Cargando…

Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?

Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between “asymptomatic” and “symptomatic” presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of curren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios, Wolf, Marc E., Schaefer, Anke, Hennerici, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/340798
_version_ 1782222587553644544
author Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios
Wolf, Marc E.
Schaefer, Anke
Hennerici, Michael G.
author_facet Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios
Wolf, Marc E.
Schaefer, Anke
Hennerici, Michael G.
author_sort Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios
collection PubMed
description Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between “asymptomatic” and “symptomatic” presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of current studies on interventional treatment versus surgery. Both terms, however, only address different phases of activity of the one and the same condition and blur the significant message that carotid stenosis is a most important marker of systemic atherosclerosis, which is accompanied by a much higher risk of cardiovascular events rather than stroke. As a consequence, early diagnosis and followup during best medical treatment, life-style management, regular cardiovascular assessment, and good control of all vascular risk factors should be recommended in all patients with carotid stenosis—whether identified in the long-lasting “silent” or short-lasting “vulnerable” period lasting only a few weeks after cerebral ischemia. Patients in this short time window benefit from additional carotid intervention, under the condition of an individually favorable benefit-risk ratio (“individual vulnerability”).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3270474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32704742012-02-07 Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios Wolf, Marc E. Schaefer, Anke Hennerici, Michael G. Stroke Res Treat Review Article Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between “asymptomatic” and “symptomatic” presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of current studies on interventional treatment versus surgery. Both terms, however, only address different phases of activity of the one and the same condition and blur the significant message that carotid stenosis is a most important marker of systemic atherosclerosis, which is accompanied by a much higher risk of cardiovascular events rather than stroke. As a consequence, early diagnosis and followup during best medical treatment, life-style management, regular cardiovascular assessment, and good control of all vascular risk factors should be recommended in all patients with carotid stenosis—whether identified in the long-lasting “silent” or short-lasting “vulnerable” period lasting only a few weeks after cerebral ischemia. Patients in this short time window benefit from additional carotid intervention, under the condition of an individually favorable benefit-risk ratio (“individual vulnerability”). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3270474/ /pubmed/22315705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/340798 Text en Copyright © 2012 Anastasios Chatzikonstantinou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios
Wolf, Marc E.
Schaefer, Anke
Hennerici, Michael G.
Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
title Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
title_full Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
title_fullStr Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
title_full_unstemmed Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
title_short Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
title_sort asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis: an obsolete classification?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/340798
work_keys_str_mv AT chatzikonstantinouanastasios asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification
AT wolfmarce asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification
AT schaeferanke asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification
AT hennericimichaelg asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification