Cargando…
Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses?
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratomete...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Ophthalmological Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10 |
_version_ | 1782222359387701248 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Minwook Kang, Su-Yeon Kim, Hyo Myung |
author_facet | Chang, Minwook Kang, Su-Yeon Kim, Hyo Myung |
author_sort | Chang, Minwook |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. RESULTS: The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. CONCLUSIONS: Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3268162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Ophthalmological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32681622012-02-10 Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? Chang, Minwook Kang, Su-Yeon Kim, Hyo Myung Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. RESULTS: The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. CONCLUSIONS: Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012-02 2012-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3268162/ /pubmed/22323879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10 Text en © 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chang, Minwook Kang, Su-Yeon Kim, Hyo Myung Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
title | Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
title_full | Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
title_fullStr | Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
title_short | Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
title_sort | which keratometer is most reliable for correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changminwook whichkeratometerismostreliableforcorrectingastigmatismwithtoricintraocularlenses AT kangsuyeon whichkeratometerismostreliableforcorrectingastigmatismwithtoricintraocularlenses AT kimhyomyung whichkeratometerismostreliableforcorrectingastigmatismwithtoricintraocularlenses |