Cargando…

Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?

CONTEXT: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures AIMS: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, George P., Das, Krishanu, Ramaswami, Krishnamohan, George, Datson P., Abraham, Jisha J., Thachil, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22279310
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91433
_version_ 1782221832339849216
author Abraham, George P.
Das, Krishanu
Ramaswami, Krishnamohan
George, Datson P.
Abraham, Jisha J.
Thachil, Thomas
author_facet Abraham, George P.
Das, Krishanu
Ramaswami, Krishnamohan
George, Datson P.
Abraham, Jisha J.
Thachil, Thomas
author_sort Abraham, George P.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures AIMS: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Single surgeon operative experience in two institutes. Retrospective analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were worked up in detail. All patients underwent cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography prior to laparoscopic approach. Patients were categorised into two groups: early repair (within seven days of inciting event) and delayed repair (after two weeks). Operative parameters and postoperative events were recorded. Postprocedure all patients were evaluated three monthly. Follow-up imaging was ordered at six months postoperatively. Improvement in renal function, resolution of hydronephrosis and unhindered drainage of contrast through the reconstructed unit on follow-up imaging was interpreted as a satisfactory outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mean, standard deviation, equal variance t test, Mann Whitney Z test, Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (37 units, 36 unilateral and 1 simultaneous bilateral) underwent laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction of lower ureteric stricture following iatrogenic injury - 21 early repair (Group I) and 15 delayed repair (Group II). All patients were hemodynamically stable at presentation. Early repair was more technically demanding with increased operation duration. There was no difference in blood loss, operative complications, postoperative parameters, or longterm outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopic repair of iatrogenically induced lower ureteric strictures can be conveniently undertaken without undue delay from the inciting event. Compared to delayed repairs, the procedure is technically more demanding but morbidity incurred and outcome is at par.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3263212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32632122012-01-25 Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? Abraham, George P. Das, Krishanu Ramaswami, Krishnamohan George, Datson P. Abraham, Jisha J. Thachil, Thomas Indian J Urol Original Article CONTEXT: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures AIMS: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Single surgeon operative experience in two institutes. Retrospective analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were worked up in detail. All patients underwent cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography prior to laparoscopic approach. Patients were categorised into two groups: early repair (within seven days of inciting event) and delayed repair (after two weeks). Operative parameters and postoperative events were recorded. Postprocedure all patients were evaluated three monthly. Follow-up imaging was ordered at six months postoperatively. Improvement in renal function, resolution of hydronephrosis and unhindered drainage of contrast through the reconstructed unit on follow-up imaging was interpreted as a satisfactory outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mean, standard deviation, equal variance t test, Mann Whitney Z test, Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (37 units, 36 unilateral and 1 simultaneous bilateral) underwent laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction of lower ureteric stricture following iatrogenic injury - 21 early repair (Group I) and 15 delayed repair (Group II). All patients were hemodynamically stable at presentation. Early repair was more technically demanding with increased operation duration. There was no difference in blood loss, operative complications, postoperative parameters, or longterm outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopic repair of iatrogenically induced lower ureteric strictures can be conveniently undertaken without undue delay from the inciting event. Compared to delayed repairs, the procedure is technically more demanding but morbidity incurred and outcome is at par. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3263212/ /pubmed/22279310 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91433 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abraham, George P.
Das, Krishanu
Ramaswami, Krishnamohan
George, Datson P.
Abraham, Jisha J.
Thachil, Thomas
Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_full Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_fullStr Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_short Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_sort laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: does timing of repair influence the outcome?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22279310
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91433
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamgeorgep laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT daskrishanu laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT ramaswamikrishnamohan laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT georgedatsonp laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT abrahamjishaj laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT thachilthomas laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome