Cargando…

Ribavirin Impairs Salivary gland function During Combination Treatment With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a In HEpatitis C patients

BACKGROUND: Xerostomia is a common adverse event of unknown etiology observed during pegylated interferon (PegIFN)/Ribavirin (Rbv) treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and mechanisms of xerostomia during PegIFN/Rbv therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one naïve patients with chronic hepat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aghemo, Alessio, Rumi, Maria Grazia, Monico, Sara, Banderali, Matteo, Russo, Antonio, Ottaviani, Francesco, Vigano, Mauro, D’Ambrosio, Roberta, Colombo, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3269061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22308157
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.733
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Xerostomia is a common adverse event of unknown etiology observed during pegylated interferon (PegIFN)/Ribavirin (Rbv) treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and mechanisms of xerostomia during PegIFN/Rbv therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C consecutively received PegIFN-α2a (180 μg/week) plus Rbv (800–1200 mg/day). The controls were 10 patients with chronic hepatitis B who received PegIFN-α2a (180 μg/week). During treatment and follow-up, all patients underwent basal and masticatory stimulated sialometry,otorhinolaryngoiatric (ORL) examination, and a questionnaire survey to subjectively assess symptoms of oral dryness. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients on PegIFN/Rbv and 4 on PegIFN (87% vs. 40%, P = 0.006) reported xerostomia. Thirty patients on PegIFN/Rbv combination therapy and 2 patients on monotherapy had ORL signs of salivary gland hypofunction (97% vs. 20%, P < 0.0001).Mean basal (A) and stimulated (B) salivary flow rates (mL/min) progressively decreased during PegIFN/Rbv treatment (A, 0.49 at baseline vs. 0.17 at the end of treatment, P < 0.0001; B, 1.24 at baseline vs. 0.53 at the end of treatment, P = 0.0004). At week 24 following PegIFN/Rbv treatment, salivary flow rates were similar to baseline (A, 0.53 at the end of follow-up vs. 0.49 at baseline; B, 1.19 at the end of follow-up vs. 1.24 at baseline). Salivary function was unaffected in monotherapy patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rbv causes salivary gland hypofunction in hepatitis C patients receiving PegIFN/Rbv therapy, which promptly reverts to normal upon cessation of treatment.