Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Minimally invasive techniques used in the evaluation and treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) include ultrasonography (US), computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, percutaneous and operative ablation therapy, standard laparoscopic techniques, robotic techniques, and experimental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gueorguiev, Anton L., Mackey, Richard, Kowdley, Gopal C., Esquivel, Jesus, Cunningham, Steven C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22312518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/686030
_version_ 1782221904713613312
author Gueorguiev, Anton L.
Mackey, Richard
Kowdley, Gopal C.
Esquivel, Jesus
Cunningham, Steven C.
author_facet Gueorguiev, Anton L.
Mackey, Richard
Kowdley, Gopal C.
Esquivel, Jesus
Cunningham, Steven C.
author_sort Gueorguiev, Anton L.
collection PubMed
description Minimally invasive techniques used in the evaluation and treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) include ultrasonography (US), computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, percutaneous and operative ablation therapy, standard laparoscopic techniques, robotic techniques, and experimental techniques of natural orifice endoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic techniques range from simple staging laparoscopy with or without laparoscopic intraoperative US, through intermediate techniques including simple liver resections (LRs), to advanced techniques such as major hepatectomies. Hereins, we review minimally invasive evaluation and treatment of CRLM, focusing on a comparison of open LR (OLR) and minimally invasive LR (MILR). Although there are no randomized trials comparing OLR and MILR, nonrandomized data suggest that MILR compares favorably with OLR regarding morbidity, mortality, LOS, and cost, although significant selection bias exists. The future of MILR will likely include expanding criteria for resectability of CRLM and should include both a patient registry and a formalized process for surgeon training and credentialing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3263653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32636532012-02-06 Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases Gueorguiev, Anton L. Mackey, Richard Kowdley, Gopal C. Esquivel, Jesus Cunningham, Steven C. Int J Surg Oncol Review Article Minimally invasive techniques used in the evaluation and treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) include ultrasonography (US), computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, percutaneous and operative ablation therapy, standard laparoscopic techniques, robotic techniques, and experimental techniques of natural orifice endoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic techniques range from simple staging laparoscopy with or without laparoscopic intraoperative US, through intermediate techniques including simple liver resections (LRs), to advanced techniques such as major hepatectomies. Hereins, we review minimally invasive evaluation and treatment of CRLM, focusing on a comparison of open LR (OLR) and minimally invasive LR (MILR). Although there are no randomized trials comparing OLR and MILR, nonrandomized data suggest that MILR compares favorably with OLR regarding morbidity, mortality, LOS, and cost, although significant selection bias exists. The future of MILR will likely include expanding criteria for resectability of CRLM and should include both a patient registry and a formalized process for surgeon training and credentialing. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3263653/ /pubmed/22312518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/686030 Text en Copyright © 2011 Anton L. Gueorguiev et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gueorguiev, Anton L.
Mackey, Richard
Kowdley, Gopal C.
Esquivel, Jesus
Cunningham, Steven C.
Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
title Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
title_full Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
title_short Minimally Invasive Evaluation and Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases
title_sort minimally invasive evaluation and treatment of colorectal liver metastases
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22312518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/686030
work_keys_str_mv AT gueorguievantonl minimallyinvasiveevaluationandtreatmentofcolorectallivermetastases
AT mackeyrichard minimallyinvasiveevaluationandtreatmentofcolorectallivermetastases
AT kowdleygopalc minimallyinvasiveevaluationandtreatmentofcolorectallivermetastases
AT esquiveljesus minimallyinvasiveevaluationandtreatmentofcolorectallivermetastases
AT cunninghamstevenc minimallyinvasiveevaluationandtreatmentofcolorectallivermetastases