Cargando…

Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax

BACKGROUND: It has recently become most general to use the small bore catheter to perform closed thoracostomy in treating iatrogenic pneumothorax. This study was performed for analysis of the efficacy of treatment methods by using small bore catheter such as 7 F (French) central venous catheter, 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noh, Tae Ook, Ryu, Kyoung Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22324027
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.6.418
_version_ 1782222553307152384
author Noh, Tae Ook
Ryu, Kyoung Min
author_facet Noh, Tae Ook
Ryu, Kyoung Min
author_sort Noh, Tae Ook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has recently become most general to use the small bore catheter to perform closed thoracostomy in treating iatrogenic pneumothorax. This study was performed for analysis of the efficacy of treatment methods by using small bore catheter such as 7 F (French) central venous catheter, 10 F trocar catheter, 12 F pigtail catheter and for analysis of the appropriateness of each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2007 to February 2010, Retrospective review of 105 patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax, who underwent closed thoracostomy by using small bore catheter, was performed. We analyzed the total success rate for all procedures as well as the individual success rate for each procedure, and analyzed the cause of failure, additional treatment method for failure, influential factors of treatment outcome, and complications. RESULTS: The most common causes of iatrogenic pneumothorax were presented as percutaneous needle aspiration(PCNA) in 48 cases (45.7%), and central venous catheterization in 26 cases (24.8%). The mean interval to thoracostomy after the procedure was measured as 5.2 hours (1~34 hours). Total success rate of thoracostomy was 78.1%. The success rate was not significantly difference by tube type, with 7 F central venous catheter as 80%, 10 F trocar catheter as 81.6%, and 12 F pigtail catheter as 71%. Twenty one out of 23 patients that had failed with small bore catheter treatment added large bore conventional thoracostomy, and another 2 patients received surgery. The causes for treatment failure were presented as continuous air leakage in 12 cases (52.2%) and tube malfunction in 7 cases (30%). The causes for failure did not present significant differences by tube type. Statistically significant factors affecting treatment performance were not discovered. CONCLUSION: Closed thoracostomy with small bore catheter proved to be effective for iatrogenic pneumothorax. The success rate was not difference for each type. However, it is important to select the appropriate catheter by considering the patient status, pneumothorax aspect, and medical personnel in the cardiothoracic surgery department of the relevant hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3270284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32702842012-02-09 Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Noh, Tae Ook Ryu, Kyoung Min Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: It has recently become most general to use the small bore catheter to perform closed thoracostomy in treating iatrogenic pneumothorax. This study was performed for analysis of the efficacy of treatment methods by using small bore catheter such as 7 F (French) central venous catheter, 10 F trocar catheter, 12 F pigtail catheter and for analysis of the appropriateness of each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2007 to February 2010, Retrospective review of 105 patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax, who underwent closed thoracostomy by using small bore catheter, was performed. We analyzed the total success rate for all procedures as well as the individual success rate for each procedure, and analyzed the cause of failure, additional treatment method for failure, influential factors of treatment outcome, and complications. RESULTS: The most common causes of iatrogenic pneumothorax were presented as percutaneous needle aspiration(PCNA) in 48 cases (45.7%), and central venous catheterization in 26 cases (24.8%). The mean interval to thoracostomy after the procedure was measured as 5.2 hours (1~34 hours). Total success rate of thoracostomy was 78.1%. The success rate was not significantly difference by tube type, with 7 F central venous catheter as 80%, 10 F trocar catheter as 81.6%, and 12 F pigtail catheter as 71%. Twenty one out of 23 patients that had failed with small bore catheter treatment added large bore conventional thoracostomy, and another 2 patients received surgery. The causes for treatment failure were presented as continuous air leakage in 12 cases (52.2%) and tube malfunction in 7 cases (30%). The causes for failure did not present significant differences by tube type. Statistically significant factors affecting treatment performance were not discovered. CONCLUSION: Closed thoracostomy with small bore catheter proved to be effective for iatrogenic pneumothorax. The success rate was not difference for each type. However, it is important to select the appropriate catheter by considering the patient status, pneumothorax aspect, and medical personnel in the cardiothoracic surgery department of the relevant hospital. Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011-12 2011-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3270284/ /pubmed/22324027 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.6.418 Text en © The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011. All right reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Noh, Tae Ook
Ryu, Kyoung Min
Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
title Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
title_full Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
title_fullStr Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
title_short Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax
title_sort comparative study for the efficacy of small bore catheter in the patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22324027
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.6.418
work_keys_str_mv AT nohtaeook comparativestudyfortheefficacyofsmallborecatheterinthepatientswithiatrogenicpneumothorax
AT ryukyoungmin comparativestudyfortheefficacyofsmallborecatheterinthepatientswithiatrogenicpneumothorax