Cargando…

30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit

BACKGROUND: In 2005, The Danish National Indicator Project (DNIP) reported findings on patients hospitalized with perforated ulcer. The indicator “30-days mortality” showed major discrepancy between the observed mortality of 28% and the chosen standard (10%). RATIONALE: An audit committee was appoin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakano, Anne, Bendix, Jørgen, Adamsen, Sven, Buck, Daniel, Mainz, Jan, Bartels, Paul, Nørgård, Bente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22312201
_version_ 1782222628153458688
author Nakano, Anne
Bendix, Jørgen
Adamsen, Sven
Buck, Daniel
Mainz, Jan
Bartels, Paul
Nørgård, Bente
author_facet Nakano, Anne
Bendix, Jørgen
Adamsen, Sven
Buck, Daniel
Mainz, Jan
Bartels, Paul
Nørgård, Bente
author_sort Nakano, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2005, The Danish National Indicator Project (DNIP) reported findings on patients hospitalized with perforated ulcer. The indicator “30-days mortality” showed major discrepancy between the observed mortality of 28% and the chosen standard (10%). RATIONALE: An audit committee was appointed to examine quality problems linked to the high mortality. The purpose was to (i) examine patient characteristics, (ii) evaluate the appropriateness of the standard, and (iii) audit all cases of deaths within 30 days after surgery. METHODS: Four hundred and twelve consecutive patients were included and used for the analyses of patient characteristics. The evaluation of the standard was based on a literature review, and a structured audit was performed according to the 115 deaths that occurred. RESULTS: The mean age was 69.1 years, 42.0% had one co-morbid disease and 17.7% had two co-morbid diseases. 45.9% had an American Association of Anaesthetists score of 3–4. We found no results on mortality in studies similar to ours. The audit process indicated that the postoperative observation of patients was insufficient. DISCUSSION: As a result of this study, the standard for mortality was increased to 20%, and the new indicators for postoperative monitoring were developed. The DNIP continues to evaluate if these initiatives will improve the results on mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3270894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32708942012-02-06 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit Nakano, Anne Bendix, Jørgen Adamsen, Sven Buck, Daniel Mainz, Jan Bartels, Paul Nørgård, Bente Risk Manag Healthc Policy Oiginal Research BACKGROUND: In 2005, The Danish National Indicator Project (DNIP) reported findings on patients hospitalized with perforated ulcer. The indicator “30-days mortality” showed major discrepancy between the observed mortality of 28% and the chosen standard (10%). RATIONALE: An audit committee was appointed to examine quality problems linked to the high mortality. The purpose was to (i) examine patient characteristics, (ii) evaluate the appropriateness of the standard, and (iii) audit all cases of deaths within 30 days after surgery. METHODS: Four hundred and twelve consecutive patients were included and used for the analyses of patient characteristics. The evaluation of the standard was based on a literature review, and a structured audit was performed according to the 115 deaths that occurred. RESULTS: The mean age was 69.1 years, 42.0% had one co-morbid disease and 17.7% had two co-morbid diseases. 45.9% had an American Association of Anaesthetists score of 3–4. We found no results on mortality in studies similar to ours. The audit process indicated that the postoperative observation of patients was insufficient. DISCUSSION: As a result of this study, the standard for mortality was increased to 20%, and the new indicators for postoperative monitoring were developed. The DNIP continues to evaluate if these initiatives will improve the results on mortality. Dove Medical Press 2008-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3270894/ /pubmed/22312201 Text en © 2008 Nakano et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oiginal Research
Nakano, Anne
Bendix, Jørgen
Adamsen, Sven
Buck, Daniel
Mainz, Jan
Bartels, Paul
Nørgård, Bente
30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
title 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
title_full 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
title_fullStr 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
title_full_unstemmed 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
title_short 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A national audit
title_sort 30-days mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: a national audit
topic Oiginal Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22312201
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanoanne 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit
AT bendixjørgen 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit
AT adamsensven 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit
AT buckdaniel 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit
AT mainzjan 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit
AT bartelspaul 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit
AT nørgardbente 30daysmortalityinpatientswithperforatedpepticulceranationalaudit