Cargando…

Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant infection with polyoma viruses (BK and JC viruses) is an important cause of graft loss and nephropathy. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of BK and JC viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without graft dysfunction. METHODS: In a case-cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taheri, Shahram, Kafilzadeh, Farshid, Shafa, Maryam, Yaran, Majid, Mortazavi, Mojgan, Seirafian, Shiva, Shahidi, Shahrzad, Atapour, Abdolamir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22279460
_version_ 1782221809855234048
author Taheri, Shahram
Kafilzadeh, Farshid
Shafa, Maryam
Yaran, Majid
Mortazavi, Mojgan
Seirafian, Shiva
Shahidi, Shahrzad
Atapour, Abdolamir
author_facet Taheri, Shahram
Kafilzadeh, Farshid
Shafa, Maryam
Yaran, Majid
Mortazavi, Mojgan
Seirafian, Shiva
Shahidi, Shahrzad
Atapour, Abdolamir
author_sort Taheri, Shahram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-transplant infection with polyoma viruses (BK and JC viruses) is an important cause of graft loss and nephropathy. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of BK and JC viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without graft dysfunction. METHODS: In a case-control study, we selected 60 kidney transplant patients with and without graft dysfunction in the first two years after transplantation. Each group consisted of 30 patients evaluated for basic demographic and laboratory characteristics. First morning urine samples were sent for BK and JC virus detection with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and real-time polymerase PCR. Chi-square test with Yates’ correction, Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used as indicated. P value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in age, gender, and time after transplant and pretransplant dialysis. In both groups, seven patients (23.3%) were JC virus positive whereas in case group 14 patients (46.7%) and in control group 9 patients (30%) were BK virus positive. There were no statistical significant difference between case and control groups for both JC and BK virus infection rate. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that JC and BK virus infection is very prevalent in the first 2 years after transplant and might be monitored appropriately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3263105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32631052012-01-25 Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction Taheri, Shahram Kafilzadeh, Farshid Shafa, Maryam Yaran, Majid Mortazavi, Mojgan Seirafian, Shiva Shahidi, Shahrzad Atapour, Abdolamir J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Post-transplant infection with polyoma viruses (BK and JC viruses) is an important cause of graft loss and nephropathy. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of BK and JC viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without graft dysfunction. METHODS: In a case-control study, we selected 60 kidney transplant patients with and without graft dysfunction in the first two years after transplantation. Each group consisted of 30 patients evaluated for basic demographic and laboratory characteristics. First morning urine samples were sent for BK and JC virus detection with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and real-time polymerase PCR. Chi-square test with Yates’ correction, Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used as indicated. P value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in age, gender, and time after transplant and pretransplant dialysis. In both groups, seven patients (23.3%) were JC virus positive whereas in case group 14 patients (46.7%) and in control group 9 patients (30%) were BK virus positive. There were no statistical significant difference between case and control groups for both JC and BK virus infection rate. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that JC and BK virus infection is very prevalent in the first 2 years after transplant and might be monitored appropriately. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3263105/ /pubmed/22279460 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Taheri, Shahram
Kafilzadeh, Farshid
Shafa, Maryam
Yaran, Majid
Mortazavi, Mojgan
Seirafian, Shiva
Shahidi, Shahrzad
Atapour, Abdolamir
Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
title Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
title_full Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
title_fullStr Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
title_short Comparison of polyomavirus (BK virus and JC viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
title_sort comparison of polyomavirus (bk virus and jc viruses) viruria in renal transplant recipients with and without kidney dysfunction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22279460
work_keys_str_mv AT taherishahram comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT kafilzadehfarshid comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT shafamaryam comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT yaranmajid comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT mortazavimojgan comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT seirafianshiva comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT shahidishahrzad comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction
AT atapourabdolamir comparisonofpolyomavirusbkvirusandjcvirusesviruriainrenaltransplantrecipientswithandwithoutkidneydysfunction