How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence

In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand(™) (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Bleser, Leentje, De Geest, Sabina, Vandenbroeck, Sofie, Vanhaecke, Johan, Dobbels, Fabienne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100301652
_version_ 1782221960783069184
author De Bleser, Leentje
De Geest, Sabina
Vandenbroeck, Sofie
Vanhaecke, Johan
Dobbels, Fabienne
author_facet De Bleser, Leentje
De Geest, Sabina
Vandenbroeck, Sofie
Vanhaecke, Johan
Dobbels, Fabienne
author_sort De Bleser, Leentje
collection PubMed
description In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand(™) (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks. Accuracy was determined using the fixed manipulation scheme as the reference. Perfect functioning (i.e., total absence of missing registrations and/or overregistrations) was observed in 70% of the HH without, 87% of the HH with reminder, 20% MEMS with 18 months, and 100% with 2-year battery life respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3264443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32644432012-01-31 How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence De Bleser, Leentje De Geest, Sabina Vandenbroeck, Sofie Vanhaecke, Johan Dobbels, Fabienne Sensors (Basel) Article In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand(™) (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks. Accuracy was determined using the fixed manipulation scheme as the reference. Perfect functioning (i.e., total absence of missing registrations and/or overregistrations) was observed in 70% of the HH without, 87% of the HH with reminder, 20% MEMS with 18 months, and 100% with 2-year battery life respectively. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3264443/ /pubmed/22294891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100301652 Text en © 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Bleser, Leentje
De Geest, Sabina
Vandenbroeck, Sofie
Vanhaecke, Johan
Dobbels, Fabienne
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_full How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_fullStr How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_full_unstemmed How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_short How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_sort how accurate are electronic monitoring devices? a laboratory study testing two devices to measure medication adherence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s100301652
work_keys_str_mv AT debleserleentje howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT degeestsabina howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT vandenbroecksofie howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT vanhaeckejohan howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT dobbelsfabienne howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence

Ejemplares similares