Cargando…
Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification?
Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between “asymptomatic” and “symptomatic” presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of curren...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/340798 |
_version_ | 1782222587553644544 |
---|---|
author | Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios Wolf, Marc E. Schaefer, Anke Hennerici, Michael G. |
author_facet | Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios Wolf, Marc E. Schaefer, Anke Hennerici, Michael G. |
author_sort | Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between “asymptomatic” and “symptomatic” presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of current studies on interventional treatment versus surgery. Both terms, however, only address different phases of activity of the one and the same condition and blur the significant message that carotid stenosis is a most important marker of systemic atherosclerosis, which is accompanied by a much higher risk of cardiovascular events rather than stroke. As a consequence, early diagnosis and followup during best medical treatment, life-style management, regular cardiovascular assessment, and good control of all vascular risk factors should be recommended in all patients with carotid stenosis—whether identified in the long-lasting “silent” or short-lasting “vulnerable” period lasting only a few weeks after cerebral ischemia. Patients in this short time window benefit from additional carotid intervention, under the condition of an individually favorable benefit-risk ratio (“individual vulnerability”). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3270474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32704742012-02-07 Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios Wolf, Marc E. Schaefer, Anke Hennerici, Michael G. Stroke Res Treat Review Article Since many years, clinical decisions about the management of patients with carotid stenosis have been based on the distinction between “asymptomatic” and “symptomatic” presentations. This was also reflected by the design of previous studies on the surgical versus conservative treatment and of current studies on interventional treatment versus surgery. Both terms, however, only address different phases of activity of the one and the same condition and blur the significant message that carotid stenosis is a most important marker of systemic atherosclerosis, which is accompanied by a much higher risk of cardiovascular events rather than stroke. As a consequence, early diagnosis and followup during best medical treatment, life-style management, regular cardiovascular assessment, and good control of all vascular risk factors should be recommended in all patients with carotid stenosis—whether identified in the long-lasting “silent” or short-lasting “vulnerable” period lasting only a few weeks after cerebral ischemia. Patients in this short time window benefit from additional carotid intervention, under the condition of an individually favorable benefit-risk ratio (“individual vulnerability”). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3270474/ /pubmed/22315705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/340798 Text en Copyright © 2012 Anastasios Chatzikonstantinou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chatzikonstantinou, Anastasios Wolf, Marc E. Schaefer, Anke Hennerici, Michael G. Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? |
title | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? |
title_full | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? |
title_fullStr | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? |
title_full_unstemmed | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? |
title_short | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Obsolete Classification? |
title_sort | asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis: an obsolete classification? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/340798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chatzikonstantinouanastasios asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification AT wolfmarce asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification AT schaeferanke asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification AT hennericimichaelg asymptomaticandsymptomaticcarotidstenosisanobsoleteclassification |