Cargando…

The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND: Decision aids help physicians convey information to patients and enable patients to be involved in the decision-making process. There is a lack of use of decision aids in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to develop a decision board to elicit preferences for treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alolabi, Bashar, Shirali, Janhavi, Bajammal, Sohail, Karanicolas, Paul J., Zlowodzki, Michael, Gafni, Amiram, Bhandari, Mohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91631
_version_ 1782222609037918208
author Alolabi, Bashar
Shirali, Janhavi
Bajammal, Sohail
Karanicolas, Paul J.
Zlowodzki, Michael
Gafni, Amiram
Bhandari, Mohit
author_facet Alolabi, Bashar
Shirali, Janhavi
Bajammal, Sohail
Karanicolas, Paul J.
Zlowodzki, Michael
Gafni, Amiram
Bhandari, Mohit
author_sort Alolabi, Bashar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision aids help physicians convey information to patients and enable patients to be involved in the decision-making process. There is a lack of use of decision aids in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to develop a decision board to elicit preferences for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a decision board presenting descriptions and potential outcomes and complications of two treatment options, hemiarthroplasty (HA) and internal fixation (IF), for displaced femoral neck fractures. Five orthopedic surgeons evaluated the face and content validity of the decision board and 10 volunteers completed “scope tests” to determine the comprehensibility. We then presented the decision board to 108 study participants faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture. Participants stated their preference for operative procedure and described the reasons for their choices. RESULTS: The decision board achieved good face and content validity. All participants in the scope tests appropriately switched their preference to the other modality when probabilities were altered. Most participants found the decision board easy to understand and helpful in making an informed decision. Also, most participants were satisfied with the amount of information presented and with the use of the decision board as a decision making tool. Sixty-one participants (56%) chose IF as their operative procedure of choice quoting less blood loss, shorter operative time, and less invasiveness as the top factors that contributed to this choice. Participants who preferred HA (44%) did so primarily due to the lower re-operation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The decision board is a useful and reliable tool to inform patients about the treatment options for displaced femoral neck fractures. They should be utilized by surgeons to incorporate patients’ preferences into the decision-making process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3270601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32706012012-02-15 The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures Alolabi, Bashar Shirali, Janhavi Bajammal, Sohail Karanicolas, Paul J. Zlowodzki, Michael Gafni, Amiram Bhandari, Mohit Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Decision aids help physicians convey information to patients and enable patients to be involved in the decision-making process. There is a lack of use of decision aids in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to develop a decision board to elicit preferences for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a decision board presenting descriptions and potential outcomes and complications of two treatment options, hemiarthroplasty (HA) and internal fixation (IF), for displaced femoral neck fractures. Five orthopedic surgeons evaluated the face and content validity of the decision board and 10 volunteers completed “scope tests” to determine the comprehensibility. We then presented the decision board to 108 study participants faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture. Participants stated their preference for operative procedure and described the reasons for their choices. RESULTS: The decision board achieved good face and content validity. All participants in the scope tests appropriately switched their preference to the other modality when probabilities were altered. Most participants found the decision board easy to understand and helpful in making an informed decision. Also, most participants were satisfied with the amount of information presented and with the use of the decision board as a decision making tool. Sixty-one participants (56%) chose IF as their operative procedure of choice quoting less blood loss, shorter operative time, and less invasiveness as the top factors that contributed to this choice. Participants who preferred HA (44%) did so primarily due to the lower re-operation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The decision board is a useful and reliable tool to inform patients about the treatment options for displaced femoral neck fractures. They should be utilized by surgeons to incorporate patients’ preferences into the decision-making process. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3270601/ /pubmed/22345803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91631 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alolabi, Bashar
Shirali, Janhavi
Bajammal, Sohail
Karanicolas, Paul J.
Zlowodzki, Michael
Gafni, Amiram
Bhandari, Mohit
The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
title The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
title_full The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
title_fullStr The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
title_full_unstemmed The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
title_short The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
title_sort development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91631
work_keys_str_mv AT alolabibashar thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT shiralijanhavi thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT bajammalsohail thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT karanicolaspaulj thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT zlowodzkimichael thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT gafniamiram thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT bhandarimohit thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT alolabibashar developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT shiralijanhavi developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT bajammalsohail developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT karanicolaspaulj developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT zlowodzkimichael developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT gafniamiram developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures
AT bhandarimohit developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures