Cargando…
Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
CONTEXT: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures AIMS: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22279310 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91433 |
_version_ | 1782221832339849216 |
---|---|
author | Abraham, George P. Das, Krishanu Ramaswami, Krishnamohan George, Datson P. Abraham, Jisha J. Thachil, Thomas |
author_facet | Abraham, George P. Das, Krishanu Ramaswami, Krishnamohan George, Datson P. Abraham, Jisha J. Thachil, Thomas |
author_sort | Abraham, George P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures AIMS: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Single surgeon operative experience in two institutes. Retrospective analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were worked up in detail. All patients underwent cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography prior to laparoscopic approach. Patients were categorised into two groups: early repair (within seven days of inciting event) and delayed repair (after two weeks). Operative parameters and postoperative events were recorded. Postprocedure all patients were evaluated three monthly. Follow-up imaging was ordered at six months postoperatively. Improvement in renal function, resolution of hydronephrosis and unhindered drainage of contrast through the reconstructed unit on follow-up imaging was interpreted as a satisfactory outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mean, standard deviation, equal variance t test, Mann Whitney Z test, Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (37 units, 36 unilateral and 1 simultaneous bilateral) underwent laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction of lower ureteric stricture following iatrogenic injury - 21 early repair (Group I) and 15 delayed repair (Group II). All patients were hemodynamically stable at presentation. Early repair was more technically demanding with increased operation duration. There was no difference in blood loss, operative complications, postoperative parameters, or longterm outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopic repair of iatrogenically induced lower ureteric strictures can be conveniently undertaken without undue delay from the inciting event. Compared to delayed repairs, the procedure is technically more demanding but morbidity incurred and outcome is at par. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3263212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32632122012-01-25 Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? Abraham, George P. Das, Krishanu Ramaswami, Krishnamohan George, Datson P. Abraham, Jisha J. Thachil, Thomas Indian J Urol Original Article CONTEXT: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures AIMS: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Single surgeon operative experience in two institutes. Retrospective analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were worked up in detail. All patients underwent cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography prior to laparoscopic approach. Patients were categorised into two groups: early repair (within seven days of inciting event) and delayed repair (after two weeks). Operative parameters and postoperative events were recorded. Postprocedure all patients were evaluated three monthly. Follow-up imaging was ordered at six months postoperatively. Improvement in renal function, resolution of hydronephrosis and unhindered drainage of contrast through the reconstructed unit on follow-up imaging was interpreted as a satisfactory outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mean, standard deviation, equal variance t test, Mann Whitney Z test, Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (37 units, 36 unilateral and 1 simultaneous bilateral) underwent laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction of lower ureteric stricture following iatrogenic injury - 21 early repair (Group I) and 15 delayed repair (Group II). All patients were hemodynamically stable at presentation. Early repair was more technically demanding with increased operation duration. There was no difference in blood loss, operative complications, postoperative parameters, or longterm outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopic repair of iatrogenically induced lower ureteric strictures can be conveniently undertaken without undue delay from the inciting event. Compared to delayed repairs, the procedure is technically more demanding but morbidity incurred and outcome is at par. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3263212/ /pubmed/22279310 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91433 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abraham, George P. Das, Krishanu Ramaswami, Krishnamohan George, Datson P. Abraham, Jisha J. Thachil, Thomas Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
title | Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
title_full | Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
title_short | Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
title_sort | laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: does timing of repair influence the outcome? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22279310 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamgeorgep laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome AT daskrishanu laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome AT ramaswamikrishnamohan laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome AT georgedatsonp laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome AT abrahamjishaj laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome AT thachilthomas laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome |