Cargando…

Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a comprehensive patient-reported outcomes instrument focusing on the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL). METHODS: Development and validation of the IDEEL occurred in four phases: 1) focus groups with 45 dry eye patients to develop a draft instrument, 2) ite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abetz, Linda, Rajagopalan, Krithika, Mertzanis, Polyxane, Begley, Carolyn, Barnes, Rod, Chalmers, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3269387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-111
_version_ 1782222468726915072
author Abetz, Linda
Rajagopalan, Krithika
Mertzanis, Polyxane
Begley, Carolyn
Barnes, Rod
Chalmers, Robin
author_facet Abetz, Linda
Rajagopalan, Krithika
Mertzanis, Polyxane
Begley, Carolyn
Barnes, Rod
Chalmers, Robin
author_sort Abetz, Linda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a comprehensive patient-reported outcomes instrument focusing on the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL). METHODS: Development and validation of the IDEEL occurred in four phases: 1) focus groups with 45 dry eye patients to develop a draft instrument, 2) item generation, 3) pilot study to assess content validity in 16 patients and 4) psychometric validation in 210 subjects: 130 with non-Sjögren's keratoconjunctivitis sicca, 32 with Sjögren's syndrome and 48 controls, and subsequent item reduction. RESULTS: Focus groups identified symptoms and the associated bother, the impact of dry eye on daily life and the patients' satisfaction with their treatment as the central concepts in patients' experience of dry eye. Qualitative analysis indicated that saturation was achieved for these concepts and yielded an initial 112-item draft instrument. Patients understood the questionnaire and found the items to be relevant indicating content validity. Patient input, item descriptive statistics and factor analysis identified 55 items that could be deleted. The final 57-item IDEEL assesses dry eye impact constituting 3 modules: dry eye symptom-bother, dry eye impact on daily life comprising impact on daily activities, emotional impact, impact on work, and dry eye treatment satisfaction comprising satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and treatment-related bother/inconvenience. The psychometric analysis results indicated that the IDEEL met the criteria for item discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and floor/ceiling effects. As expected, the correlations between IDEEL and the Dry Eye Questionnaire (a habitual symptom questionnaire) were higher than between IDEEL and Short-Form-36 and EuroQoL-5D, indicating concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The IDEEL is a reliable, valid and comprehensive questionnaire relevant to issues that are specific to dry eye patients, and meets current FDA patient-reported outcomes guidelines. The use of this questionnaire will provide assessment of the impact of dry eye on patient dry eye-related quality of life, impact of treatment on patient outcomes in clinical trials, and may aid in treatment effectiveness evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3269387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32693872012-02-01 Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients Abetz, Linda Rajagopalan, Krithika Mertzanis, Polyxane Begley, Carolyn Barnes, Rod Chalmers, Robin Health Qual Life Outcomes Research OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a comprehensive patient-reported outcomes instrument focusing on the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL). METHODS: Development and validation of the IDEEL occurred in four phases: 1) focus groups with 45 dry eye patients to develop a draft instrument, 2) item generation, 3) pilot study to assess content validity in 16 patients and 4) psychometric validation in 210 subjects: 130 with non-Sjögren's keratoconjunctivitis sicca, 32 with Sjögren's syndrome and 48 controls, and subsequent item reduction. RESULTS: Focus groups identified symptoms and the associated bother, the impact of dry eye on daily life and the patients' satisfaction with their treatment as the central concepts in patients' experience of dry eye. Qualitative analysis indicated that saturation was achieved for these concepts and yielded an initial 112-item draft instrument. Patients understood the questionnaire and found the items to be relevant indicating content validity. Patient input, item descriptive statistics and factor analysis identified 55 items that could be deleted. The final 57-item IDEEL assesses dry eye impact constituting 3 modules: dry eye symptom-bother, dry eye impact on daily life comprising impact on daily activities, emotional impact, impact on work, and dry eye treatment satisfaction comprising satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and treatment-related bother/inconvenience. The psychometric analysis results indicated that the IDEEL met the criteria for item discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and floor/ceiling effects. As expected, the correlations between IDEEL and the Dry Eye Questionnaire (a habitual symptom questionnaire) were higher than between IDEEL and Short-Form-36 and EuroQoL-5D, indicating concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The IDEEL is a reliable, valid and comprehensive questionnaire relevant to issues that are specific to dry eye patients, and meets current FDA patient-reported outcomes guidelines. The use of this questionnaire will provide assessment of the impact of dry eye on patient dry eye-related quality of life, impact of treatment on patient outcomes in clinical trials, and may aid in treatment effectiveness evaluation. BioMed Central 2011-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3269387/ /pubmed/22152125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-111 Text en Copyright ©2011 Abetz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Abetz, Linda
Rajagopalan, Krithika
Mertzanis, Polyxane
Begley, Carolyn
Barnes, Rod
Chalmers, Robin
Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
title Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
title_full Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
title_fullStr Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
title_short Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
title_sort development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (ideel) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (pro) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3269387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-111
work_keys_str_mv AT abetzlinda developmentandvalidationoftheimpactofdryeyeoneverydaylifeideelquestionnaireapatientreportedoutcomespromeasurefortheassessmentoftheburdenofdryeyeonpatients
AT rajagopalankrithika developmentandvalidationoftheimpactofdryeyeoneverydaylifeideelquestionnaireapatientreportedoutcomespromeasurefortheassessmentoftheburdenofdryeyeonpatients
AT mertzanispolyxane developmentandvalidationoftheimpactofdryeyeoneverydaylifeideelquestionnaireapatientreportedoutcomespromeasurefortheassessmentoftheburdenofdryeyeonpatients
AT begleycarolyn developmentandvalidationoftheimpactofdryeyeoneverydaylifeideelquestionnaireapatientreportedoutcomespromeasurefortheassessmentoftheburdenofdryeyeonpatients
AT barnesrod developmentandvalidationoftheimpactofdryeyeoneverydaylifeideelquestionnaireapatientreportedoutcomespromeasurefortheassessmentoftheburdenofdryeyeonpatients
AT chalmersrobin developmentandvalidationoftheimpactofdryeyeoneverydaylifeideelquestionnaireapatientreportedoutcomespromeasurefortheassessmentoftheburdenofdryeyeonpatients