Cargando…

Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example

Recently, there has been an increase and abundance of literature measuring flexicurity across countries. However, there is yet to be any agreement on the definition of the key concepts of flexicurity as well as the framework in which to base one’s research. Due to this, the outcomes found in the exi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chung, Heejung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9800-2
_version_ 1782222433606959104
author Chung, Heejung
author_facet Chung, Heejung
author_sort Chung, Heejung
collection PubMed
description Recently, there has been an increase and abundance of literature measuring flexicurity across countries. However, there is yet to be any agreement on the definition of the key concepts of flexicurity as well as the framework in which to base one’s research. Due to this, the outcomes found in the existing studies are rather diverse, far from reaching a consensus, and can be misleading. This paper addresses the issues by first introducing a framework, namely, the various levels and stages of flexicurity, as well as introducing some key issues that should be addressed when doing flexicurity indicators research. In addition, an empirical example is given to show how the framework derived can be used to carry out flexicurity research, and to show how by not regarding these frameworks one can come to misleading outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3268988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32689882012-02-16 Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example Chung, Heejung Soc Indic Res Article Recently, there has been an increase and abundance of literature measuring flexicurity across countries. However, there is yet to be any agreement on the definition of the key concepts of flexicurity as well as the framework in which to base one’s research. Due to this, the outcomes found in the existing studies are rather diverse, far from reaching a consensus, and can be misleading. This paper addresses the issues by first introducing a framework, namely, the various levels and stages of flexicurity, as well as introducing some key issues that should be addressed when doing flexicurity indicators research. In addition, an empirical example is given to show how the framework derived can be used to carry out flexicurity research, and to show how by not regarding these frameworks one can come to misleading outcomes. Springer Netherlands 2011-02-14 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3268988/ /pubmed/22347767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9800-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Chung, Heejung
Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example
title Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example
title_full Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example
title_fullStr Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example
title_short Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example
title_sort measuring flexicurity: precautionary notes, a new framework, and an empirical example
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9800-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chungheejung measuringflexicurityprecautionarynotesanewframeworkandanempiricalexample