Cargando…
The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures
BACKGROUND: Decision aids help physicians convey information to patients and enable patients to be involved in the decision-making process. There is a lack of use of decision aids in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to develop a decision board to elicit preferences for treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91631 |
_version_ | 1782222609037918208 |
---|---|
author | Alolabi, Bashar Shirali, Janhavi Bajammal, Sohail Karanicolas, Paul J. Zlowodzki, Michael Gafni, Amiram Bhandari, Mohit |
author_facet | Alolabi, Bashar Shirali, Janhavi Bajammal, Sohail Karanicolas, Paul J. Zlowodzki, Michael Gafni, Amiram Bhandari, Mohit |
author_sort | Alolabi, Bashar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decision aids help physicians convey information to patients and enable patients to be involved in the decision-making process. There is a lack of use of decision aids in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to develop a decision board to elicit preferences for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a decision board presenting descriptions and potential outcomes and complications of two treatment options, hemiarthroplasty (HA) and internal fixation (IF), for displaced femoral neck fractures. Five orthopedic surgeons evaluated the face and content validity of the decision board and 10 volunteers completed “scope tests” to determine the comprehensibility. We then presented the decision board to 108 study participants faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture. Participants stated their preference for operative procedure and described the reasons for their choices. RESULTS: The decision board achieved good face and content validity. All participants in the scope tests appropriately switched their preference to the other modality when probabilities were altered. Most participants found the decision board easy to understand and helpful in making an informed decision. Also, most participants were satisfied with the amount of information presented and with the use of the decision board as a decision making tool. Sixty-one participants (56%) chose IF as their operative procedure of choice quoting less blood loss, shorter operative time, and less invasiveness as the top factors that contributed to this choice. Participants who preferred HA (44%) did so primarily due to the lower re-operation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The decision board is a useful and reliable tool to inform patients about the treatment options for displaced femoral neck fractures. They should be utilized by surgeons to incorporate patients’ preferences into the decision-making process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3270601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32706012012-02-15 The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures Alolabi, Bashar Shirali, Janhavi Bajammal, Sohail Karanicolas, Paul J. Zlowodzki, Michael Gafni, Amiram Bhandari, Mohit Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Decision aids help physicians convey information to patients and enable patients to be involved in the decision-making process. There is a lack of use of decision aids in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to develop a decision board to elicit preferences for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a decision board presenting descriptions and potential outcomes and complications of two treatment options, hemiarthroplasty (HA) and internal fixation (IF), for displaced femoral neck fractures. Five orthopedic surgeons evaluated the face and content validity of the decision board and 10 volunteers completed “scope tests” to determine the comprehensibility. We then presented the decision board to 108 study participants faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture. Participants stated their preference for operative procedure and described the reasons for their choices. RESULTS: The decision board achieved good face and content validity. All participants in the scope tests appropriately switched their preference to the other modality when probabilities were altered. Most participants found the decision board easy to understand and helpful in making an informed decision. Also, most participants were satisfied with the amount of information presented and with the use of the decision board as a decision making tool. Sixty-one participants (56%) chose IF as their operative procedure of choice quoting less blood loss, shorter operative time, and less invasiveness as the top factors that contributed to this choice. Participants who preferred HA (44%) did so primarily due to the lower re-operation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The decision board is a useful and reliable tool to inform patients about the treatment options for displaced femoral neck fractures. They should be utilized by surgeons to incorporate patients’ preferences into the decision-making process. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3270601/ /pubmed/22345803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91631 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alolabi, Bashar Shirali, Janhavi Bajammal, Sohail Karanicolas, Paul J. Zlowodzki, Michael Gafni, Amiram Bhandari, Mohit The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
title | The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_full | The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_fullStr | The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_short | The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_sort | development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alolabibashar thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT shiralijanhavi thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT bajammalsohail thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT karanicolaspaulj thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT zlowodzkimichael thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT gafniamiram thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT bhandarimohit thedevelopmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT alolabibashar developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT shiralijanhavi developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT bajammalsohail developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT karanicolaspaulj developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT zlowodzkimichael developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT gafniamiram developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT bhandarimohit developmentofadecisionaidtoelicittreatmentpreferencesfordisplacedfemoralneckfractures |