Cargando…

Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities

BACKGROUND: Almost 90% of residents living in long-term care facilities have limited mobility which is associated with a loss of ability in activities of daily living, falls, increased risk of serious medical problems such as pressure ulcers, incontinence and a significant decline in health-related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slaughter, Susan E, Estabrooks, Carole A, Jones, C Allyson, Wagg, Adrian S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22176583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-84
_version_ 1782221974205890560
author Slaughter, Susan E
Estabrooks, Carole A
Jones, C Allyson
Wagg, Adrian S
author_facet Slaughter, Susan E
Estabrooks, Carole A
Jones, C Allyson
Wagg, Adrian S
author_sort Slaughter, Susan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Almost 90% of residents living in long-term care facilities have limited mobility which is associated with a loss of ability in activities of daily living, falls, increased risk of serious medical problems such as pressure ulcers, incontinence and a significant decline in health-related quality of life. For health workers caring for residents it may also increase the risk of injury. The effectiveness of rehabilitation to facilitate mobility has been studied with dedicated research assistants or extensively trained staff caregivers; however, few investigators have examined the effectiveness of techniques to encourage mobility by usual caregivers in long-term care facilities. METHODS/DESIGN: This longitudinal, quasi-experimental study is designed to demonstrate the effect of the sit-to-stand activity carried out by residents in the context of daily care with health care aides. In three intervention facilities health care aides will prompt residents to repeat the sit-to-stand action on two separate occasions during each day and each evening shift as part of daily care routines. In three control facilities residents will receive usual care. Intervention and control facilities are matched on the ownership model (public, private for-profit, voluntary not-for-profit) and facility size. The dose of the mobility intervention is assessed through the use of daily documentation flowsheets in the health record. Resident outcome measures include: 1) the 30-second sit-to-stand test; 2) the Functional Independence Measure; 3) the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3; and, 4) the Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease. DISCUSSION: There are several compelling reasons for this study: the widespread prevalence of limited mobility in this population; the rapid decline in mobility after admission to a long-term care facility; the importance of mobility to quality of life; the increased time (and therefore cost) required to care for residents with limited mobility; and, the increased risk of injury for health workers caring for residents who are unable to stand. The importance of these issues is magnified when considering the increasing number of people living in long-term care facilities and an aging population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT01474616).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3264506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32645062012-01-24 Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities Slaughter, Susan E Estabrooks, Carole A Jones, C Allyson Wagg, Adrian S BMC Geriatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Almost 90% of residents living in long-term care facilities have limited mobility which is associated with a loss of ability in activities of daily living, falls, increased risk of serious medical problems such as pressure ulcers, incontinence and a significant decline in health-related quality of life. For health workers caring for residents it may also increase the risk of injury. The effectiveness of rehabilitation to facilitate mobility has been studied with dedicated research assistants or extensively trained staff caregivers; however, few investigators have examined the effectiveness of techniques to encourage mobility by usual caregivers in long-term care facilities. METHODS/DESIGN: This longitudinal, quasi-experimental study is designed to demonstrate the effect of the sit-to-stand activity carried out by residents in the context of daily care with health care aides. In three intervention facilities health care aides will prompt residents to repeat the sit-to-stand action on two separate occasions during each day and each evening shift as part of daily care routines. In three control facilities residents will receive usual care. Intervention and control facilities are matched on the ownership model (public, private for-profit, voluntary not-for-profit) and facility size. The dose of the mobility intervention is assessed through the use of daily documentation flowsheets in the health record. Resident outcome measures include: 1) the 30-second sit-to-stand test; 2) the Functional Independence Measure; 3) the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3; and, 4) the Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease. DISCUSSION: There are several compelling reasons for this study: the widespread prevalence of limited mobility in this population; the rapid decline in mobility after admission to a long-term care facility; the importance of mobility to quality of life; the increased time (and therefore cost) required to care for residents with limited mobility; and, the increased risk of injury for health workers caring for residents who are unable to stand. The importance of these issues is magnified when considering the increasing number of people living in long-term care facilities and an aging population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT01474616). BioMed Central 2011-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3264506/ /pubmed/22176583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-84 Text en Copyright ©2011 Slaughter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Slaughter, Susan E
Estabrooks, Carole A
Jones, C Allyson
Wagg, Adrian S
Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
title Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
title_full Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
title_fullStr Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
title_full_unstemmed Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
title_short Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
title_sort mobility of vulnerable elders (move): study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-term care facilities
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22176583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-84
work_keys_str_mv AT slaughtersusane mobilityofvulnerableeldersmovestudyprotocoltoevaluatetheimplementationandoutcomesofamobilityinterventioninlongtermcarefacilities
AT estabrookscarolea mobilityofvulnerableeldersmovestudyprotocoltoevaluatetheimplementationandoutcomesofamobilityinterventioninlongtermcarefacilities
AT jonescallyson mobilityofvulnerableeldersmovestudyprotocoltoevaluatetheimplementationandoutcomesofamobilityinterventioninlongtermcarefacilities
AT waggadrians mobilityofvulnerableeldersmovestudyprotocoltoevaluatetheimplementationandoutcomesofamobilityinterventioninlongtermcarefacilities