Cargando…

Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans

In this study, we assessed association of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) “hits” by race with adjustment for potential population stratification (PS) in two large, diverse study populations; the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS; N total = 3693 individuals) and the University of Pennsylvania...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S., Raska, Paola, Rebbeck, Timothy R., Millikan, Robert C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22303333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2011.00037
_version_ 1782222385943937024
author Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
Raska, Paola
Rebbeck, Timothy R.
Millikan, Robert C.
author_facet Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
Raska, Paola
Rebbeck, Timothy R.
Millikan, Robert C.
author_sort Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
collection PubMed
description In this study, we assessed association of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) “hits” by race with adjustment for potential population stratification (PS) in two large, diverse study populations; the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS; N total = 3693 individuals) and the University of Pennsylvania Study of Clinical Outcomes, Risk, and Ethnicity (SCORE; N total = 1135 individuals). In both study populations, 136 ancestry information markers and GWAS “hits” (CBCS: FGFR2, 8q24; SCORE: JAZF1, MSMB, 8q24) were genotyped. Principal component analysis was used to assess ancestral differences by race. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression was used to assess differences in cancer risk with and without adjustment for the first ancestral principal component (PC1) and for an interaction effect between PC1 and the GWAS “hit” (SNP) of interest. PC1 explained 53.7% of the variance for CBCS and 49.5% of the variance for SCORE. European Americans and African Americans were similar in their ancestral structure between CBCS and SCORE and cases and controls were well matched by ancestry. In the CBCS European Americans, 9/11 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment, but after adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect, only one SNP remained significant (rs1219648 in FGFR2); for CBCS African Americans, 6/11 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment and after adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect, all six SNPs remained significant and an additional SNP now became significant. In the SCORE European Americans, 0/9 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment and no changes were seen after additional adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect; for SCORE African Americans, 2/9 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment and after adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect, only one SNP remained significant (rs16901979 at 8q24). We show that genetic associations by race are modified by interaction between individual SNPs and PS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3268591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32685912012-02-02 Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S. Raska, Paola Rebbeck, Timothy R. Millikan, Robert C. Front Genet Genetics In this study, we assessed association of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) “hits” by race with adjustment for potential population stratification (PS) in two large, diverse study populations; the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS; N total = 3693 individuals) and the University of Pennsylvania Study of Clinical Outcomes, Risk, and Ethnicity (SCORE; N total = 1135 individuals). In both study populations, 136 ancestry information markers and GWAS “hits” (CBCS: FGFR2, 8q24; SCORE: JAZF1, MSMB, 8q24) were genotyped. Principal component analysis was used to assess ancestral differences by race. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression was used to assess differences in cancer risk with and without adjustment for the first ancestral principal component (PC1) and for an interaction effect between PC1 and the GWAS “hit” (SNP) of interest. PC1 explained 53.7% of the variance for CBCS and 49.5% of the variance for SCORE. European Americans and African Americans were similar in their ancestral structure between CBCS and SCORE and cases and controls were well matched by ancestry. In the CBCS European Americans, 9/11 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment, but after adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect, only one SNP remained significant (rs1219648 in FGFR2); for CBCS African Americans, 6/11 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment and after adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect, all six SNPs remained significant and an additional SNP now became significant. In the SCORE European Americans, 0/9 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment and no changes were seen after additional adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect; for SCORE African Americans, 2/9 SNPs were significant after PC1 adjustment and after adjustment for the PC1 by SNP interaction effect, only one SNP remained significant (rs16901979 at 8q24). We show that genetic associations by race are modified by interaction between individual SNPs and PS. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3268591/ /pubmed/22303333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2011.00037 Text en Copyright © 2011 Barnholtz-Sloan, Raska, Rebbeck and Millikan. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Genetics
Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
Raska, Paola
Rebbeck, Timothy R.
Millikan, Robert C.
Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans
title Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans
title_full Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans
title_fullStr Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans
title_full_unstemmed Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans
title_short Replication of GWAS “Hits” by Race for Breast and Prostate Cancers in European Americans and African Americans
title_sort replication of gwas “hits” by race for breast and prostate cancers in european americans and african americans
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22303333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2011.00037
work_keys_str_mv AT barnholtzsloanjills replicationofgwashitsbyraceforbreastandprostatecancersineuropeanamericansandafricanamericans
AT raskapaola replicationofgwashitsbyraceforbreastandprostatecancersineuropeanamericansandafricanamericans
AT rebbecktimothyr replicationofgwashitsbyraceforbreastandprostatecancersineuropeanamericansandafricanamericans
AT millikanrobertc replicationofgwashitsbyraceforbreastandprostatecancersineuropeanamericansandafricanamericans