Cargando…

The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions

Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chien, Yu-Wen, Levin, Bruce R., Klugman, Keith P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029219
_version_ 1782221985138343936
author Chien, Yu-Wen
Levin, Bruce R.
Klugman, Keith P.
author_facet Chien, Yu-Wen
Levin, Bruce R.
Klugman, Keith P.
author_sort Chien, Yu-Wen
collection PubMed
description Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3264555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32645552012-01-30 The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions Chien, Yu-Wen Levin, Bruce R. Klugman, Keith P. PLoS One Research Article Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage. Public Library of Science 2012-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3264555/ /pubmed/22291887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029219 Text en Chien et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chien, Yu-Wen
Levin, Bruce R.
Klugman, Keith P.
The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions
title The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions
title_full The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions
title_fullStr The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions
title_full_unstemmed The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions
title_short The Anticipated Severity of a “1918-Like” Influenza Pandemic in Contemporary Populations: The Contribution of Antibacterial Interventions
title_sort anticipated severity of a “1918-like” influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029219
work_keys_str_mv AT chienyuwen theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT levinbrucer theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT klugmankeithp theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT chienyuwen anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT levinbrucer anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT klugmankeithp anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions