Cargando…

Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?

Autologous stem cell transplantation is the preferred treatment option for younger patients with symptomatic plasma cell myeloma. Most patients with newly diagnosed plasma cell myeloma receive 3–4 cycles of induction chemotherapy to achieve a level of disease control before proceeding to stem cell t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fung, Henry C, Nathan, Sunita, Maciejewski, John J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291488
_version_ 1782221716835008512
author Fung, Henry C
Nathan, Sunita
Maciejewski, John J
author_facet Fung, Henry C
Nathan, Sunita
Maciejewski, John J
author_sort Fung, Henry C
collection PubMed
description Autologous stem cell transplantation is the preferred treatment option for younger patients with symptomatic plasma cell myeloma. Most patients with newly diagnosed plasma cell myeloma receive 3–4 cycles of induction chemotherapy to achieve a level of disease control before proceeding to stem cell transplant. The ideal induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients shall allow more patients to proceed with transplant, rapidly and effectively control the disease, reverse disease-related complications, avoid early death, and is associated with minimal acute and long-term toxicities. Because of the concerns of potential damages to hematopoietic stem cells, alkylating agent regimens, specifically melphalan, are usually avoided for induction in transplant-eligible patients. Before the advance of immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitors, the combination of vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) and variants were the most commonly used induction regimens. Recent reports as discussed in this review suggests that VAD is no longer the induction chemotherapy of choice for transplant eligible patients. Newer regimens incorporating IMiD and/or proteasome inhibitor into the induction regimen improve response rates and progression-free survival before and after the transplant and are evolving as the treatment of choice. Here, we review the available data on these newer induction regimens and to evaluate the potential impacts on the patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3262376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32623762012-01-30 Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter? Fung, Henry C Nathan, Sunita Maciejewski, John J Clin Pharmacol Mini-Review Autologous stem cell transplantation is the preferred treatment option for younger patients with symptomatic plasma cell myeloma. Most patients with newly diagnosed plasma cell myeloma receive 3–4 cycles of induction chemotherapy to achieve a level of disease control before proceeding to stem cell transplant. The ideal induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients shall allow more patients to proceed with transplant, rapidly and effectively control the disease, reverse disease-related complications, avoid early death, and is associated with minimal acute and long-term toxicities. Because of the concerns of potential damages to hematopoietic stem cells, alkylating agent regimens, specifically melphalan, are usually avoided for induction in transplant-eligible patients. Before the advance of immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitors, the combination of vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) and variants were the most commonly used induction regimens. Recent reports as discussed in this review suggests that VAD is no longer the induction chemotherapy of choice for transplant eligible patients. Newer regimens incorporating IMiD and/or proteasome inhibitor into the induction regimen improve response rates and progression-free survival before and after the transplant and are evolving as the treatment of choice. Here, we review the available data on these newer induction regimens and to evaluate the potential impacts on the patient outcomes. Dove Medical Press 2010-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3262376/ /pubmed/22291488 Text en © 2010 Fung et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mini-Review
Fung, Henry C
Nathan, Sunita
Maciejewski, John J
Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
title Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
title_full Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
title_fullStr Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
title_full_unstemmed Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
title_short Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
title_sort induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma – does it matter?
topic Mini-Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291488
work_keys_str_mv AT funghenryc inductionchemotherapybeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforsymptomaticplasmacellmyelomadoesitmatter
AT nathansunita inductionchemotherapybeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforsymptomaticplasmacellmyelomadoesitmatter
AT maciejewskijohnj inductionchemotherapybeforeautologousstemcelltransplantationforsymptomaticplasmacellmyelomadoesitmatter