Cargando…

The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of the size of the light exposed pupil in one eye on the pupillary light reflex of the other eye. Method: Using a monochromatic pupillometer, the left eye in each of 10 healthy subjects was exposed to 20 s of monochromatic light of luminance 300 cd/m(2), first red...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nissen, Claus, Sander, Birgit, Lund-Andersen, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22319506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2011.00092
_version_ 1782222560558055424
author Nissen, Claus
Sander, Birgit
Lund-Andersen, Henrik
author_facet Nissen, Claus
Sander, Birgit
Lund-Andersen, Henrik
author_sort Nissen, Claus
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate the influence of the size of the light exposed pupil in one eye on the pupillary light reflex of the other eye. Method: Using a monochromatic pupillometer, the left eye in each of 10 healthy subjects was exposed to 20 s of monochromatic light of luminance 300 cd/m(2), first red (660 nm) and in a following session, blue (470 nm) light. The consensual pupillary diameter in the right eye was continuously measured before, during, and after light exposure. Subsequently, Tropicamide 1% or Pilocarpine 2% was instilled into the left eye and when the pupil was either maximally dilated or contracted, the entire sequence of red and blue light exposure repeated. After at least 3 days, when the effect of the eye drop had subsided, the entire experiment was repeated, this time employing the other substance. Results: Prior dilatation of the left pupil augmented the post light contraction to blue (p < 0.0001), but not to red light. The contraction during light exposure did not change. Prior contraction of the left pupil decreased the post-stimulus contraction to blue light (p < 0.04). Conclusion: The size of the light exposed pupil influences the magnitude of the response to blue, but not to red light. Prior dilatation may therefore prove useful, when the response to blue light – as a marker of melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cell function – is of interest, especially when this response is weak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3270334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32703342012-02-08 The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry Nissen, Claus Sander, Birgit Lund-Andersen, Henrik Front Neurol Neuroscience Purpose: To evaluate the influence of the size of the light exposed pupil in one eye on the pupillary light reflex of the other eye. Method: Using a monochromatic pupillometer, the left eye in each of 10 healthy subjects was exposed to 20 s of monochromatic light of luminance 300 cd/m(2), first red (660 nm) and in a following session, blue (470 nm) light. The consensual pupillary diameter in the right eye was continuously measured before, during, and after light exposure. Subsequently, Tropicamide 1% or Pilocarpine 2% was instilled into the left eye and when the pupil was either maximally dilated or contracted, the entire sequence of red and blue light exposure repeated. After at least 3 days, when the effect of the eye drop had subsided, the entire experiment was repeated, this time employing the other substance. Results: Prior dilatation of the left pupil augmented the post light contraction to blue (p < 0.0001), but not to red light. The contraction during light exposure did not change. Prior contraction of the left pupil decreased the post-stimulus contraction to blue light (p < 0.04). Conclusion: The size of the light exposed pupil influences the magnitude of the response to blue, but not to red light. Prior dilatation may therefore prove useful, when the response to blue light – as a marker of melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cell function – is of interest, especially when this response is weak. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3270334/ /pubmed/22319506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2011.00092 Text en Copyright © 2012 Nissen, Sander and Lund-Andersen. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Nissen, Claus
Sander, Birgit
Lund-Andersen, Henrik
The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry
title The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry
title_full The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry
title_fullStr The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry
title_short The Effect of Pupil Size on Stimulation of the Melanopsin Containing Retinal Ganglion Cells, as Evaluated by Monochromatic Pupillometry
title_sort effect of pupil size on stimulation of the melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cells, as evaluated by monochromatic pupillometry
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22319506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2011.00092
work_keys_str_mv AT nissenclaus theeffectofpupilsizeonstimulationofthemelanopsincontainingretinalganglioncellsasevaluatedbymonochromaticpupillometry
AT sanderbirgit theeffectofpupilsizeonstimulationofthemelanopsincontainingretinalganglioncellsasevaluatedbymonochromaticpupillometry
AT lundandersenhenrik theeffectofpupilsizeonstimulationofthemelanopsincontainingretinalganglioncellsasevaluatedbymonochromaticpupillometry
AT nissenclaus effectofpupilsizeonstimulationofthemelanopsincontainingretinalganglioncellsasevaluatedbymonochromaticpupillometry
AT sanderbirgit effectofpupilsizeonstimulationofthemelanopsincontainingretinalganglioncellsasevaluatedbymonochromaticpupillometry
AT lundandersenhenrik effectofpupilsizeonstimulationofthemelanopsincontainingretinalganglioncellsasevaluatedbymonochromaticpupillometry