Cargando…
How to write a systematic review of reasons
Systematic reviews, which were developed to improve policy-making and clinical decision-making, answer an empirical question based on a minimally biased appraisal of all the relevant empirical studies. A model is presented here for writing systematic reviews of argument-based literature: literature...
Autores principales: | Strech, Daniel, Sofaer, Neema |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22080465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100096 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Need for Systematic Reviews of Reasons
por: Sofaer, Neema, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Questionable content of an industry-supported medical school lecture series: a case study
por: Persaud, Navindra
Publicado: (2014) -
Reciprocity-Based Reasons for Benefiting Research Participants: Most Fail, the Most Plausible is Problematic
por: Sofaer, Neema
Publicado: (2014) -
Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review
por: Sofaer, Neema, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons
por: Mertz, Marcel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)