Cargando…

Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margin (PSM) status following radical prostatectomy (RP) is a well-established prognostic factor. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether number of PSMs or bilaterality of PSMs might have prognostic significance for biochemical recurrence (BCR) in the populatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somford, Diederik M., van Oort, Inge M., Cosyns, Jean-Pierre, Witjes, J. Alfred, Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M., Tombal, Bertrand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21240506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0641-4
_version_ 1782222013335601152
author Somford, Diederik M.
van Oort, Inge M.
Cosyns, Jean-Pierre
Witjes, J. Alfred
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
Tombal, Bertrand
author_facet Somford, Diederik M.
van Oort, Inge M.
Cosyns, Jean-Pierre
Witjes, J. Alfred
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
Tombal, Bertrand
author_sort Somford, Diederik M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Positive surgical margin (PSM) status following radical prostatectomy (RP) is a well-established prognostic factor. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether number of PSMs or bilaterality of PSMs might have prognostic significance for biochemical recurrence (BCR) in the population with a PSM status following RP. METHODS: We evaluated 1,395 RP pathology reports from our center between 1980 and 2006. All patients who underwent (neo)-adjuvant therapy were excluded, leaving a cohort of 1,009 patients, with 249 (24.7%) subjects having a PSM at RP of whom 29.4% had multiple PSMs (≥ 2 sites), while 13.6% had bilateral PSMs. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 0–258 months). We used BCR-free survival as the primary study outcome. BCR was defined as any rise in PSA above or equal to 0.2 ng/ml. RESULTS: Of patients with a PSM status, 41% (95% CI: 33–49%) developed BCR within 5 years, compared to 12% (95% CI: 9–15%) in the population without a PSM. Multivariable analysis identified PSA at diagnosis and RP Gleason score as independent predictive factors for BCR. Increasing number and/or bilaterality of PSM did not lead to significant higher rates of BCR. CONCLUSION: In patients with a PSM, the number of positive sites or bilaterality of PSM status does not add prognostic information for risk of BCR. Survival curve slopes were different for patients with bilateral PSM, showing a significant tendency to progress to BCR earlier during follow-up than patients with unilateral PSM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3264849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32648492012-02-03 Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy Somford, Diederik M. van Oort, Inge M. Cosyns, Jean-Pierre Witjes, J. Alfred Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. Tombal, Bertrand World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Positive surgical margin (PSM) status following radical prostatectomy (RP) is a well-established prognostic factor. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether number of PSMs or bilaterality of PSMs might have prognostic significance for biochemical recurrence (BCR) in the population with a PSM status following RP. METHODS: We evaluated 1,395 RP pathology reports from our center between 1980 and 2006. All patients who underwent (neo)-adjuvant therapy were excluded, leaving a cohort of 1,009 patients, with 249 (24.7%) subjects having a PSM at RP of whom 29.4% had multiple PSMs (≥ 2 sites), while 13.6% had bilateral PSMs. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 0–258 months). We used BCR-free survival as the primary study outcome. BCR was defined as any rise in PSA above or equal to 0.2 ng/ml. RESULTS: Of patients with a PSM status, 41% (95% CI: 33–49%) developed BCR within 5 years, compared to 12% (95% CI: 9–15%) in the population without a PSM. Multivariable analysis identified PSA at diagnosis and RP Gleason score as independent predictive factors for BCR. Increasing number and/or bilaterality of PSM did not lead to significant higher rates of BCR. CONCLUSION: In patients with a PSM, the number of positive sites or bilaterality of PSM status does not add prognostic information for risk of BCR. Survival curve slopes were different for patients with bilateral PSM, showing a significant tendency to progress to BCR earlier during follow-up than patients with unilateral PSM. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-15 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3264849/ /pubmed/21240506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0641-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Somford, Diederik M.
van Oort, Inge M.
Cosyns, Jean-Pierre
Witjes, J. Alfred
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
Tombal, Bertrand
Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
title Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
title_full Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
title_short Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
title_sort prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21240506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0641-4
work_keys_str_mv AT somforddiederikm prognosticrelevanceofnumberandbilateralityofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT vanoortingem prognosticrelevanceofnumberandbilateralityofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT cosynsjeanpierre prognosticrelevanceofnumberandbilateralityofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT witjesjalfred prognosticrelevanceofnumberandbilateralityofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kiemeneylambertusalm prognosticrelevanceofnumberandbilateralityofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterradicalprostatectomy
AT tombalbertrand prognosticrelevanceofnumberandbilateralityofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterradicalprostatectomy