Cargando…
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery
Bariatric revision surgery is associated with several complications that can be attributed to decreased quality of tissue and complexity of the surgery. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a simple technique with potential advantages. Therefore, the results of this procedure were evaluated as a rev...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21866377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0501-3 |
_version_ | 1782222185398534144 |
---|---|
author | Berende, Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus de Zoete, Jean-Paul Smulders, Johannes Franciscus Nienhuijs, Simon Willem |
author_facet | Berende, Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus de Zoete, Jean-Paul Smulders, Johannes Franciscus Nienhuijs, Simon Willem |
author_sort | Berende, Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bariatric revision surgery is associated with several complications that can be attributed to decreased quality of tissue and complexity of the surgery. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a simple technique with potential advantages. Therefore, the results of this procedure were evaluated as a revisional option. Fifty-one patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Indications for the LSG were insufficient weight loss (34 patients, group 1) or vomiting (17 patients, group 2) following a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Patient and procedure characteristics as well as outcome were collected prospectively. From October 2006 to June 2010, 51 patients with a failed prior bariatic procedure (VBG or LAGB) were converted to (L)SG. The conversion rate was zero. The median procedure time was 99 min (range 54–221) and hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–38). There was no mortality after 30 days. Complications included bleeding (six) and leakage of the staple line (seven). Mean follow-up was 13.8 (2–46) months. LSG as revision surgery for insufficient weight loss resulted in extra weight loss of 52.7%, and the overall extra weight loss was 49.3%. When LSG was performed because of vomiting, 82% was able to eat solid food at follow-up. Of the 65 pre-existent co-morbidities, 21 were resolved and 18 improved. LSG as a revision procedure is feasible. An additional weight loss and further resolution of co-morbidity seem achievable, however, at the cost of a high number of complications. Therefore, revision bariatric surgery should be limited to expert tertiary bariatric centers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3266499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32664992012-02-03 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery Berende, Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus de Zoete, Jean-Paul Smulders, Johannes Franciscus Nienhuijs, Simon Willem Obes Surg Review Bariatric revision surgery is associated with several complications that can be attributed to decreased quality of tissue and complexity of the surgery. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a simple technique with potential advantages. Therefore, the results of this procedure were evaluated as a revisional option. Fifty-one patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Indications for the LSG were insufficient weight loss (34 patients, group 1) or vomiting (17 patients, group 2) following a laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Patient and procedure characteristics as well as outcome were collected prospectively. From October 2006 to June 2010, 51 patients with a failed prior bariatic procedure (VBG or LAGB) were converted to (L)SG. The conversion rate was zero. The median procedure time was 99 min (range 54–221) and hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–38). There was no mortality after 30 days. Complications included bleeding (six) and leakage of the staple line (seven). Mean follow-up was 13.8 (2–46) months. LSG as revision surgery for insufficient weight loss resulted in extra weight loss of 52.7%, and the overall extra weight loss was 49.3%. When LSG was performed because of vomiting, 82% was able to eat solid food at follow-up. Of the 65 pre-existent co-morbidities, 21 were resolved and 18 improved. LSG as a revision procedure is feasible. An additional weight loss and further resolution of co-morbidity seem achievable, however, at the cost of a high number of complications. Therefore, revision bariatric surgery should be limited to expert tertiary bariatric centers. Springer-Verlag 2011-08-25 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3266499/ /pubmed/21866377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0501-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Berende, Cornelis Adrianus Sebastianus de Zoete, Jean-Paul Smulders, Johannes Franciscus Nienhuijs, Simon Willem Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery |
title | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery |
title_full | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery |
title_short | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Feasible for Bariatric Revision Surgery |
title_sort | laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy feasible for bariatric revision surgery |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21866377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0501-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berendecornelisadrianussebastianus laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyfeasibleforbariatricrevisionsurgery AT dezoetejeanpaul laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyfeasibleforbariatricrevisionsurgery AT smuldersjohannesfranciscus laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyfeasibleforbariatricrevisionsurgery AT nienhuijssimonwillem laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyfeasibleforbariatricrevisionsurgery |