G-CSF plus GM-CSF (G+GM) starting 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy and continuing until completion of apheresis. The stem cell yield/kg, the number of apheresis procedures needed in the two groups, and the toxicity were recorded. We also enumerated dendritic cell subsets, myeloid DCs (mDC) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDC), in apheresis products and in peripheral blood (PB) samples collected pre-chemotherapy. The data were expressed as a percentage of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were treated. Forty-three patients received G-CSF and 41 received G+GM. Both regimens were well tolerated. The median CD34+ cell dose collected was similar in the two groups. A total of 54 (G-CSF N = 25 and G+GM N = 29) paired samples from baseline and post-apheresis were available for analysis of dendritic cell subsets. There was no significant difference in the percentages of mDC subsets between baseline and post-apheresis collected with G-CSF or G+GM mobilization. However, there was a significant increase in the percentage of pDC subsets in the G-CSF alone when compared to the G+GM arm (P = 0.002). Furthermore, the ratio of mDC and pDC was significantly lower after mobilization with G-CSF versus G+GM (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF to the mobilization regimen resulted in lower percentages of pDC in the apheresis products when compared to those with G-CSF alone. This shifts the mDC/pDC ratio in the apheresis grafts in favor of mDC in the combination arm. However, these differences did not seem to impact the clinical outcomes in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00499343). Dove Medical Press 2010-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3262333/ /pubmed/22282683 Text en © 2010 Hosing et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hosing, Chitra
Munsell, Mark F
Reuben, James M
Popat, Uday
Lee, Bang-Ning
Gao, Hui
Körbling, Martin
Shpall, Elizabeth J
Kebriaei, Partow
Alousi, Amin
De Lima, Marcos
McMannis, John
Qazilbash, Muzaffar
Anderlini, Paolo
Giralt, Sergio
Champlin, Richard E
Khouri, Issa
A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
title A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
title_full A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
title_fullStr A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
title_full_unstemmed A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
title_short A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
title_sort randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by g-csf alone or in combination with gm-csf for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphomas
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282683
work_keys_str_mv AT hosingchitra arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT munsellmarkf arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT reubenjamesm arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT popatuday arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT leebangning arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT gaohui arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT korblingmartin arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT shpallelizabethj arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT kebriaeipartow arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT alousiamin arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT delimamarcos arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT mcmannisjohn arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT qazilbashmuzaffar arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT anderlinipaolo arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT giraltsergio arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT champlinricharde arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT khouriissa arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT hosingchitra randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT munsellmarkf randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT reubenjamesm randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT popatuday randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT leebangning randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT gaohui randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT korblingmartin randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT shpallelizabethj randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT kebriaeipartow randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT alousiamin randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT delimamarcos randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT mcmannisjohn randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT qazilbashmuzaffar randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT anderlinipaolo randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT giraltsergio randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT champlinricharde randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas
AT khouriissa randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas