Cargando…
A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas
OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are the two most commonly used cytokines for mobilization of stem cells in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Both cytokines increase the peripheral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282683 |
_version_ | 1782221706569449472 |
---|---|
author | Hosing, Chitra Munsell, Mark F Reuben, James M Popat, Uday Lee, Bang-Ning Gao, Hui Körbling, Martin Shpall, Elizabeth J Kebriaei, Partow Alousi, Amin De Lima, Marcos McMannis, John Qazilbash, Muzaffar Anderlini, Paolo Giralt, Sergio Champlin, Richard E Khouri, Issa |
author_facet | Hosing, Chitra Munsell, Mark F Reuben, James M Popat, Uday Lee, Bang-Ning Gao, Hui Körbling, Martin Shpall, Elizabeth J Kebriaei, Partow Alousi, Amin De Lima, Marcos McMannis, John Qazilbash, Muzaffar Anderlini, Paolo Giralt, Sergio Champlin, Richard E Khouri, Issa |
author_sort | Hosing, Chitra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are the two most commonly used cytokines for mobilization of stem cells in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Both cytokines increase the peripheral blood white blood cell count and the stem cell count but there are other differences in the stem cell products mobilized by G-CSF versus those mobilized with GM-CSF. Generally higher numbers of dendritic cells are mobilized with GM-CSF than by G-CSF. The primary objective of this randomized study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who were undergoing chemo-mobilization. Secondary objectives were to determine the expression of various dendritic cell subsets in the two groups and to determine the incidence of disease progression or relapse at 12 months. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 84 patients with relapsed NHL who were candidates for high dose therapy (HDT). All patients underwent chemo-mobilization using ifosfamide, etoposide, and rituximab. All patients were randomized in an adaptive manner to receive either G-CSF or G-CSF plus GM-CSF (G+GM) starting 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy and continuing until completion of apheresis. The stem cell yield/kg, the number of apheresis procedures needed in the two groups, and the toxicity were recorded. We also enumerated dendritic cell subsets, myeloid DCs (mDC) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDC), in apheresis products and in peripheral blood (PB) samples collected pre-chemotherapy. The data were expressed as a percentage of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were treated. Forty-three patients received G-CSF and 41 received G+GM. Both regimens were well tolerated. The median CD34+ cell dose collected was similar in the two groups. A total of 54 (G-CSF N = 25 and G+GM N = 29) paired samples from baseline and post-apheresis were available for analysis of dendritic cell subsets. There was no significant difference in the percentages of mDC subsets between baseline and post-apheresis collected with G-CSF or G+GM mobilization. However, there was a significant increase in the percentage of pDC subsets in the G-CSF alone when compared to the G+GM arm (P = 0.002). Furthermore, the ratio of mDC and pDC was significantly lower after mobilization with G-CSF versus G+GM (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF to the mobilization regimen resulted in lower percentages of pDC in the apheresis products when compared to those with G-CSF alone. This shifts the mDC/pDC ratio in the apheresis grafts in favor of mDC in the combination arm. However, these differences did not seem to impact the clinical outcomes in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00499343). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3262333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32623332012-01-26 A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas Hosing, Chitra Munsell, Mark F Reuben, James M Popat, Uday Lee, Bang-Ning Gao, Hui Körbling, Martin Shpall, Elizabeth J Kebriaei, Partow Alousi, Amin De Lima, Marcos McMannis, John Qazilbash, Muzaffar Anderlini, Paolo Giralt, Sergio Champlin, Richard E Khouri, Issa J Blood Med Original Research OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are the two most commonly used cytokines for mobilization of stem cells in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Both cytokines increase the peripheral blood white blood cell count and the stem cell count but there are other differences in the stem cell products mobilized by G-CSF versus those mobilized with GM-CSF. Generally higher numbers of dendritic cells are mobilized with GM-CSF than by G-CSF. The primary objective of this randomized study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus chemotherapy plus G-CSF and GM-CSF in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who were undergoing chemo-mobilization. Secondary objectives were to determine the expression of various dendritic cell subsets in the two groups and to determine the incidence of disease progression or relapse at 12 months. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 84 patients with relapsed NHL who were candidates for high dose therapy (HDT). All patients underwent chemo-mobilization using ifosfamide, etoposide, and rituximab. All patients were randomized in an adaptive manner to receive either G-CSF or G-CSF plus GM-CSF (G+GM) starting 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy and continuing until completion of apheresis. The stem cell yield/kg, the number of apheresis procedures needed in the two groups, and the toxicity were recorded. We also enumerated dendritic cell subsets, myeloid DCs (mDC) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDC), in apheresis products and in peripheral blood (PB) samples collected pre-chemotherapy. The data were expressed as a percentage of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were treated. Forty-three patients received G-CSF and 41 received G+GM. Both regimens were well tolerated. The median CD34+ cell dose collected was similar in the two groups. A total of 54 (G-CSF N = 25 and G+GM N = 29) paired samples from baseline and post-apheresis were available for analysis of dendritic cell subsets. There was no significant difference in the percentages of mDC subsets between baseline and post-apheresis collected with G-CSF or G+GM mobilization. However, there was a significant increase in the percentage of pDC subsets in the G-CSF alone when compared to the G+GM arm (P = 0.002). Furthermore, the ratio of mDC and pDC was significantly lower after mobilization with G-CSF versus G+GM (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF to the mobilization regimen resulted in lower percentages of pDC in the apheresis products when compared to those with G-CSF alone. This shifts the mDC/pDC ratio in the apheresis grafts in favor of mDC in the combination arm. However, these differences did not seem to impact the clinical outcomes in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00499343). Dove Medical Press 2010-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3262333/ /pubmed/22282683 Text en © 2010 Hosing et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hosing, Chitra Munsell, Mark F Reuben, James M Popat, Uday Lee, Bang-Ning Gao, Hui Körbling, Martin Shpall, Elizabeth J Kebriaei, Partow Alousi, Amin De Lima, Marcos McMannis, John Qazilbash, Muzaffar Anderlini, Paolo Giralt, Sergio Champlin, Richard E Khouri, Issa A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas |
title | A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas |
title_full | A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas |
title_fullStr | A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas |
title_short | A randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone or in combination with GM-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas |
title_sort | randomized study comparing chemotherapy followed by g-csf alone or in combination with gm-csf for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphomas |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosingchitra arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT munsellmarkf arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT reubenjamesm arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT popatuday arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT leebangning arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT gaohui arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT korblingmartin arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT shpallelizabethj arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT kebriaeipartow arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT alousiamin arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT delimamarcos arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT mcmannisjohn arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT qazilbashmuzaffar arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT anderlinipaolo arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT giraltsergio arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT champlinricharde arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT khouriissa arandomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT hosingchitra randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT munsellmarkf randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT reubenjamesm randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT popatuday randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT leebangning randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT gaohui randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT korblingmartin randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT shpallelizabethj randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT kebriaeipartow randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT alousiamin randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT delimamarcos randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT mcmannisjohn randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT qazilbashmuzaffar randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT anderlinipaolo randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT giraltsergio randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT champlinricharde randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas AT khouriissa randomizedstudycomparingchemotherapyfollowedbygcsfaloneorincombinationwithgmcsfformobilizationofperipheralbloodstemcellsinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomas |