Cargando…

Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking

BACKGROUND: Structural insight from transcription factor-DNA (TF-DNA) complexes is of paramount importance to our understanding of the affinity and specificity of TF-DNA interaction, and to the development of structure-based prediction of TF binding sites. Yet the majority of the TF-DNA complexes re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, RyangGuk, Corona, Rosario I, Hong, Bo, Guo, Jun-tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22044637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45
_version_ 1782221762642051072
author Kim, RyangGuk
Corona, Rosario I
Hong, Bo
Guo, Jun-tao
author_facet Kim, RyangGuk
Corona, Rosario I
Hong, Bo
Guo, Jun-tao
author_sort Kim, RyangGuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Structural insight from transcription factor-DNA (TF-DNA) complexes is of paramount importance to our understanding of the affinity and specificity of TF-DNA interaction, and to the development of structure-based prediction of TF binding sites. Yet the majority of the TF-DNA complexes remain unsolved despite the considerable experimental efforts being made. Computational docking represents a promising alternative to bridge the gap. To facilitate the study of TF-DNA docking, carefully designed benchmarks are needed for performance evaluation and identification of the strengths and weaknesses of docking algorithms. RESULTS: We constructed two benchmarks for flexible and rigid TF-DNA docking respectively using a unified non-redundant set of 38 test cases. The test cases encompass diverse fold families and are classified into easy and hard groups with respect to the degrees of difficulty in TF-DNA docking. The major parameters used to classify expected docking difficulty in flexible docking are the conformational differences between bound and unbound TFs and the interaction strength between TFs and DNA. For rigid docking in which the starting structure is a bound TF conformation, only interaction strength is considered. CONCLUSIONS: We believe these benchmarks are important for the development of better interaction potentials and TF-DNA docking algorithms, which bears important implications to structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites and drug design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3262759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32627592012-01-23 Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking Kim, RyangGuk Corona, Rosario I Hong, Bo Guo, Jun-tao BMC Struct Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Structural insight from transcription factor-DNA (TF-DNA) complexes is of paramount importance to our understanding of the affinity and specificity of TF-DNA interaction, and to the development of structure-based prediction of TF binding sites. Yet the majority of the TF-DNA complexes remain unsolved despite the considerable experimental efforts being made. Computational docking represents a promising alternative to bridge the gap. To facilitate the study of TF-DNA docking, carefully designed benchmarks are needed for performance evaluation and identification of the strengths and weaknesses of docking algorithms. RESULTS: We constructed two benchmarks for flexible and rigid TF-DNA docking respectively using a unified non-redundant set of 38 test cases. The test cases encompass diverse fold families and are classified into easy and hard groups with respect to the degrees of difficulty in TF-DNA docking. The major parameters used to classify expected docking difficulty in flexible docking are the conformational differences between bound and unbound TFs and the interaction strength between TFs and DNA. For rigid docking in which the starting structure is a bound TF conformation, only interaction strength is considered. CONCLUSIONS: We believe these benchmarks are important for the development of better interaction potentials and TF-DNA docking algorithms, which bears important implications to structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites and drug design. BioMed Central 2011-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3262759/ /pubmed/22044637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, RyangGuk
Corona, Rosario I
Hong, Bo
Guo, Jun-tao
Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking
title Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking
title_full Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking
title_fullStr Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking
title_short Benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-DNA docking
title_sort benchmarks for flexible and rigid transcription factor-dna docking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22044637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-45
work_keys_str_mv AT kimryangguk benchmarksforflexibleandrigidtranscriptionfactordnadocking
AT coronarosarioi benchmarksforflexibleandrigidtranscriptionfactordnadocking
AT hongbo benchmarksforflexibleandrigidtranscriptionfactordnadocking
AT guojuntao benchmarksforflexibleandrigidtranscriptionfactordnadocking