Cargando…

Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging

PURPOSE: To compare the changes in posterior corneal curvature using scanning slit topography (Orbscan II) and Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) before and after Epi-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. METHODS: In a prospective observational case-series study, 20 myopic patients having und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byun, Yong-Soo, Chung, So-Hyang, Park, Young-Geun, Joo, Choun-Ki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.6
_version_ 1782222361763774464
author Byun, Yong-Soo
Chung, So-Hyang
Park, Young-Geun
Joo, Choun-Ki
author_facet Byun, Yong-Soo
Chung, So-Hyang
Park, Young-Geun
Joo, Choun-Ki
author_sort Byun, Yong-Soo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the changes in posterior corneal curvature using scanning slit topography (Orbscan II) and Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) before and after Epi-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. METHODS: In a prospective observational case-series study, 20 myopic patients having undergone Epi-LASIK were examined serially with two different devices, Orbscan II and Pentacam, preoperatively and one month postoperatively. Posterior central elevation (PCE) and posterior maximal elevation (PME) were compared between the two devices, and the changes in parameters after Epi-LASIK were analyzed using a difference map. RESULTS: All parameters (preoperative and postoperative PCE and preoperative and postoperative PME) that were measured using the Orbscan II were significantly greater compared to those of the Pentacam (for all p < 0.001). PCE and PME were significantly increased one month postoperatively in the Orbscan II measurements (p < 0.05) but were not significantly increased in the Pentacam measurements. Also, ΔPCE and ΔPME, in the difference map obtained by each serial scanning, were significantly greater in the Orbscan II measurements than with the Pentacam (p = 0.012, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The Pentacam measurements displayed significantly reduced values in all parameters related to posterior corneal elevation compared to those of the Orbscan II. The Pentacam showed no significant change in posterior corneal curvature after Epi-LASIK, based on the difference map.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3268172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32681722012-02-10 Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging Byun, Yong-Soo Chung, So-Hyang Park, Young-Geun Joo, Choun-Ki Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the changes in posterior corneal curvature using scanning slit topography (Orbscan II) and Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) before and after Epi-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. METHODS: In a prospective observational case-series study, 20 myopic patients having undergone Epi-LASIK were examined serially with two different devices, Orbscan II and Pentacam, preoperatively and one month postoperatively. Posterior central elevation (PCE) and posterior maximal elevation (PME) were compared between the two devices, and the changes in parameters after Epi-LASIK were analyzed using a difference map. RESULTS: All parameters (preoperative and postoperative PCE and preoperative and postoperative PME) that were measured using the Orbscan II were significantly greater compared to those of the Pentacam (for all p < 0.001). PCE and PME were significantly increased one month postoperatively in the Orbscan II measurements (p < 0.05) but were not significantly increased in the Pentacam measurements. Also, ΔPCE and ΔPME, in the difference map obtained by each serial scanning, were significantly greater in the Orbscan II measurements than with the Pentacam (p = 0.012, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The Pentacam measurements displayed significantly reduced values in all parameters related to posterior corneal elevation compared to those of the Orbscan II. The Pentacam showed no significant change in posterior corneal curvature after Epi-LASIK, based on the difference map. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012-02 2012-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3268172/ /pubmed/22323878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.6 Text en © 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Byun, Yong-Soo
Chung, So-Hyang
Park, Young-Geun
Joo, Choun-Ki
Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging
title Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging
title_full Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging
title_fullStr Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging
title_short Posterior Corneal Curvature Assessment after Epi-LASIK for Myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam Imaging
title_sort posterior corneal curvature assessment after epi-lasik for myopia: comparison of orbscan ii and pentacam imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.6
work_keys_str_mv AT byunyongsoo posteriorcornealcurvatureassessmentafterepilasikformyopiacomparisonoforbscaniiandpentacamimaging
AT chungsohyang posteriorcornealcurvatureassessmentafterepilasikformyopiacomparisonoforbscaniiandpentacamimaging
AT parkyounggeun posteriorcornealcurvatureassessmentafterepilasikformyopiacomparisonoforbscaniiandpentacamimaging
AT joochounki posteriorcornealcurvatureassessmentafterepilasikformyopiacomparisonoforbscaniiandpentacamimaging