Cargando…
Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity
It has been suggested that excitatory and inhibitory inputs to cortical cells are balanced, and that this balance is important for the highly irregular firing observed in the cortex. There are two hypotheses as to the origin of this balance. One assumes that it results from a stable solution of the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002334 |
_version_ | 1782222216861057024 |
---|---|
author | Luz, Yotam Shamir, Maoz |
author_facet | Luz, Yotam Shamir, Maoz |
author_sort | Luz, Yotam |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been suggested that excitatory and inhibitory inputs to cortical cells are balanced, and that this balance is important for the highly irregular firing observed in the cortex. There are two hypotheses as to the origin of this balance. One assumes that it results from a stable solution of the recurrent neuronal dynamics. This model can account for a balance of steady state excitation and inhibition without fine tuning of parameters, but not for transient inputs. The second hypothesis suggests that the feed forward excitatory and inhibitory inputs to a postsynaptic cell are already balanced. This latter hypothesis thus does account for the balance of transient inputs. However, it remains unclear what mechanism underlies the fine tuning required for balancing feed forward excitatory and inhibitory inputs. Here we investigated whether inhibitory synaptic plasticity is responsible for the balance of transient feed forward excitation and inhibition. We address this issue in the framework of a model characterizing the stochastic dynamics of temporally anti-symmetric Hebbian spike timing dependent plasticity of feed forward excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to a single post-synaptic cell. Our analysis shows that inhibitory Hebbian plasticity generates ‘negative feedback’ that balances excitation and inhibition, which contrasts with the ‘positive feedback’ of excitatory Hebbian synaptic plasticity. As a result, this balance may increase the sensitivity of the learning dynamics to the correlation structure of the excitatory inputs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3266879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32668792012-01-30 Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity Luz, Yotam Shamir, Maoz PLoS Comput Biol Research Article It has been suggested that excitatory and inhibitory inputs to cortical cells are balanced, and that this balance is important for the highly irregular firing observed in the cortex. There are two hypotheses as to the origin of this balance. One assumes that it results from a stable solution of the recurrent neuronal dynamics. This model can account for a balance of steady state excitation and inhibition without fine tuning of parameters, but not for transient inputs. The second hypothesis suggests that the feed forward excitatory and inhibitory inputs to a postsynaptic cell are already balanced. This latter hypothesis thus does account for the balance of transient inputs. However, it remains unclear what mechanism underlies the fine tuning required for balancing feed forward excitatory and inhibitory inputs. Here we investigated whether inhibitory synaptic plasticity is responsible for the balance of transient feed forward excitation and inhibition. We address this issue in the framework of a model characterizing the stochastic dynamics of temporally anti-symmetric Hebbian spike timing dependent plasticity of feed forward excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to a single post-synaptic cell. Our analysis shows that inhibitory Hebbian plasticity generates ‘negative feedback’ that balances excitation and inhibition, which contrasts with the ‘positive feedback’ of excitatory Hebbian synaptic plasticity. As a result, this balance may increase the sensitivity of the learning dynamics to the correlation structure of the excitatory inputs. Public Library of Science 2012-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3266879/ /pubmed/22291583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002334 Text en Luz, Shamir. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luz, Yotam Shamir, Maoz Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity |
title | Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity |
title_full | Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity |
title_fullStr | Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity |
title_full_unstemmed | Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity |
title_short | Balancing Feed-Forward Excitation and Inhibition via Hebbian Inhibitory Synaptic Plasticity |
title_sort | balancing feed-forward excitation and inhibition via hebbian inhibitory synaptic plasticity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luzyotam balancingfeedforwardexcitationandinhibitionviahebbianinhibitorysynapticplasticity AT shamirmaoz balancingfeedforwardexcitationandinhibitionviahebbianinhibitorysynapticplasticity |