Cargando…

Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to provide satisfactory decompression and minimize complications for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving multiple levels (3 levels or more) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of two surgical ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Dasheng, Ding, Zhenqi, Lian, Kejian, Hong, Jiayuan, Zhai, Wenliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345814
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91642
_version_ 1782222611851247616
author Lin, Dasheng
Ding, Zhenqi
Lian, Kejian
Hong, Jiayuan
Zhai, Wenliang
author_facet Lin, Dasheng
Ding, Zhenqi
Lian, Kejian
Hong, Jiayuan
Zhai, Wenliang
author_sort Lin, Dasheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to provide satisfactory decompression and minimize complications for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving multiple levels (3 levels or more) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of two surgical approaches for cervical OPLL involving multiple levels; anterior direct decompression and fixation, and posterior indirect decompression and fixation. We present a retrospective review of 56 cases followed at a single Institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared patients of multiple levels cervical OPLL that were treated at a single institution either with anterior direct decompression and fixation or with posterior indirect decompression and fixation. The clinical records of the patients with a minimum duration of follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. The associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients constitute the clinical material. 26 cases were treated by anterior corpectomy and fixation and 30 cases received posterior laminectomy and fixation. The two populations were similar. It was found that both anterior and posterior decompression and fixation can achieve satisfactory outcomes, and posterior surgery was accomplished in a shorter period of time with lesser blood loss. Although patients had comparable preoperative Japanese Orthopaedics Association (JOA) scores, those with a canal occupancy by OPLL more than 50% and managed anteriorly had better outcomes. However, for those with more severe stenosis, anterior approach was more difficult and associated with higher risks and complications. Despite its limitations in patients with high occupancy OPLLs, through the multiple level laminectomy, posterior fixation can achieve effective decompression, maintaining or restoring stability of the cervical spine, and thereby improving neural outcome and preventing the progression of OPLL. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior indirect decompression and fixation has now been adopted as the primary treatment for cervical OPLL involving multiple levels with the canal occupancy by OPLL <50% at our institution because this approach leads to significantly less implant failures. Those patients with the occupancy ≥50% managed with anterior approach surgeries had better outcomes, but approach was more difficult and associated with higher risk and complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3270613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32706132012-02-15 Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach Lin, Dasheng Ding, Zhenqi Lian, Kejian Hong, Jiayuan Zhai, Wenliang Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to provide satisfactory decompression and minimize complications for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving multiple levels (3 levels or more) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of two surgical approaches for cervical OPLL involving multiple levels; anterior direct decompression and fixation, and posterior indirect decompression and fixation. We present a retrospective review of 56 cases followed at a single Institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared patients of multiple levels cervical OPLL that were treated at a single institution either with anterior direct decompression and fixation or with posterior indirect decompression and fixation. The clinical records of the patients with a minimum duration of follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. The associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients constitute the clinical material. 26 cases were treated by anterior corpectomy and fixation and 30 cases received posterior laminectomy and fixation. The two populations were similar. It was found that both anterior and posterior decompression and fixation can achieve satisfactory outcomes, and posterior surgery was accomplished in a shorter period of time with lesser blood loss. Although patients had comparable preoperative Japanese Orthopaedics Association (JOA) scores, those with a canal occupancy by OPLL more than 50% and managed anteriorly had better outcomes. However, for those with more severe stenosis, anterior approach was more difficult and associated with higher risks and complications. Despite its limitations in patients with high occupancy OPLLs, through the multiple level laminectomy, posterior fixation can achieve effective decompression, maintaining or restoring stability of the cervical spine, and thereby improving neural outcome and preventing the progression of OPLL. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior indirect decompression and fixation has now been adopted as the primary treatment for cervical OPLL involving multiple levels with the canal occupancy by OPLL <50% at our institution because this approach leads to significantly less implant failures. Those patients with the occupancy ≥50% managed with anterior approach surgeries had better outcomes, but approach was more difficult and associated with higher risk and complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3270613/ /pubmed/22345814 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91642 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lin, Dasheng
Ding, Zhenqi
Lian, Kejian
Hong, Jiayuan
Zhai, Wenliang
Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
title Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
title_full Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
title_fullStr Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
title_full_unstemmed Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
title_short Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
title_sort cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior versus posterior approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345814
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91642
work_keys_str_mv AT lindasheng cervicalossificationoftheposteriorlongitudinalligamentanteriorversusposteriorapproach
AT dingzhenqi cervicalossificationoftheposteriorlongitudinalligamentanteriorversusposteriorapproach
AT liankejian cervicalossificationoftheposteriorlongitudinalligamentanteriorversusposteriorapproach
AT hongjiayuan cervicalossificationoftheposteriorlongitudinalligamentanteriorversusposteriorapproach
AT zhaiwenliang cervicalossificationoftheposteriorlongitudinalligamentanteriorversusposteriorapproach